The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Cerebral Blood Flow and Cerebral Metabolic Rate of Oxygen Requirements for Cerebral Function and Viability in Humans
Abstract
This study was undertaken to determine the minimum CBF and CMRO 2 required by the human brain to maintain normal function and viability for more than a few hours. Positron emission tomography (PET) was used to perform regional measurements in 50 subjects with varying degrees of cerebral ischemia but no evidence of infarction. There were 24 normal subjects, 24 subjects with arteriographic evidence of vascular disease of the carotid system, and two subjects with reversible ischemic neurological deficits due to cerebral vasospasm. Minimum values found in the 48 subjects with normal neurological function were 19 ml/100 g-min for regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) and 1.3 ml/100 g-min for regional cerebral metabolic rate of oxygen (rCMRO 2). Minimum values for all 50 subjects with viable cerebral tissue were 15 ml/100 g-min for rCBF and 1.3 ml/100 g-min for rCMRO 2. Comparison of these measurements with values from 20 areas of established cerebral infarction in 10 subjects demonstrated that 80% (16/20) of infarcted regions had rCMRO 2 values below the lower normal limit of 1.3 ml/100g-min. Measurements of rCBF, regional cerebral blood volume, and oxygen extraction fraction were less useful for distinguishing viable from infarcted tissue. These data indicate that quantitative regional measurements of rCMRO 2 with PET accurately distinguish viable from nonviable cerebral tissue and may be useful in the prospective identification of patients with reversible ischemia.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM): Decoding MRI data for a tissue magnetic biomarker
Wang, Y., & Liu, T. (2015) · Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · doi:10.1002/mrm.25358 · Cited by 878
White matter injury in the preterm infant: pathology and mechanisms
Back, S. A. (2017) · Acta Neuropathologica · doi:10.1007/s00401-017-1718-6 · Cited by 473
Methodology of brain perfusion imaging
Barbier, E. L., Lamalle, L., & Décorps, M. (2001) · Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging · doi:10.1002/jmri.1073 · Cited by 404
Perfusion Thresholds in Human Cerebral Ischemia: Historical Perspective and Therapeutic Implications
Baron, J.-C. (2001) · Cerebrovascular Diseases · doi:10.1159/000049119 · Cited by 352
Yarkoni, T., Barch, D. M., Gray, J. R., Conturo, T. E., & Braver, T. S. (2009) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0004257 · Cited by 312
Cerebral blood flow and metabolism in fulminant liver failure
Wendon, J. A., Harrison, P. M., Keays, R., & Williams, R. (1994) · Hepatology · doi:10.1002/hep.1840190614 · Cited by 220
Regional oxygen extraction predicts border zone vulnerability to stroke in sickle cell disease
Fields, M. E., Guilliams, K. P., Ragan, D. K., Binkley, M. M., Eldeniz, C., Chen, Y., Hulbert, M. L., McKinstry, R. C., Shimony, J. S., Vo, K. D., et al. (2018) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.0000000000005194 · Cited by 113
Metadata
- Authors
- Powers, W. J., Grubb, R. L., Darriet, D., & Raichle, M. E.
- Venue
- Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1985-12
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 600-608
- ISSN
- 0271-678X (ISSN-L)
- 1559-7016
- OpenAlex
- W2083893789
- Cited by
- 425
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.