Cited by 186Cancer Immunotherapy and BiomarkersGenetic factors in colorectal cancerColorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies

Patterns and prognostic relevance of PD-1 and PD-L1 expression in colorectal carcinoma

Open access
Lee, Lik Hang, Cavalcanti, Marcela S, Segal, Neil H, Hechtman, Jaclyn F, Weiser, Martin R, Smith, J Joshua, Garcia-Aguilar, Julio, Sadot, Eran +7 more·2016·Modern Pathology

Abstract

Immune checkpoint blockade targeting the programmed death-1 (PD-1) pathway has shown efficacy in several types of cancers including mismatch-repair-deficient colorectal carcinoma. In some tumor types, programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression detected by immunohistochemistry has shown utility as a predictive marker for response to anti-PD-1 therapies. This utility, however, remains to be determined in colorectal carcinoma. In addition, although tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes have been associated with better prognosis in colorectal carcinoma, the prognostic value of PD-1 expression in these lymphocytes and its interaction with PD-L1 expression still await investigation. To address these questions, we performed a pilot study to evaluate the patterns of PD-L1 and PD-1 immunohistochemical expression on colorectal carcinoma cells and their tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, respectively. Using tissue microarray, we found that 5% (19/394) of colorectal carcinomas exhibited high tumor PD-L1 expression, and 19% (76/392) had elevated numbers of PD-1-positive tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes. PD-L1 levels correlated with PD-1 levels (P<0.001), and mismatch-repair-deficient tumors had significantly higher rates of high PD-L1 and PD-1 expression when compared with mismatch-repair-proficient tumors (18% vs 2% and 50% vs 13%, respectively; P<0.001 for both). Staining intensity was also stronger for both markers in mismatch-repair-deficient tumors. Furthermore, we observed that among patients with mismatch-repair-deficient colorectal carcinoma, PD-1/PD-L1 expression stratified recurrence-free survival in an inter-dependent manner: an association between high PD-1-positive tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and improved recurrence-free survival (P=0.041) was maintained only when the tumors had low-level PD-L1 expression (P=0.006); patients whose tumors had both high PD-1-positive tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and high PD-L1 expression had a significantly worse recurrence-free survival (P<0.001). Thus, our results not only provide a foundation for further assessment of PD-L1 immunohistochemistry as a predictive marker for anti-PD-1 therapy in colorectal carcinoma, they also shed light on the prognostic impact of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in different subsets of mismatch-repair-deficient colorectal carcinomas.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/modpathol.2016.139

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lee, L. H., Cavalcanti, M. S., Segal, N. H., Hechtman, J. F., Weiser, M. R., Smith, J. J., Garcia-Aguilar, J., Sadot, E., Ntiamoah, P., Markowitz, A. J., Shike, M., Stadler, Z. K., Vakiani, E., Klimstra, D. S., & Shia, J.
Affiliations
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US)
Corresponding author
Shia, Jinru
Venue
Modern Pathology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-11
Volume
29
Issue
11
Pages
1433-1442
ISSN
0893-3952 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2496265832
Cited by
186
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 2
FWCI
12.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Modern Pathology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (CA008748, NIH/NCI Cancer Center Support Grant P30 CA008748)
  • National Cancer Institute (Grant P30-CA008748, CA008748, NIH/NCI Cancer Center Support Grant P30 CA008748., Support Grant P30 CA008748, R01CA182551, P30CA008748)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Genetic factors in colorectal cancer
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
Keywords
PD-1, PD-L1, colorectal cancer, mismatch repair deficiency, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, immune checkpoint blockade, anti-PD-1 therapy, predictive biomarkers, prognostic factors, recurrence-free survival, tumor immune microenvironment
MeSH terms
Adenocarcinoma, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pilot Projects, Prognosis, Biomarkers, Tumor, Colorectal Neoplasms, Proportional Hazards Models, Kaplan-Meier Estimate, Young Adult, B7-H1 Antigen, Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review