Cited by 130Ethics and Social Impacts of AIArtificial Intelligence ApplicationsInnovation, Sustainability, Human-Machine Systems

Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence: The Superlative Approach to Achieve Sustainable Development Goals in the Fourth Industrial Revolution

Open access
Mhlanga, David·2022·Sustainability

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is currently being developed by large corporations, and governments all over the world are yearning for it. AI isn’t a futuristic concept; it is already here, and it is being implemented in a range of industries. Finance, national security, health care, criminal justice, transportation, and smart cities are all examples of this. There are countless examples of AI having a substantial impact on the world and complementing human abilities. However, due to the immense societal ramifications of these technologies, AI is on the verge of disrupting a host of industries, so the technique by which AI systems are created must be better understood. The goal of the study was to look at what it meant to be human-centred, how to create human-centred AI, and what considerations should be made for human-centred AI to achieve sustainability and the SDGs. Using a systematic literature review technique, the study discovered that a human-centred AI strategy strives to create and implement AI systems in ways that benefit mankind and serve their interests. The study also found that a human-in-the-loop concept should be used to develop procedures for creating human-centred AI, as well as other initiatives, such as the promotion of AI accountability, encouraging businesses to use autonomy wisely, to motivate businesses to be aware of human and algorithmic biases, to ensure that businesses prioritize customers, and form multicultural teams to tackle AI research. The study concluded with policy recommendations for human-centred AI to help accomplish the SDGs, including expanding government AI investments, addressing data and algorithm biases, and resolving data access issues, among other things.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/su14137804

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Williams, O. Towards Human-Centred Explainable AI: A Systematic Literature Review. Master's Thesis, University of Birming- ham, Birmingham, UK, 2021.
  2. Kok, J.N.; Boers, E.J.; Kosters, W.A.; Van der Putten, P.; Poel, M. Artificial intelligence: Definition, trends, techniques, and cases. Artif. Intell. 2009, 1, 270-299.
  3. Nature Index. Top 100 Academic Institutions in Artificial Intelligence; Springer Nature: London, UK, 2020.
  4. Pittway, L. Systematic literature reviews. In The SAGE Dictionary of Qualitative Management Research;
  5. Shneiderman, B. Human-centred AI. Issues Sci. Technol. 2021, 37, 56-61.
  6. Cranor, L.F. A Framework for Reasoning about the Human in the Loop; USENIX: Berkley, CA, USA, 2008.
  7. Price, F.L. The Influence of Cultural Intelligence (CQ) on Multicultural Team Performance. Ph.D. Dissertation, Saint Leo University, Saint Leo, FL, USA, 2021.

Authors
Mhlanga, D.
Affiliations
University of Johannesburg (ZA)
Corresponding author
Mhlanga, David
Venue
Sustainability
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2022-06-27
Volume
14
Issue
13
Pages
7804
ISSN
2071-1050 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4283644014
Cited by
130
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 42 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 2
FWCI
30.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Sustainability (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence Applications
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Innovation, Sustainability, Human-Machine Systems
Keywords
Sustainable Development Goals, Fourth Industrial Revolution, human-in-the-loop, AI accountability, algorithmic bias, human bias, corporate autonomy, multicultural teams, AI policy, data access, societal impact of AI

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review