Cited by 87Drug-Induced Ocular ToxicityOcular Oncology and TreatmentsChemotherapy-related skin toxicity

MEK inhibitors: a new class of chemotherapeutic agents with ocular toxicity

Open access
Duncan, K E, Chang, L Y, Patronas, M·2015·Eye

Abstract

A new class of chemotherapeutic agents, MEK inhibitors, has recently been developed and is proving to be an effective treatment for a number of cancers. A pattern of ocular adverse events has followed these drugs through clinical trials and their association with retinopathy is only just beginning to be recognized. We present two cases of MEK inhibitor-associated retinopathy followed by a review of the current literature on ocular toxicity associated with MEK inhibitors. Patients undergoing treatment with MEK inhibitors appear to have high rates of multifocal serous retinal detachments as well as retinal vein occlusions. We present the first report of cystoid macular edema associated with MEK inhibitor use. The mechanism of these adverse events is still unclear though they seem to be related to oxidative stress and blood retinal barrier breakdown. Management of the ocular toxicity can range from observation to topical treatments or intravitreal injections. Fortunately most ocular adverse events appear to be self-limited and do not require discontinuing the MEK inhibitor. Discontinuation or decreased dosing of MEK inhibitors may be reserved for cases of severe sight-threatening ocular toxicity.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/eye.2015.82

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Duncan, K. E., Chang, L. Y., & Patronas, M.
Affiliations
University of Maryland, Baltimore (US)
Corresponding author
Duncan, K E
Venue
Eye
Published
2015-06-05
Volume
29
Issue
8
Pages
1003-1012
ISSN
  • 0078-5334 (ISSN-L)
  • 0950-222X
  • 1476-5454
OpenAlex
W584714177
Cited by
87
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 2
FWCI
9.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Eye (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Drug-Induced Ocular Toxicity
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Ocular Oncology and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Chemotherapy-related skin toxicity
Keywords
MEK inhibitors, ocular toxicity, retinopathy, serous retinal detachment, retinal vein occlusion, cystoid macular edema, blood-retinal barrier breakdown, oxidative stress, adverse drug reactions, intravitreal injection, topical treatment, cancer chemotherapy
MeSH terms
Antineoplastic Agents, Female, Humans, Macular Edema, Male, Middle Aged, Retinal Diseases, Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinases, Protein Kinase Inhibitors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review