Cited by 48

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

WIPI-dependent autophagy during neutrophil differentiation of NB4 acute promyelocytic leukemia cells

Brigger, D, Proikas-Cezanne, T, Tschan, M P·2014·Cell Death & Disease

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/cddis.2014.261

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 Significantly decreased WIPI-1 mRNA expression in primary AML patient samples and increase in WIPI-1 expression upon ATRA treatment of NB4 APL cells was detected. (a) WIPI-1 mRNA levels of granulocytes from healthy donors and AML patient samples were measured using qPCR. Data represent log2 expression levels and were normalized to the expression levels of the two housekeeping genes HMBS and ABL. For better readability, we multiplied the results by (−1) and excluded Ct values higher than 40 (ΔCt=40−CtWIPI-1−(Mean CtHMBS and CtABL1) × (−1)). (b) mRNA levels of WIPI-1 expression was measured in control, and ATRA-treated NB4, NB4-R2 APL cell lines at day 4 using qPCR. Values were normalized to the housekeeping gene HMBS and given as n-fold mRNA expression relative to the control of day 4. (c, d) Increase in endogenous WIPI-1 puncta was detected using confocal microscopy and was further quantified using ImageJ software. (e) PI3P:WIPI-1 binding assay of cell lysates from NB4 cells treated with 1 μM ATRA for 6 days. Each membrane was loaded with equal total protein lysate. M.W.U, *P<0.05. **P<0.01, ***P<0.001. M.W.U, Mann–Whitney U-test
Figure 1 Significantly decreased WIPI-1 mRNA expression in primary AML patient samples and increase in WIPI-1 expression upon ATRA treatment of NB4 APL cells was detected. (a) WIPI-1 mRNA levels of granulocytes from healthy donors and AML patient samples were measured using qPCR. Data represent log2 expression levels and were normalized to the expression levels of the two housekeeping genes HMBS and ABL. For better readability, we multiplied the results by (−1) and excluded Ct values higher than 40 (ΔCt=40−CtWIPI-1−(Mean CtHMBS and CtABL1) × (−1)). (b) mRNA levels of WIPI-1 expression was measured in control, and ATRA-treated NB4, NB4-R2 APL cell lines at day 4 using qPCR. Values were normalized to the housekeeping gene HMBS and given as n-fold mRNA expression relative to the control of day 4. (c, d) Increase in endogenous WIPI-1 puncta was detected using confocal microscopy and was further quantified using ImageJ software. (e) PI3P:WIPI-1 binding assay of cell lysates from NB4 cells treated with 1 μM ATRA for 6 days. Each membrane was loaded with equal total protein lysate. M.W.U, *P<0.05. **P<0.01, ***P<0.001. M.W.U, Mann–Whitney U-testCC BY-NC-SA · PubMed Central
Figure 2 PU.1-dependent WIPI-1 regulation in NB4 APL cells. (a) Schematic representation of a 5.8-kb human WIPI-1 promoter fragment. Using MatInspector, 4 putative PU.1 binding sites (circles) are found in the human WIPI-1 promoter. (b) In vivo binding of PU.1 to the 4 binding sites was shown by ChIP in NB4 cells using antibodies against PU.1. Antibodies against acetyl-histone H3 and IgG served as positive and negative controls, respectively. GAPDH amplification was shown as a negative control for the different pull-downs. (c) Upper panel: WIPI-1 mRNA expression was measured in NB4 shPU.1 knockdown cells upon ATRA treatment at day 4. Lower panel: PU.1 western blot analysis of NB4 SHC002 control and PU.1 knockdown cells. Total protein expression was used as loading control. (d) NB4 cells, transduced with an inducible PU-1-ER expressing vector were treated with 4-OHT to induce PU.1 translocation to the nucleus. WIPI-1 mRNA levels were assessed by qPCR and normalized to the HMBS housekeeping gene. Results are given as n-fold regulation compared with untreated, control transduced NB4 pBabe cells. M.W.U, ***P<0.001. M.W.U, Mann–Whitney U-test
