Cited by 321Hair Growth and DisordersPeroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptorsmelanin and skin pigmentation

Hair Follicle Stem Cell-Specific PPARγ Deletion Causes Scarring Alopecia

Open access
Karnik, Pratima, Tekeste, Zenar, McCormick, Thomas S., Gilliam, Anita C., Price, Vera H., Cooper, Kevin D., Mirmirani, Paradi·2009·Journal of Investigative Dermatology

Abstract

Primary cicatricial or scarring alopecias (CA) are a group of inflammatory hair disorders of unknown pathogenesis characterized by the permanent destruction of the hair follicle. The current treatment options are ineffective in controlling disease progression largely because the molecular basis for CA is not understood. Microarray analysis of the lymphocytic CA, Lichen planopilaris (LPP), compared to normal scalp biopsies identified decreased expression of genes required for lipid metabolism and peroxisome biogenesis. Immunohistochemical analysis showed progressive loss of peroxisomes, proinflammatory lipid accumulation, and infiltration of inflammatory cells followed by destruction of the pilosebaceous unit. The expression of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) gamma, a transcription factor that regulates these processes, is significantly decreased in LPP. Specific agonists of PPARgamma are effective in inducing peroxisomal and lipid metabolic gene expression in human keratinocytes. Finally, targeted deletion of PPARgamma in follicular stem cells in mice causes a skin and hair phenotype that emulates scarring alopecia. These studies suggest that PPARgamma is crucial for healthy pilosebaceous units and it is the loss of this function that triggers the pathogenesis of LPP. We propose that PPARgamma-targeted therapy may represent a new strategy in the treatment of these disorders.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/jid.2008.369

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • PGC1α interacts with PPARγ, and PPARγ dysregulation in hair follicle stem cells produces results similar to scarring alopecia.

    “PGC1α also interacts with PPARγ, and dysregulation of PPARγ has been shown in hair follicle stem cells (HFSCs) to produce similar results to scarring alopecia (i.e., hair loss disorder) (Karnik et al., 2009).”

    From Comprehensive Multi-omics Analysis Reveals Mitochondrial Stress as a Central Biological Hub for Spaceflight Impact (2020) · cites this paper as Karnik et al., 2009

    The Introduction and Discussion (page numbers unavailable) report that deleting PPARγ in mouse hair follicle stem cells causes scarring alopecia resembling human disease. The cited paper’s passages do not establish the separate claim that PGC1α interacts with PPARγ. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Karnik, P., Tekeste, Z., McCormick, T. S., Gilliam, A. C., Price, V. H., Cooper, K. D., & Mirmirani, P.
Affiliations
  • University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center (US)
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
Corresponding author
Karnik, Pratima
Venue
Journal of Investigative Dermatology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-05
Volume
129
Issue
5
Pages
1243-1257
ISSN
0022-202X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2080345081
Cited by
321
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 41 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 16
FWCI
15.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Investigative Dermatology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • American Skin Association
  • Vanderbilt University
  • Case Western Reserve University (P30 CA43703)
  • National Institutes of Health (AR39750, CA43703)
  • School of Medicine, Vanderbilt University
  • National Cancer Institute (P-30 CA43703, P30CA043703)
  • National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (P30AR039750, P30 AR39750, R01AR056245)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Hair Growth and Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptors
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › melanin and skin pigmentation
Keywords
scarring alopecia, lichen planopilaris, PPARγ, hair follicle stem cells, peroxisome biogenesis, lipid metabolism, pilosebaceous unit, PPARγ agonists, keratinocytes, targeted therapy
MeSH terms
Alopecia, Animals, Cicatrix, Disease Models, Animal, Humans, Lichen Planus, Stem Cells, Case-Control Studies, Gene Deletion, Mice, Knockout, Hair Follicle, Peroxisomes, Microarray Analysis, PPAR gamma, Lipid Metabolism, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review