The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Toll‐like receptors: the swiss army knife of immunity and vaccine development
Open accessAbstract
Innate immune cells have a critical role in defense against infection and disease. Central to this is the broad specificity with which they can detect pathogen‐associated patterns and danger‐associated patterns via the pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) they express. Several families of PRRs have been identified including: Toll‐like receptors (TLRs), C‐type lectin‐like receptors, retinoic acid‐inducible gene‐like receptors and nucleotide‐binding oligomerization domain–like receptors. TLRs are one of the most largely studied families of PRRs. The binding of ligands to TLRs on antigen presenting cells (APCs), mainly dendritic cells, leads to APC maturation, induction of inflammatory cytokines and the priming of naive T cells to drive acquired immunity. Therefore, activation of TLRs promotes both innate inflammatory responses and the induction of adaptive immunity. Consequently, in the last two decades mounting evidence has inextricably linked TLR activation with the pathogenesis of immune diseases and cancer. It has become advantageous to harness these aspects of TLR signaling therapeutically to accelerate and enhance the induction of vaccine‐specific responses and also target TLRs with the use of biologics and small molecule inhibitors for the treatment of disease. In these respects, TLRs may be considered a ‘Swiss Army’ knife of the immune system, ready to respond in a multitude of infectious and disease states. Here we describe the latest advances in TLR‐targeted therapeutics and the use of TLR ligands as vaccine adjuvants.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Differentiation of Effector CD4 T Cell Populations
Zhu, J., Yamane, H., & Paul, W. E. (2010) · Annual Review of Immunology · doi:10.1146/annurev-immunol-030409-101212 · Cited by 3,452
TLR13 Recognizes Bacterial 23 S rRNA Devoid of Erythromycin Resistance–Forming Modification
Oldenburg, M., Krüger, A., Ferstl, R., Kaufmann, A., Nees, G., Sigmund, A., Bathke, B., Lauterbach, H., Suter, M., Dreher, S., et al. (2012) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1220363 · Cited by 405
Cited by
Next generation of immune checkpoint therapy in cancer: new developments and challenges
Marin-Acevedo, J. A., Dholaria, B., Soyano, A. E., Knutson, K. L., Chumsri, S., & Lou, Y. (2018) · Journal of Hematology & Oncology · doi:10.1186/s13045-018-0582-8 · Cited by 804
Progress in biopharmaceutical development
Kesik‐Brodacka, M. (2018) · Biotechnology and Applied Biochemistry · doi:10.1002/bab.1617 · Cited by 353
Immunotherapies targeting stimulatory pathways and beyond
Marin-Acevedo, J. A., Kimbrough, E. O., Manochakian, R., Zhao, Y., & Lou, Y. (2021) · Journal of Hematology & Oncology · doi:10.1186/s13045-021-01085-3 · Cited by 52
Metadata
- Authors
- Dowling, J. K., & Mansell, A.
- Venue
- Clinical & Translational Immunology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2016-05
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- e85-e85
- ISSN
- 2050-0068 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2394725514
- Cited by
- 273
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 21.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Toll‐like receptors: the swiss army knife of immunity and vaccine development. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/cti.2016.22
- The paper
- Dowling, J. K., & Mansell, A. (2016). Toll‐like receptors: the swiss army knife of immunity and vaccine development. Clinical & Translational Immunology. https://doi.org/10.1038/cti.2016.22
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.