Figure 2 PU.1-dependent WIPI-1 regulation in NB4 APL cells. (a) Schematic representation of a 5.8-kb human WIPI-1 promoter fragment. Using MatInspector, 4 putative PU.1 binding sites (circles) are found in the human WIPI-1 promoter. (b) In vivo binding of PU.1 to the 4 binding sites was shown by ChIP in NB4 cells using antibodies against PU.1. Antibodies against acetyl-histone H3 and IgG served as positive and negative controls, respectively. GAPDH amplification was shown as a negative control for the different pull-downs. (c) Upper panel: WIPI-1 mRNA expression was measured in NB4 shPU.1 knockdown cells upon ATRA treatment at day 4. Lower panel: PU.1 western blot analysis of NB4 SHC002 control and PU.1 knockdown cells. Total protein expression was used as loading control. (d) NB4 cells, transduced with an inducible PU-1-ER expressing vector were treated with 4-OHT to induce PU.1 translocation to the nucleus. WIPI-1 mRNA levels were assessed by qPCR and normalized to the HMBS housekeeping gene. Results are given as n-fold regulation compared with untreated, control transduced NB4 pBabe cells. M.W.U, ***P<0.001. M.W.U, Mann–Whitney U-testCC BY-NC-SA · PubMed Central
Figure 3 Impaired neutrophil differentiation in NB4 WIPI-1, WIPI-2, PI3KC3 but not in BECN1 knockdown cells. (a) SHC002, shWIPI-1, shWIPI-2, shPI3KC3 and shBECN1 expressing NB4 cells were differentiated for 4 days and knockdown efficiency was measured by qPCR. (b) Neutrophil differentiation was assessed by measuring CD11b surface expression with FACS analysis, a representative CD11b histogram is shown. (c) Bar graphs of the median fluorescence intensity of three independent experiments are shown. (d) CEBPE mRNA expression was measured by qPCR in SHC002, shWIPI-1, shWIPI-2, shPI3KC3 and shBECN1 expressing NB4 cells upon 1 μM ATRA treatment after 4 days. (e) NBT assay was performed at day 4 in SHC, shWIPI-1, shWIPI-2, shPI3KC3 and shBECN1 NB4 APL cells and NBT-positive cells were quantified from two independent experiments done in duplicate. (f) Relative transcript abundance for WIPI-1 and WIPI-2 was calculated as described in.12 M.W.U, *P<0.05. **P<0.01, ***P<0.001. M.W.U, Mann–Whitney U-test
Figure 3 Impaired neutrophil differentiation in NB4 WIPI-1, WIPI-2, PI3KC3 but not in BECN1 knockdown cells. (a) SHC002, shWIPI-1, shWIPI-2, shPI3KC3 and shBECN1 expressing NB4 cells were differentiated for 4 days and knockdown efficiency was measured by qPCR. (b) Neutrophil differentiation was assessed by measuring CD11b surface expression with FACS analysis, a representative CD11b histogram is shown. (c) Bar graphs of the median fluorescence intensity of three independent experiments are shown. (d) CEBPE mRNA expression was measured by qPCR in SHC002, shWIPI-1, shWIPI-2, shPI3KC3 and shBECN1 expressing NB4 cells upon 1 μM ATRA treatment after 4 days. (e) NBT assay was performed at day 4 in SHC, shWIPI-1, shWIPI-2, shPI3KC3 and shBECN1 NB4 APL cells and NBT-positive cells were quantified from two independent experiments done in duplicate. (f) Relative transcript abundance for WIPI-1 and WIPI-2 was calculated as described in.12 M.W.U, *P<0.05. **P<0.01, ***P<0.001. M.W.U, Mann–Whitney U-testCC BY-NC-SA · PubMed Central
Figure 4 Attenuated differentiation of WIPI-1 and WIPI-2 knockdown APL cells is in part due to impaired autophagy. (a) Autophagic flux was measured in SHC002 and shWIPI-1 or shWIPI-2 expressing NB4 cells upon 1 μM ATRA treatment at day 4 in the presence or absence of bafilomycin A1 by measuring endogenous LC3-II protein levels on western blot and four independently performed experiments were quantified. GAPDH was used as loading control. (b) Stable EGFP-Cherry-LC3 expressing NB4 cells were transduced either with SHC002, shWIPI-1 or shWIPI-2 and cells were treated with 1 μM ATRA for 4 days. Bafilomycin A1 was added after 3 days. Representative pictures of EGFP-Cherry-LC3 puncta from three independently performed experiments are shown. (c) The rate of long-lived protein degradation was measured in control and ATRA-treated SHC002 control cells or WIPI-1, WIPI-2 knockdown cells, in the presence or absence of the lysosomal inhibitor bafilomycin A1.21 The degradation rate for long-lived proteins was calculated as the percentage of radioactivity in the TCA-soluble fraction relative to the total radioactivity in nonsoluble fractions. Further, values were subtracted from the corresponding sample treated with bafilomycin A1. (d) Long-lived protein degradation in NB4 SHC002 control and PU.1 knockdown cells. Analysis as in c. M.W.U, *P<0.05. **P<0.01. M.W.U, Mann–Whitney U-test
