Cited by 184Nutritional Studies and DietMeat and Animal Product QualityCardiovascular Health and Risk Factors

Red and processed meat consumption and risk of stroke: a meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies

Chen, G-C, Lv, D-B, Pang, Z, Liu, Q-F·2013·European Journal of Clinical Nutrition

Abstract

Background/objectives Epidemiological evidence is suggestive, but inconclusive, for an association between consumption of red and processed meat and risk of stroke. We aimed to assess this association by conducting a meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies.Subjects/methods We performed a literature search on PubMed database through June 2012 to identify prospective cohort studies of red and processed meat intake in relation to risk of stroke. Reference lists of the retrieved articles were also reviewed. Both fixed-effects and random-effects model were assumed to compute the summary risk estimates.Results Five large independent prospective cohort studies were identified. These studies contained a total of 2 39 251 subjects and 9593 stroke events. Comparing the highest category of consumption with lowest category, the pooled relative risks (RRs) of total stroke were 1.15 (95% confidence interval (CI), 1.05-1.25) for total meat (red and processed meat combined) (n=4), 1.09 (95% CI, 1.01-1.18) for red meat (n=5) and 1.14 (95% CI, 1.05-1.25) for processed meat (n=5); the corresponding RRs of ischemic stroke (highest vs lowest quintile) were 1.15 (95% CI, 1.04-1.28), 1.13(95% CI, 1.01-1.25) and 1.19 (95% CI, 1.08-1.31). Consumption of red and/or processed meat was not associated with hemorrhagic stroke. In the dose-response analysis, the risk of stroke increased significantly by 10% and 13% for each 100 g per day increment in total and red meat consumption, respectively, and by 11% for each 50 g per day increment in processed meat consumption.Conclusion Findings from this meta-analysis indicate that consumption of red and/or processed meat increase risk of stroke, in particular, ischemic stroke.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/ejcn.2012.180

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In several large studies, poultry is not significantly associated with CVD events; in other cohorts, poultry is associated with modestly lower risk of CVD, with smaller observed benefits than seen for fish, nuts, or legumes.

    “In several large studies, poultry is not significantly associated with CVD events;174, 186-189 and in other cohorts, with modestly lower risk of CVD, with smaller observed benefits than seen for fish, nuts, or legumes.52, 53”
  • While a minority of individual studies suggest similar cardiovascular risk for unprocessed red meat vs. processed meats, many other individual studies and meta-analyses support much stronger effects of processed meats, including low-fat deli meats, on CVD.

    “Consistent with this, while a minority of individual studies suggest similar cardiovascular risk for unprocessed red meat vs. processed meats,170, 171 many other individual studies and meta-analyses support much stronger effects of processed meats, including low-fat deli meats, on CVD (Figure 6).172-174”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chen, G.-C., Lv, D.-B., Pang, Z., & Liu, Q.-F.
Affiliations
  • Soochow University (CN)
  • Suzhou Municipal Hospital (CN)
Corresponding author
Liu, Q-F
Venue
European Journal of Clinical Nutrition
Published
2012-11-21
Volume
67
Issue
1
Pages
91-95
ISSN
  • 0954-3007 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-5640
OpenAlex
W2045962738
Cited by
184
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 8
FWCI
1.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Clinical Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Meat and Animal Product Quality
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
Keywords
red meat consumption, processed meat consumption, stroke risk, ischemic stroke, hemorrhagic stroke, dose-response relationship, dietary risk factors
MeSH terms
Animals, Cattle, Brain Ischemia, Humans, Meat, Meat Products, Prospective Studies, Risk, Cohort Studies, Stroke, Sus scrofa, Sheep, Domestic, Food, Preserved

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review