The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Lactobacillus GG as an immune adjuvant for live-attenuated influenza vaccine in healthy adults: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial
Open accessAbstract
Background/Objectives:Live-attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV) protects against influenza by mucosal activation of the immune system. Studies in animals and adults have demonstrated that probiotics improve the immune response to mucosally delivered vaccines. We hypothesized that Lactobacillus GG (LGG) would function as an immune adjuvant to increase rates of seroconversion after LAIV administration.Subjects/Methods:We conducted a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled pilot study to determine whether LGG improved rates of seroconversion after administration of LAIV. We studied 42 healthy adults during the 2007–2008 influenza season. All subjects received LAIV and then were randomized to LGG or placebo, twice daily for 28 days. Hemagglutinin inhibition titers were assessed at baseline, at day 28 and at day 56 to determine the rates of seroconversion. Subjects were assessed for adverse events throughout the study period.Results:A total of 39 subjects completed the per-protocol analysis. Both LGG and LAIV were well tolerated. Protection rates against the vaccine H1N1 and B strains were suboptimal in subjects receiving LGG and placebo. For the H3N2 strain, 84% receiving LGG vs 55% receiving placebo had a protective titer 28 days after vaccination (odds of having a protective titer was 1.84 95% confidence interval 1.04–3.22, P=0.048).Conclusion:Lactobacillus GG is potential as an important adjuvant to improve influenza vaccine immunogenicity. Future studies of probiotics as immune adjuvants might need to specifically consider examining vaccine-naïve or sero-negative subjects, target mucosal immune responses or focus on groups known to have poor response to influenza vaccines.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Holland, D., Booy, R., Looze, F. D., Eizenberg, P., McDonald, J., Karrasch, J., McKeirnan, M., Salem, H., Mills, G., Reid, J., et al. (2008) · The Journal of Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1086/590434 · Cited by 254
Soh, S. E., Ong, D. Q. R., Gerez, I., Zhang, X., Chollate, P., Shek, L. P.-C., Lee, B. W., & Aw, M. (2010) · Vaccine · doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2010.01.020 · Cited by 78
Cited by
Factors That Influence the Immune Response to Vaccination
Zimmermann, P., & Curtis, N. (2019) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.00084-18 · Cited by 939
Yan, F., & Polk, D. B. (2011) · Current Opinion in Gastroenterology · doi:10.1097/mog.0b013e32834baa4d · Cited by 447
Lefevre, M., Racedo, S. M., Ripert, G., Housez, B., Cazaubiel, M., Maudet, C., Jüsten, P., Marteau, P., & Urdaci, M. C. (2015) · Immunity & Ageing · doi:10.1186/s12979-015-0051-y · Cited by 147
The influence of probiotics on vaccine responses—A systematic review
Zimmermann, P., & Curtis, N. (2018) · Vaccine · doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.08.069 · Cited by 142
Lei, W.-T., Shih, P.-C., Liu, S.-J., Lin, C.-Y., & Yeh, T.-L. (2017) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu9111175 · Cited by 134
“Davidson 2011 [32] USA (4 weeks) 42 healthy adults (38%:62%) 33.”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluential
Metadata
- Authors
- Davidson, L. E., Fiorino, A.-M., Snydman, D. R., & Hibberd, P. L.
- Venue
- European Journal of Clinical Nutrition
- Published
- 2011-02-02
- Volume
- 65
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 501-507
- ISSN
- 0954-3007 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-5640
- OpenAlex
- W2023196450
- Cited by
- 169
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 10.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Lactobacillus GG as an immune adjuvant for live-attenuated influenza vaccine in healthy adults: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/ejcn.2010.289
- The paper
- Davidson, L. E., Fiorino, A.-M., Snydman, D. R., & Hibberd, P. L. (2011). Lactobacillus GG as an immune adjuvant for live-attenuated influenza vaccine in healthy adults: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition. https://doi.org/10.1038/ejcn.2010.289
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.