Cited by 37Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis ResearchAdvanced MRI Techniques and ApplicationsMultiple Sclerosis Research Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

T 2 -Weighted MRI Detects Presymptomatic Pathology in the SOD1 Mouse Model of ALS

Open access

Abstract

Neuroinflammation has been identified as a potential therapeutic target in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), but relevant biomarkers are needed. The superoxide dismutase (SOD1) G93A transgenic mouse model of ALS offers a unique opportunity to study and potentially manipulate presymptomatic pathology. While T 2 -weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been shown to be sensitive to pathologic changes at symptom onset, no earlier biomarkers were previously identified and the underlying histopathologic correlates remain uncertain. To address these issues, we used a multimodal MRI approach targeting structural ( T 2 , T 2 , apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), magnetization transfer ratio (MTR)), vascular (gadolinium diethylene triamine pentaacetic acid), and endothelial (vascular cell adhesion molecule-microparticles of iron oxide) changes, together with histopathologic analysis from presymptomatic to symptomatic stages of disease. Presymptomatic changes in brainstem nuclei were evident on T 2 -weighted images from as early as 60 days ( P<0.05). Histologic indices of vacuolation, astro- and microglial activation all correlated with T 2 -weighted changes. Significant reductions in ADC ( P<0.01) and MTR ( P<0.05) were found at 120 days in the same brainstem nuclei. No changes in T 1 relaxation, vascular permeability, or endothelial activation were found at any stage of disease. These findings suggest that T 2 -weighted MRI offers the strongest biomarker potential in this model, and that MRI has unique potential for noninvasive and longitudinal assessment of presymptomatically applied therapeutic and neuroprotective agents.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/jcbfm.2014.19

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • One study failed to detect any T1-enhancement after gadolinium injection in SOD1 G93A mice, suggesting no change in BBB and BSCB integrity.

    “One study, however, failed to detect any T1-enhancement after gadolinium injection in SOD1 G93A mice, suggesting no change in BBB and BSCB integrity (166), in contrast to several independent previous studies discussed above showing disrupted BSCB and BBB in SOD1 G93A mice (20, 50, 51, 194, 196, 415, 431, 432, 687, 688).”

    From Blood-Brain Barrier: From Physiology to Disease and Back (2019) · cites this paper as [166]

    The Results section (page unavailable) reports no increase in brain vascular permeability on gadolinium-enhanced T1 MRI in SOD1G93A mice. The Figure 5 caption also says no change was seen in the spinal cord, but the paper does not clearly report a spinal-cord T1-enhancement result. Thus the BBB finding is supported, while the claim that the gadolinium result establishes unchanged BSCB integrity goes beyond the stated evidence. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 37

  1. 10.1126/science.8209258 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2008.01.001 · DOI
  3. 10.3109/17482960903545334 · DOI
  4. 10.1097/00001756-200305230-00029 · DOI
  5. 10.3109/17482968.2011.623300 · DOI
  6. 10.1016/j.expneurol.2006.04.007 · DOI
  7. 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2007.05831.x · DOI
  8. 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2004.03648.x · DOI
  9. 10.1097/00001756-200410050-00026 · DOI
  10. 10.1371/journal.pone.0001205 · DOI
  11. 10.1016/j.brainres.2007.04.044 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1002/jnr.22594 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1002/ar.20995 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Bataveljic D, 2009, Gen Physiol Biophys, 28, 212
  15. 10.1038/nm1631 · DOI
  16. 10.1073/pnas.1117412109 · DOI
  17. Serres S, 2009, NMR Biomed, 22, 1014, 10.1002/nbm.1404 · DOI
  18. 10.1016/j.nbd.2007.04.001 · DOI
  19. Paxinos G, 2004, The Mouse Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates.
  20. 10.1056/NEJM199412223312516 · DOI
  21. 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9861(20000103)416:1<112::AID-CNE9>3.0.CO;2-K · DOI
  22. 10.3109/00207459108985979 · DOI
  23. 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2010.02951.x · DOI
  24. 10.1212/WNL.50.1.72 · DOI
  25. 10.1097/00005072-198911000-00008 · DOI
  26. Brant-Zawadzki M, 1984, AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 5, 125
  27. 10.1002/nbm.1567 · DOI
  28. Kato Y, 1997, AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 18, 1541
  29. da Rocha AJ, 2004, AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 25, 1509
  30. 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181fb84d1 · DOI
  31. 10.1007/s00330-003-1843-6 · DOI
  32. 10.1212/WNL.45.3.478 · DOI
  33. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2614-05.2005 · DOI · Paper page
  34. 10.1096/fj.11-183772 · DOI
  35. 10.1083/jcb.113.5.1203 · DOI
  36. 10.1159/000121494 · DOI
  37. 10.1002/mus.23782 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Evans, M. C., Serres, S., Khrapitchev, A. A., Stolp, H. B., Anthony, D. C., Talbot, K., Turner, M. R., & Sibson, N. R.
Affiliations
University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
Turner, Martin R
Venue
Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism
Published
2014-02-05
Volume
34
Issue
5
Pages
785-793
ISSN
  • 0271-678X (ISSN-L)
  • 1559-7016
OpenAlex
W2030984455
Cited by
37
References
3
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3
FWCI
2.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • RVC Research Online (Royal Veterinary College) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Cancer Research UK (C5255, A12678, 16945, C5255/A12678)
  • Motor Neurone Disease Association (G0701923, TURNER/JAN13/944-795)
  • Medical Research Council (C5255/A12678, G0701923)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
Keywords
amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, T2-weighted MRI, neuroinflammation, brainstem nuclei, apparent diffusion coefficient, magnetization transfer ratio, Gd-DTPA, iron oxide microparticles, astrocyte activation, microglial activation, vacuolization, MRI biomarkers, neuroprotection
MeSH terms
Superoxide Dismutase-1, Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, Animals, Astrocytes, Blood-Brain Barrier, Brain Stem, Disease Models, Animal, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Mice, Transgenic, Motor Activity, Mutation, Permeability, Spinal Cord, Superoxide Dismutase, Weight Loss, Microglia, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review