The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Continuous Measurement of Cerebral Cortical Blood Flow by Laser—Doppler Flowmetry in a Rat Stroke Model
Open accessAbstract
Laser-Doppler flowmetry (LDF), a new method allowing instantaneous, continuous, and noninvasive measurements of microcirculatory blood flow in a small tissue sample, was evaluated for its accuracy in monitoring regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) in the cortical microcirculation after focal cerebral ischemia. Wistar and spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR, n = 19) were subjected to permanent occlusion of the middle cerebral and common carotid arteries. Absolute rCBF in a tissue sample of the ischemic hemisphere was measured autoradiographically with [14 C]iodoantipyrine as a tracer and compared to rCBF measured by LDF. Additionally, the percent change in rCBF between baseline and ischemic values was compared for both methods. Absolute rCBF values recorded with LDF correlated poorly ( r = 0.54) with [14 C]iodoantipyrine measurements. In contrast, LDF readings expressed as a percentage of ischemic vs. preocclusion readings (relative LDF readings) correlated very well ( r = 0.91) with the percent change in [14 C]iodoantipyrine measurements. We conclude that LDF does not provide accurate measurements of absolute rCBF values but this method allows accurate measurements of changes in rCBF due to induction of focal cerebral ischemia.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
THE MEMBRANOUS COVERINGS OF NEURAL TISSUES: AN ELECTORN MICROSCOPY STUDY
WAGGENER, J. D., & BEGGS, J. (1967) · Journal of Neuropathology and Experimental Neurology · doi:10.1097/00005072-196707000-00005 · Cited by 154 · cited 1×
“-Lm thick membrane with very few blood vessels and lymphatics (Pease and Schultz, 1958; Waggener and Beggs, 1967; Morse and Low, 1972).”
Background
Cited by
Relationship of spikes, synaptic activity, and local changes of cerebral blood flow
Lauritzen, M. (2001) · Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism · doi:10.1097/00004647-200112000-00001 · Cited by 253
Niwa, K., Carlson, G. A., & Iadecola, C. (2000) · Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism · doi:10.1097/00004647-200012000-00005 · Cited by 191
Monitoring of autoregulation using laser Doppler flowmetry in patients with head injury
Lam, J. M. K., Hsiang, J. N. K., & Poon, W. S. (1997) · Journal of Neurosurgery · doi:10.3171/jns.1997.86.3.0438 · Cited by 150
Astrocytes Function in Matching Blood Flow to Metabolic Activity
Harder, D. R., Zhang, C., & Gebremedhin, D. (2002) · Physiology · doi:10.1152/physiologyonline.2002.17.1.27 · Cited by 126
Thomas, C. G., & Menon, R. S. (1998) · Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · doi:10.1002/mrm.1910400206 · Cited by 77
Metadata
- Authors
- Dirnagl, U., Kaplan, B., Jacewicz, M., & Pulsinelli, W.
- Venue
- Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1989-10
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 589-596
- ISSN
- 0271-678X (ISSN-L)
- 1559-7016
- OpenAlex
- W2048879756
- Cited by
- 475
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.