Figure 4 Attenuated differentiation of WIPI-1 and WIPI-2 knockdown APL cells is in part due to impaired autophagy. (a) Autophagic flux was measured in SHC002 and shWIPI-1 or shWIPI-2 expressing NB4 cells upon 1 μM ATRA treatment at day 4 in the presence or absence of bafilomycin A1 by measuring endogenous LC3-II protein levels on western blot and four independently performed experiments were quantified. GAPDH was used as loading control. (b) Stable EGFP-Cherry-LC3 expressing NB4 cells were transduced either with SHC002, shWIPI-1 or shWIPI-2 and cells were treated with 1 μM ATRA for 4 days. Bafilomycin A1 was added after 3 days. Representative pictures of EGFP-Cherry-LC3 puncta from three independently performed experiments are shown. (c) The rate of long-lived protein degradation was measured in control and ATRA-treated SHC002 control cells or WIPI-1, WIPI-2 knockdown cells, in the presence or absence of the lysosomal inhibitor bafilomycin A1.21 The degradation rate for long-lived proteins was calculated as the percentage of radioactivity in the TCA-soluble fraction relative to the total radioactivity in nonsoluble fractions. Further, values were subtracted from the corresponding sample treated with bafilomycin A1. (d) Long-lived protein degradation in NB4 SHC002 control and PU.1 knockdown cells. Analysis as in c. M.W.U, *P<0.05. **P<0.01. M.W.U, Mann–Whitney U-testCC BY-NC-SA · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Research works printed but not linked: 46

  1. Cecconi F, Levine B . The role of autophagy in mammalian development: cell makeover rather than cell death. Dev Cell 2008; 15: 344–357. · DOI
  2. Mizushima N, Levine B, Cuervo AM, Klionsky DJ . Autophagy fights disease through cellular self-digestion. Nature 2008; 451: 1069–1075. · DOI · Paper page
  3. Meijer AJ, Codogno P . Autophagy: regulation and role in disease. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci 2009; 46: 210–240. · DOI
  4. Hershko A, Ciechanover A . The ubiquitin system. Annu Rev Biochem 1998; 67: 425–479. · DOI · Paper page
  5. Codogno P, Mehrpour M, Proikas-Cezanne T . Canonical and non-canonical autophagy: variations on a common theme of self-eating? Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2012; 13: 7–12. · DOI
  6. Blommaart EF, Krause U, Schellens JP, Vreeling-Sindelárová H, Meijer AJ . The phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase inhibitors wortmannin and LY294002 inhibit autophagy in isolated rat hepatocytes. Eur J Biochem 1997; 243: 240–246. · DOI
  7. Knævelsrud H, Simonsen A . Lipids in autophagy: constituents, signaling molecules and cargo with relevance to disease. Biochim Biophys Acta 2012; 1821: 1133–1145. · DOI
  8. Simonsen A, Tooze SA . Coordination of membrane events during autophagy by multiple class III PI3-kinase complexes. J Cell Biol 2009; 186: 773–782. · DOI
  9. Petiot A, Ogier-Denis E, Blommaart EFC, Meijer AJ, Codogno P . Distinct classes of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinases are involved in signaling pathways that control macroautophagy in HT-29 cells. J Biol Chem 2000; 275: 992–998. · DOI
  10. Axe EL, Walker SA, Manifava M, Chandra P, Roderick HL, Habermann A et al. Autophagosome formation from membrane compartments enriched in phosphatidylinositol 3-phosphate and dynamically connected to the endoplasmic reticulum. J Cell Biol 2008; 182: 685–701. · DOI · Paper page
