Cited by 87COVID-19, Geopolitics, Technology, MigrationArtificial Intelligence ApplicationsResearch, Science, and Academia

The race to the top among the world’s leaders in artificial intelligence

Savage, Neil·2020·Nature

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/d41586-020-03409-8

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In recent years, the battle for geopolitical hegemony has meant that other major powers, notably China, have also invested significantly in AI research.

    “In more recent years, the battle for geopolitical hegemony has meant that other major powers, notably China, have also invested significantly in AI research (Barton et al. 2017;Allen 2019;Savage 2020;Roberts et al. 2021).”

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Savage, N.
Corresponding author
Savage, Neil
Venue
Nature
Published
2020-12-09
Volume
588
Issue
7837
Pages
S102-S104
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W3112262800
Cited by
87
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 8
FWCI
42.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › COVID-19, Geopolitics, Technology, Migration
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence Applications
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Research, Science, and Academia
Keywords
artificial intelligence, global competition, United States, China, Europe

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review