The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Dietary input of microbes and host genetic variation shape among-population differences in stickleback gut microbiota
Open accessAbstract
To explain differences in gut microbial communities we must determine how processes regulating microbial community assembly (colonization, persistence) differ among hosts and affect microbiota composition. We surveyed the gut microbiota of threespine stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus) from 10 geographically clustered populations and sequenced environmental samples to track potential colonizing microbes and quantify the effects of host environment and genotype. Gut microbiota composition and diversity varied among populations. These among-population differences were associated with multiple covarying ecological variables: habitat type (lake, stream, estuary), lake geomorphology and food- (but not water-) associated microbiota. Fish genotype also covaried with gut microbiota composition; more genetically divergent populations exhibited more divergent gut microbiota. Our results suggest that population level differences in stickleback gut microbiota may depend more on internal sorting processes (host genotype) than on colonization processes (transient environmental effects).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data
Caporaso, J. G., Kuczynski, J., Stombaugh, J., Bittinger, K., Bushman, F. D., Costello, E. K., Fierer, N., Peña, A. G., Goodrich, J. K., Gordon, J. I., et al. (2010) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.f.303 · Cited by 34,887
Self-citationGreengenes, a Chimera-Checked 16S rRNA Gene Database and Workbench Compatible with ARB
DeSantis, T. Z., Hugenholtz, P., Larsen, N., Rojas, M., Brodie, E. L., Keller, K., Huber, T., Dalevi, D., Hu, P., & Andersen, G. L. (2006) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.03006-05 · Cited by 10,891
UniFrac: a New Phylogenetic Method for Comparing Microbial Communities
Lozupone, C., & Knight, R. (2005) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.71.12.8228-8235.2005 · Cited by 8,227
Self-citationHost-gut microbiota metabolic interactions
Nicholson, J. K., Holmes, E., Kinross, J., Burcelin, R., Gibson, G., Jia, W., & Pettersson, S. (2012) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1223813 · Cited by 4,760
Interactions Between the Microbiota and the Immune System
Hooper, L. V., Littman, D. R., & Macpherson, A. J. (2012) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1223490 · Cited by 4,173
Treg induction by a rationally selected mixture of Clostridia strains from the human microbiota
Atarashi, K., Tanoue, T., Oshima, K., Suda, W., Nagano, Y., Nishikawa, H., Fukuda, S., Saito, T., Narushima, S., Hase, K., et al. (2013) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature12331 · Cited by 2,872
Diet Drives Convergence in Gut Microbiome Functions Across Mammalian Phylogeny and Within Humans
Muegge, B. D., Kuczynski, J., Knights, D., Clemente, J. C., González, A., Fontana, L., Henrissat, B., Knight, R., & Gordon, J. I. (2011) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1198719 · Cited by 1,988
Self-citationHigh-Fat Diet Determines the Composition of the Murine Gut Microbiome Independently of Obesity
Hildebrandt, M. A., Hoffmann, C., Sherrill–Mix, S. A., Keilbaugh, S. A., Hamady, M., Chen, Y., Knight, R., Ahima, R. S., Bushman, F., & Wu, G. D. (2009) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2009.08.042 · Cited by 1,576 · cited 1×
“In particular, host food composition affects the persistence of extant microbes through nutritional inputs needed to sustain microbial reproduction (Hildebrandt et al., 2009; Wu et al., 2011; Parks et al., 2013).”
BackgroundSelf-citationDiet, gut microbiota and immune responses
Maslowski, K. M., & Mackay, C. R. (2011) · Nature Immunology · doi:10.1038/ni0111-5 · Cited by 1,261
Gut Microbiota, Intestinal Permeability, Obesity‐Induced Inflammation, and Liver Injury
Frazier, T. H., DiBaise, J. K., & McClain, C. J. (2011) · Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition · doi:10.1177/0148607111413772 · Cited by 306
Cited by
Yukgehnaish, K., Kumar, P., Sivachandran, P., Marimuthu, K., Arshad, A., Paray, B. A., & Arockiaraj, J. (2020) · Reviews in Aquaculture · doi:10.1111/raq.12416 · Cited by 470
Faecal microbiota transplantation protects against radiation‐induced toxicity
Cui, M., Xiao, H., Li, Y., Zhou, L., Zhao, S., Luo, D., Zheng, Q., Dong, J., Zhao, Y., Zhang, X., et al. (2017) · EMBO Molecular Medicine · doi:10.15252/emmm.201606932 · Cited by 328
Making a microbiome: the many determinants of host-associated microbial community composition
Adair, K. L., & Douglas, A. E. (2017) · Current Opinion in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.mib.2016.11.002 · Cited by 284
Metadata
- Authors
- Smith, C. C. R., Snowberg, L. K., Gregory Caporaso, J., Knight, R., & Bolnick, D. I.
- Venue
- The ISME Journal
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2015-04-24
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 2515-2526
- ISSN
- 1751-7362 (ISSN-L)
- 1751-7370
- OpenAlex
- W2012139809
- Cited by
- 359
- References
- 10
- FWCI
- 8.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dietary input of microbes and host genetic variation shape among-population differences in stickleback gut microbiota. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/ismej.2015.64
- The paper
- Smith, C. C. R., Snowberg, L. K., Gregory Caporaso, J., Knight, R., & Bolnick, D. I. (2015). Dietary input of microbes and host genetic variation shape among-population differences in stickleback gut microbiota. The ISME Journal. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2015.64
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
