Cited by 50Pharmaceutical industry and healthcareAcademic Publishing and Open AccessPharmaceutical Economics and Policy

Be open about drug failures to speed up research

Alteri, Enrica, Guizzaro, Lorenzo·2018·Nature

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/d41586-018-07352-7

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Alteri, E., & Guizzaro, L.
Affiliations
European Medicines Agency (NL)
Corresponding author
Alteri, Enrica
Venue
Nature
Published
2018-11-13
Volume
563
Issue
7731
Pages
317-319
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2900608357
Cited by
50
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 1
FWCI
6.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Academic Publishing and Open Access
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy
Keywords
drug failure, transparency, access to evidence, drug development, research acceleration, clinical trial data sharing
MeSH terms
Drug Development, Alzheimer Disease, Clinical Trials as Topic, Drug Industry, Humans, Time Factors, Truth Disclosure, Treatment Failure, Information Dissemination

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review