  11. Proikas-Cezanne T, Waddell S, Gaugel A, Frickey T, Lupas A, Nordheim A et al. WIPI-1alpha (WIPI49), a member of the novel 7-bladed WIPI protein family, is aberrantly expressed in human cancer and is linked to starvation-induced autophagy. Oncogene 2004; 23: 9314–9325. · DOI · Paper page
  12. Polson HE, de Lartigue J, Rigden DJ, Reedijk M, Urbé S, Clague MJ et al. Mammalian Atg18 (WIPI2) localizes to omegasome-anchored phagophores and positively regulates LC3 lipidation. Autophagy 2010; 6: 506–522. · DOI · Paper page
  13. Mauthe M, Jacob A, Freiberger S, Hentschel K, Stierhof YD, Codogno P et al. Resveratrol-mediated autophagy requires WIPI-1-regulated LC3 lipidation in the absence of induced phagophore formation. Autophagy 2011; 7: 1448–1461. · DOI · Paper page
  14. Lu Q, Yang P, Huang X, Hu W, Guo B, Wu F et al. The WD40 Repeat PtdIns(3)P-binding protein EPG-6 regulates progression of omegasomes to autophagosomes. Dev Cell 2011; 21: 343–357. · DOI · Paper page
  15. Cáceres-Cortés JR . Blastic leukaemias (AML): a biologist’s view. Cell Biochem Biophys 2012; 66: 13–22. · DOI
  16. Isakson P, Bjoras M, Boe SO, Simonsen A . Autophagy contributes to therapy-induced degradation of the PML/RARA oncoprotein. Blood 2010; 116: 2324–2331. · DOI
  17. Bøe SO, Simonsen A . Autophagic degradation of an oncoprotein. Autophagy 2010; 6: 964–965. · DOI
  18. Trocoli A, Mathieu J, Priault M, Reiffers J, Souquère S, Pierron G et al. ATRA-induced upregulation of Beclin 1 prolongs the life span of differentiated acute promyelocytic leukemia cells. Autophagy 2011; 7: 1108–1114. · DOI · Paper page
  19. Zhang S-P, Niu YN, Yuan N, Zhang AH, Chao D, Xu QP et al. Role of autophagy in acute myeloid leukemia therapy. Chin J Cancer 2012; 32: 130–135. · DOI
  20. Brigger D, Torbett BE, Chen J, Fey MF, Tschan MP . Inhibition of GATE-16 attenuates ATRA-induced neutrophil differentiation of APL cells and interferes with autophagosome formation. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2013; 438: 283–288. · DOI
  21. Mizushima N, Yoshimori T, Levine B . Methods in mammalian autophagy research. Cell 2010; 140: 313–326. · DOI · Paper page
  22. Kabeya Y, Mizushima N, Ueno T, Yamamoto A, Kirisako T, Noda T et al. LC3, a mammalian homologue of yeast Apg8p, is localized in autophagosome membranes after processing. EMBO J 2000; 19: 5720–5728. · DOI · Paper page
  23. Bakula D, Takacs Z, Proikas-Cezanne T . WIPI β-propellers in autophagy-related diseases and longevity. Biochem Soc Trans 2013; 41: 962–967. · DOI
  24. Kusama Y, Sato K, Kimura N, Mitamura J, Ohdaira H, Yoshida K . Comprehensive analysis of expression pattern and promoter regulation of human autophagy-related genes. Apoptosis 2009; 14: 1165–1175. · DOI
  25. He Z, Liu H, Agostini M, Yousefi S, Perren A, Tschan MP et al. p73 regulates autophagy and hepatocellular lipid metabolism through a transcriptional activation of the ATG5 gene. Cell Death Differ 2013; 20: 1415–1424. · DOI
  26. Kang Y-A, Sanalkumar R, O’Geen H, Linnemann AK, Chang CJ, Bouhassira EE et al. Autophagy driven by a master regulator of hematopoiesis. Mol Cell Biol 2012; 32: 226–239. · DOI · Paper page
  27. Wang K, Wang P, Shi J, Zhu X, He M, Jia X et al. PML/RARα targets promoter regions containing PU.1 consensus and RARE half sites in acute promyelocytic leukemia. Cancer Cell 2010; 17: 186–197. · DOI
  28. Itakura E, Kishi-Itakura C, Koyama-Honda I, Mizushima N . Structures containing Atg9A and the ULK1 complex independently target depolarized mitochondria at initial stages of Parkin-mediated mitophagy. J Cell Sci 2012; 125: 1488–1499. · DOI · Paper page
  29. Itakura E, Mizushima N . Characterization of autophagosome formation site by a hierarchical analysis of mammalian Atg proteins. Autophagy 2010; 6: 764–776. · DOI · Paper page
  30. Wirawan E, Lippens S, Vanden Berghe T, Romagnoli A, Fimia GM, Piacentini M et al. Beclin1: a role in membrane dynamics and beyond. Autophagy 2012; 8: 6–17. · DOI
  31. Wang Z, Cao L, Kang R, Yang M, Liu L, Zhao Y et al. Autophagy regulates myeloid cell differentiation by p62/SQSTM1-mediated degradation of PML-RARα oncoprotein. Autophagy 2011; 7: 401–411. · DOI
