Cited by 20Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesTreatment of Major DepressionAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 82 of the 83 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Persistence of suicidal ideation within acute phase treatment of major depressive disorder: analysis of clinical predictors

Open access
Olgiati, Paolo, Serretti, Alessandro·2022·International Clinical Psychopharmacology

Abstract

Suicidal ideation (SI) is common in major depressive disorder (MDD), and it is a risk factor for suicidal behaviour. Antidepressants are effective in reducing SI, but in some subjects, SI may persist for weeks. This study aimed to disentangle the contribution of baseline clinical characteristics in SI nonremission at week 6. Research involved 198 outpatients with MDD and SI collected within the Combining Medications to Enhance Depression Outcomes trial and treated with different antidepressant combinations. Although SI decreased from baseline to week 6 (P < 0.0001), 78 patients (39%) failed to achieve SI remission. Insomnia [OR, 0.72; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.52–0.99], reduced need for sleep (OR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.58–0.99), self-confidence (OR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.32–0.82), cheerfulness (OR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.33–0.98), and comorbid panic disorder (OR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.87–0.99) at baseline were associated with lack of SI remission after controlling for baseline depression and SI scores. The combination of baseline SI and insomnia was moderately effective in predicting the lack of SI remission, with a specificity of 80% (95% CI, 72–87%) and an NPV of 68% (95% CI, 63–72%). In individuals with MDD and SI, the presence of insomnia and bipolar features should prompt a search for more effective treatment solutions in order to favour SI remission and prevent suicidal behaviour.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/yic.0000000000000416

Cites

82 of 82 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 83 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Olgiati, P., & Serretti, A.
Affiliations
University of Bologna (IT)
Corresponding author
Serretti, Alessandro
Venue
International Clinical Psychopharmacology
Published
2022-07-07
Volume
37
Issue
5
Pages
193-200
ISSN
0268-1315 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4282570432
Cited by
20
References
83
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3
FWCI
4.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Clinical Psychopharmacology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • IRIS eCampus Telematic University (Università degli Studi eCampus) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Mental Health
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology (medical) › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
suicidal ideation, major depressive disorder, antidepressant treatment, insomnia, self-confidence, cheerfulness, suicide risk
MeSH terms
Antidepressive Agents, Major Depressive Disorder, Humans, Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders, Risk Factors, Suicidal Ideation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review