Cited by 199Pregnancy and Medication ImpactPregnancy and preeclampsia studiesPharmaceutical studies and practices

The Human Placental Perfusion Model: A Systematic Review and Development of a Model to Predict In Vivo Transfer of Therapeutic Drugs

Hutson, J R, Garcia-Bournissen, F, Davis, A, Koren, G·2011·Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics

Abstract

Dual perfusion of a single placental lobule is the only experimental model to study human placental transfer of substances in organized placental tissue. To date, there has not been any attempt at a systematic evaluation of this model. The aim of this study was to systematically evaluate the perfusion model in predicting placental drug transfer and to develop a pharmacokinetic model to account for nonplacental pharmacokinetic parameters in the perfusion results. In general, the fetal-to-maternal drug concentration ratios matched well between placental perfusion experiments and in vivo samples taken at the time of delivery of the infant. After modeling for differences in maternal and fetal/neonatal protein binding and blood pH, the perfusion results were able to accurately predict in vivo transfer at steady state (R² = 0.85, P < 0.0001). Placental perfusion experiments can be used to predict placental drug transfer when adjusting for extra parameters and can be useful for assessing drug therapy risks and benefits in pregnancy.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/clpt.2011.66

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Dual-perfusion of the delivered placenta has validated transfer for approximately 50 drugs.

    “Comparison of the data with maternal-fetal in vivo measurements has validated transfer for approximately 50 drugs (266).”

    From Placental Origins of Chronic Disease (2016) · cites this paper as [266]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hutson, J. R., Garcia-Bournissen, F., Davis, A., & Koren, G.
Affiliations
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • Hospital for Sick Children (CA)
Corresponding author
Koren, G
Venue
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-05-11
Volume
90
Issue
1
Pages
67-76
ISSN
  • 0009-9236 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-6535
OpenAlex
W2069218640
Cited by
199
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 12
FWCI
1.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Pregnancy and Medication Impact
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pharmaceutical studies and practices
Keywords
maternal-fetal drug transfer, pharmacokinetic modeling, protein binding, blood pH, drug safety in pregnancy, in vivo prediction
MeSH terms
Adult, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Pharmaceutical Preparations, Female, Fetal Blood, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Maternal-Fetal Exchange, Models, Biological, Perfusion, Placenta, Pregnancy, Regional Blood Flow, Models, Statistical, In Vitro Techniques

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review