  32. Devereaux K, Dall’Armi C, Alcazar-Roman A, Ogasawara Y, Zhou X, Wang F et al. Regulation of mammalian autophagy by Class II and III PI 3-kinases through PI3P Synthesis. PLoS One 2013; 8: 1–17. · DOI · Paper page
  33. Nishioka C, Ikezoe T, Yang J, Gery S, Koeffler HP, Yokoyama A et al. Inhibition of mammalian target of rapamycin signaling potentiates the effects of all- transretinoic acid to induce growth arrest and differentiation of human acute myelogenous leukemia cells. Int J Cancer 2009; 125: 1710–1720. · DOI
  34. Breems DA, Boogaerts MA, Dekker AW, Van Putten WL, Sonneveld P, Huijgens PC et al. Autologous bone marrow transplantation as consolidation therapy in the treatment of adult patients under 60 years with acute myeloid leukaemia in first complete remission: a prospective randomized Dutch-Belgian Haemato-Oncology Co-operative Group (HOVON) and Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK) trial. Br J Haematol 2005; 128: 59–65. · DOI
  35. Federzoni EA, Valk PJ, Torbett BE, Haferlach T, Löwenberg B, Fey MF et al. PU.1 is linking the glycolytic enzyme HK3 in neutrophil differentiation and survival of APL cells. Blood 2012; 119: 4963–4970. · DOI
  36. Lowenberg B, Boogaerts MA, Daenen SM, Verhoef GE, Hagenbeek A, Vellenga E et al. Value of different modalities of granulocyte- macrophage colony-stimulating factor applied during or after induction therapy of acute myeloid leukemia. J Clin Oncol 1997; 15: 3496–3506. · DOI
  37. Lowenberg B, van Putten W, Theobald M, Gmür J, Verdonck L, Sonneveld P et al. Effect of priming with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor on the outcome of chemotherapy for acute myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med 2003; 349: 743–752. · DOI
  38. Ossenkoppele GJ . The value of fludarabine in addition to ARA-C and G-CSF in the treatment of patients with high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes and AML in elderly patients. Blood 2004; 103: 2908–2913. · DOI
  39. Rockova V, Abbas S, Wouters BJ, Erpelinck CA, Beverloo HB, Delwel R et al. Risk stratification of intermediate-risk acute myeloid leukemia: integrative analysis of a multitude of gene mutation and gene expression markers. Blood 2011; 118: 1069–1076. · DOI
  40. Duprez E, Benoit G, Flexor M, Lillehaug JR, Lanotte M . A mutated PML/RARA found in the retinoid maturation resistant NB4 subclone, NB4-R2, blocks RARA and wild-type PML/RARA transcriptional activities. Leukemia 2000; 14: 255–261. · DOI
  41. Ochs HD, Igo RP . The NBT slide test: a simple method for detecting chronic granulomatous disease and female carriers. J Pediatr 1973; 83: 77–82. · DOI
  42. Tschan MP, Shan D, Laedrach J, Eyholzer M, Leibundgut EO, Baerlocher GM et al. NDRG1/2 expression is inhibited in primary acute myeloid leukemia. Leuk Res 2010; 34: 393–398. · DOI
  43. Britschgi C, Rizzi M, Grob TJ, Tschan MP, Hügli B, Reddy VA et al. Identification of the p53 family-responsive element in the promoter region of the tumor suppressor gene hypermethylated in cancer 1. Oncogene 2005; 25: 2030–2039. · DOI
  44. Ogier-Denis E, Houri J-J, Bauvy C, Codogno P . Guanine Nucleotide Exchange on Heterotrimeric Gi3 Protein Controls Autophagic Sequestration in HT-29 Cells*. J Biol Chem 1996; 271: 28593–28600. · DOI
  45. Kaeser MD, Iggo RD . Chromatin immunoprecipitation analysis fails to support the latency model for regulation of p53 DNA binding activity in vivo. Cell 2002; 99: 95–100.
  46. Tschan MP . Alternative splicing of the human cyclin d-binding myb-like protein (hdmp1) yields a truncated protein isoform that alters macrophage differentiation patterns. J Biol Chem 2003; 278: 42750–42760. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Brigger, D., Proikas-Cezanne, T., & Tschan, M. P.
Venue
Cell Death & Disease
Published
2014-07-03
Volume
5
Issue
7
Pages
e1315-e1315
ISSN
2041-4889
Cited by
48
References
5
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review