CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 252Gestational Diabetes Research and ManagementPregnancy and Medication ImpactDiabetes Treatment and Management

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 51 of the 52 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Are We Optimizing Gestational Diabetes Treatment With Glyburide? The Pharmacologic Basis for Better Clinical Practice

Open access
Hebert, MF, Ma, X, Naraharisetti, SB, Krudys, KM, Umans, JG, Hankins, GDV, Caritis, SN, Miodovnik, M, Mattison, DR, Unadkat, JD, Kelly, EJ, Blough, D, Cobelli, C, Ahmed, MS, Snodgrass, WR, Carr, DB, Easterling, TR, Vicini, P·2009·Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
DOI 10.1038/clpt.2009.5PMC PMC2684566
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Glyburide's pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics have not been studied in women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). The objective of this study was to assess steady-state PK of glyburide, as well as insulin sensitivity, beta-cell responsivity, and overall disposition indices after a mixed-meal tolerance test (MMTT) in women with GDM (n = 40), nonpregnant women with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) (n = 26), and healthy pregnant women (n = 40, MMTT only). At equivalent doses, glyburide plasma concentrations were approximately 50% lower in pregnant women than in nonpregnant subjects. The average umbilical cord/maternal plasma glyburide concentration ratio at the time of delivery was 0.7 +/- 0.4. Insulin sensitivity was approximately fivefold lower in women with GDM as compared with healthy pregnant women. Despite comparable beta-cell responsivity indices, the average beta-cell function corrected for insulin resistance was more than 3.5-fold lower in women with glyburide-treated GDM than in healthy pregnant women. Women with GDM in whom glyburide treatment has failed may benefit from alternative medication or dosage escalation; however, fetal safety should be kept in mind.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/clpt.2009.5

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 52 references

1 of the 52 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. 10.2337/diacare.10.6.71 · DOI
  2. Zhang Y.F, 2005, Yao Xue Xue Bao, 40, 796
  3. Buchanan T.A, 1995, Diabetes Rev, 3, 584
  4. 10.1210/jc.86.3.989 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Hebert, M., Ma, X., Naraharisetti, S., Krudys, K., Umans, J., Hankins, G., Caritis, S., Miodovnik, M., Mattison, D., Unadkat, J., Kelly, E., Blough, D., Cobelli, C., Ahmed, M., Snodgrass, W., Carr, D., Easterling, T., & Vicini, P.
Affiliations
  • University of Washington (US)
  • The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston (US)
  • MedStar Washington Hospital Center (US)
  • University of Padua (IT)
  • Pfizer (United States) (US)
ORCID
Venue
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-03-18
Volume
85
Issue
6
Pages
607-614
ISSN
  • 0009-9236 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-6535
DOI
10.1038/clpt.2009.5
PMC
PMC2684566
OpenAlex
W1964571629
Cited by
252
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 16
FWCI
19.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Pfizer
  • University of Pittsburgh
  • National Institutes of Health (UL1TR000423, UL1TR000005)
  • National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (P41EB001975)
  • National Center for Research Resources (M01RR023942, M01-RR 00037, UL1RR025014, M01RR020359, M01RR000037)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (U10HD047891, U10HD047892, U10HD047890, U10HD047905)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Pregnancy and Medication Impact
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
Keywords
gestational diabetes mellitus, glibenclamide, pharmacokinetics, insulin sensitivity, beta-cell function, insulin resistance, mixed meal tolerance test, type 2 diabetes, dose escalation, fetal safety
MeSH terms
Adult, Aryl Hydrocarbon Hydroxylases, Blood Glucose, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Female, Fetal Blood, Glyburide, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Insulin Resistance, Metabolic Clearance Rate, Monte Carlo Method, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Trimester, Third, Diabetes, Gestational, Area Under Curve, Insulin-Secreting Cells, Cytochrome P-450 CYP2C9

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review