The DOI matches its Crossref record; 47 of the 47 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Prevalence of white-coat and masked hypertension in national and international registries
Open accessAbstract
In the past two decades, techniques for the measurement of blood pressure outside the medical setting have unmasked highly prevalent situations. A significant proportion of patients with office blood pressure levels above the thresholds for diagnosing hypertension or above the limits where those being treated are considered to be adequately controlled actually show normal ambulatory blood pressure levels. These patients have white-coat hypertension if untreated or false resistance to antihypertensive therapy because of the white-coat effect if treated. However, some individuals with normal office blood pressure measurements show elevated ambulatory blood pressure levels, and thus have masked hypertension if untreated or masked uncontrolled hypertension if treated. When looking for white-coat hypertension in patients with elevated office blood pressure levels or when looking for masked hypertension in office-controlled patients, up to one in three patients in each scenario would have white-coat or masked hypertension. Although related clinical factors, such as age, gender and global cardiovascular risk, are associated with both conditions, their abilities to predict such a misclassification are very low. Thus, assessing individual blood pressure levels by means of an ambulatory technique, particularly ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, is now considered a priority in diagnosing hypertension and in evaluating hypertension control.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Although office BP was the most commonly used method by the included RCTs and in clinical practice, it is consistently least predictive of cardiovascular outcomes among BP measurement methods due to both white-coat and masked effects 51,52”
From Effect and Acceptability of Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction Program on Patients With Elevated Blood Pressure or Hypertension: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials (2020) · cites this paper as [51]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
2013 ESH/ESC Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension
Authors Task Force Members, Mancia, G., Fagard, R., Narkiewicz, K., Redon, J., Zanchetti, A., Böhm, M., Christiaens, T., Cífková, R., Backer, G. D., et al. (2013) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/eht151 · Cited by 13,739
Lim, S. S., Vos, T., Flaxman, A. D., Danaei, G., Shibuya, K., Adair-Rohani, H., AlMazroa, M. A., Amann, M., Anderson, H. R., Andrews, K. G., et al. (2012) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(12)61766-8 · Cited by 11,805
Global burden of hypertension: analysis of worldwide data
Kearney, P. M., Whelton, M., Reynolds, K., Muntner, P., Whelton, P. K., & He, J. (2005) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(05)17741-1 · Cited by 8,698
Mancia, G., Fagard, R., Narkiewicz, K., Redón, J., Zanchetti, A., Böhm, M., Christiaens, T., Cifkova, R., De Backer, G., Dominiczak, A., et al. (2013) · Journal of Hypertension · doi:10.1097/01.hjh.0000431740.32696.cc · Cited by 5,655
Global burden of blood-pressure-related disease, 2001
Lawes, C. M. M., Hoorn, S. V., & Rodgers, A. (2008) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(08)60655-8 · Cited by 2,314
Resistant Hypertension: Diagnosis, Evaluation, and Treatment
Calhoun, D. A., Jones, D. W., Textor, S. C., Goff, D. C., Murphy, T. P., Toto, R. D., White, A. J., Cushman, W. C., White, W. B., Sica, D. A., et al. (2008) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.108.189141 · Cited by 2,240
Ambulatory blood pressure. An independent predictor of prognosis in essential hypertension.
Verdecchia, P., Porcellati, C., Schillaci, G., Borgioni, C., Ciucci, A., Battistelli, M., Guerrieri, M., Gatteschi, C., Zampi, I., Santucci, A., et al. (1994) · Hypertension · doi:10.1161/01.hyp.24.6.793 · Cited by 1,671
Staessen, J. A. (1999) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.282.6.539 · Cited by 1,592
European Society of hypertension position paper on ambulatory blood pressure monitoring
O’Brien, E., Parati, G., Stergiou, G., Asmar, R., Beilin, L., Bilo, G., Clement, D., de la Sierra, A., de Leeuw, P., Dolan, E., et al. (2013) · Journal of Hypertension · doi:10.1097/hjh.0b013e328363e964 · Cited by 1,419
Dolan, E., Stanton, A., Thijs, L., Hinedi, K., Atkins, N., McClory, S., Hond, E. D., McCormack, P., Staessen, J. A., & O’Brien, E. (2005) · Hypertension · doi:10.1161/01.hyp.0000170138.56903.7a · Cited by 1,227
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Whelton, P. K., Carey, R. M., Aronow, W. S., Casey, D. E., Collins, K. J., Dennison Himmelfarb, C., DePalma, S. M., Gidding, S., Jamerson, K. A., Jones, D. W., et al. (2018) · Hypertension · doi:10.1161/hyp.0000000000000065 · Cited by 7,391
Whelton, P. K., Carey, R. M., Aronow, W. S., Casey, D. E., Collins, K. J., Dennison Himmelfarb, C., DePalma, S. M., Gidding, S., Jamerson, K. A., Jones, D. W., et al. (2018) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2017.11.006 · Cited by 6,616
Mancia, G., Kreutz, R., Brunström, M., Burnier, M., Grassi, G., Januszewicz, A., Muiesan, M. L., Tsioufis, K., Agabiti-Rosei, E., Algharably, E. A. E., et al. (2023) · Journal of Hypertension · doi:10.1097/hjh.0000000000003480 · Cited by 3,473
Whelton, P. K., Carey, R. M., Aronow, W. S., Casey, D. E., Collins, K. J., Dennison Himmelfarb, C., DePalma, S. M., Gidding, S., Jamerson, K. A., Jones, D. W., et al. (2018) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/cir.0000000000000596 · Cited by 1,127
Ding, X., & Zhang, Y. (2019) · Biomedical Engineering Letters · doi:10.1007/s13534-019-00096-x · Cited by 142
Metadata
- Authors
- Gorostidi, M., Vinyoles, E., Banegas, J. R., & de la Sierra, A.
- Affiliations
- Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias (ES)
- Universitat de Barcelona (ES)
- Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (ES)
- Venue
- Hypertension Research
- Published
- 2014-10-16
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-7
- ISSN
- 0916-9636 (ISSN-L)
- 1348-4214
- OpenAlex
- W2077649372
- Cited by
- 141
- References
- 47
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 7
- FWCI
- 1.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Hypertension Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Sodium Intake and Health
- Keywords
- white coat hypertension, masked hypertension, ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, office blood pressure, hypertension misclassification, hypertension control, cardiovascular risk factors
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Prevalence, Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory, White Coat Hypertension, Masked Hypertension
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
