Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 705

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

What is the Correct Value for the Brain-Blood Partition Coefficient for Water?

Herscovitch, Peter, Raichle, Marcus E.·1985·Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism

Abstract

A knowledge of the brain-blood partition coefficient (γ) for water is usually required for the measurement of CBF with [15 O]water. The currently accepted value for whole-brain Λ, 0.95–0.96 ml/g, calculated from brain and blood water content data, is incorrect because in the calculation, the blood water content was not adjusted for the density of blood. The correct value is 0.90 ml/g. Variations in brain or blood water content affect Λ. Thus, Λ changes during development of the brain and varies regionally in it, even among different gray matter structures, owing to variation in brain water content. In addition, Λ would be expected to vary with the hematocrit, owing to changes in blood water content. The impact of using an incorrect value for Λ will depend on the sensitivity of the CBF measurement technique used to errors in Λ.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/jcbfm.1985.9

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 705

Metadata

Authors
Herscovitch, P., & Raichle, M. E.
Venue
Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism
Published
1985-03
Volume
5
Issue
1
Pages
65-69
ISSN
  • 0271-678X (ISSN-L)
  • 1559-7016
OpenAlex
W1976099054
Cited by
705
References
0
FWCI
7.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: What is the Correct Value for the Brain-Blood Partition Coefficient for Water? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/jcbfm.1985.9
The paper
Herscovitch, P., & Raichle, M. E. (1985). What is the Correct Value for the Brain-Blood Partition Coefficient for Water? Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism. https://doi.org/10.1038/jcbfm.1985.9

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.