The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Privatization of cooperative benefits stabilizes mutualistic cross-feeding interactions in spatially structured environments
Open accessAbstract
Metabolic cross-feeding interactions are ubiquitous in natural microbial communities. However, it remains generally unclear whether the production and exchange of metabolites incurs fitness costs to the producing cells and if so, which ecological mechanisms can facilitate a cooperative exchange of metabolites among unrelated individuals. We hypothesized that positive assortment within structured environments can maintain mutualistic cross-feeding. To test this, we engineered Acinetobacter baylyi and Escherichia coli to reciprocally exchange essential amino acids. Interspecific coculture experiments confirmed that non-cooperating types were selectively favoured in spatially unstructured (liquid culture), yet disfavoured in spatially structured environments (agar plates). Both an individual-based model and experiments with engineered genotypes indicated that a segregation of cross-feeders and non-cooperating auxotrophs stabilized cooperative cross-feeding in spatially structured environments. Chemical imaging confirmed that auxotrophs were spatially excluded from cooperative benefits. Together, these results demonstrate that cooperative cross-feeding between different bacterial species is favoured in structured environments such as bacterial biofilms, suggesting this type of interactions might be common in natural bacterial communities.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bacterial Biofilms: A Common Cause of Persistent Infections
Costerton, J. W., Stewart, P. S., & Greenberg, E. P. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.284.5418.1318 · Cited by 12,167
The Evolution of Reciprocal Altruism
Trivers, R. L. (1971) · The Quarterly Review of Biology · doi:10.1086/406755 · Cited by 11,010
Construction of Escherichia coli K‐12 in‐frame, single‐gene knockout mutants: the Keio collection
Baba, T., Ara, T., Hasegawa, M., Takai, Y., Okumura, Y., Baba, M., Datsenko, K. A., Tomita, M., Wanner, B. L., & Mori, H. (2006) · Molecular Systems Biology · doi:10.1038/msb4100050 · Cited by 7,858
Cited by
The evolution of host-symbiont dependence
Fisher, R. M., Henry, L. M., Cornwallis, C. K., Kiers, E. T., & West, S. A. (2017) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms15973 · Cited by 316
Defining Division of Labor in Microbial Communities
Giri, S., Waschina, S., Kaleta, C., & Kost, C. (2019) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2019.06.023 · Cited by 89
Bottom-Up Approaches to Synthetic Cooperation in Microbial Communities
Rodríguez Amor, D., & Dal Bello, M. (2019) · Life · doi:10.3390/life9010022 · Cited by 71
Metadata
- Authors
- Pande, S., Kaftan, F., Lang, S., Svatoš, A., Germerodt, S., & Kost, C.
- Venue
- The ISME Journal
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2015-12-01
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1413-1423
- ISSN
- 1751-7362 (ISSN-L)
- 1751-7370
- OpenAlex
- W1921951426
- Cited by
- 187
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 42.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Privatization of cooperative benefits stabilizes mutualistic cross-feeding interactions in spatially structured environments. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/ismej.2015.212
- The paper
- Pande, S., Kaftan, F., Lang, S., Svatoš, A., Germerodt, S., & Kost, C. (2016). Privatization of cooperative benefits stabilizes mutualistic cross-feeding interactions in spatially structured environments. The ISME Journal. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2015.212
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.