Cited by 288Colorectal Cancer Treatments and StudiesGenetic factors in colorectal cancerColorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments

Multicenter retrospective analysis of metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) with high-level microsatellite instability (MSI-H)

Open access
Goldstein, J., Tran, B., Ensor, J., Gibbs, P., Wong, H.L., Wong, S.F., Vilar, E., Tie, J. +4 more·2014·Annals of Oncology

Abstract

Background The microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) phenotype, present in 15% of early colorectal cancer (CRC), confers good prognosis. MSI-H metastatic CRC is rare and its impact on outcomes is unknown. We describe survival outcomes and the impact of chemotherapy, metastatectomy, and BRAF V600E mutation status in the largest reported cohort of MSI-H metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC).Patients and methods A retrospective review of 55 MSI-H metastatic CRC patients from two institutions, Royal Melbourne Hospital (Australia) and The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (United States), was conducted. Statistical analyses utilized Kaplan-Meier method, Log-rank test, and Cox proportional hazards models.Results Median age was 67 years (20-90), 58% had poor differentiation, and 45% had stage IV disease at presentation. Median overall survival (OS) from metastatic disease was 15.4 months. Thirteen patients underwent R0/R1 metastatectomies, with median OS from metastatectomy 33.8 months. Thirty-one patients received first-line systemic chemotherapy for metastatic disease with median OS from the start of chemotherapy 11.5 months. No statistically significant difference in progression-free survival or OS was seen between fluoropyrimidine, oxaliplatin, or irinotecan based chemotherapy. BRAF V600E mutation was present in 14 of 47 patients (30%). BRAF V600E patients demonstrated significantly worse median OS; 10.1 versus 17.3 months, P = 0.03. In multivariate analyses, BRAF V600E mutants had worse OS (HR 4.04; P = 0.005), while patients undergoing metastatectomy (HR 0.11; P = <0.001) and patients who initially presented as stage IV disease had improved OS (HR 0.27; P = 0.003).Conclusions Patients with MSI-H metastatic CRC do not appear to have improved outcomes. BRAF V600E mutation is a poor prognostic factor in MSI-H metastatic CRC.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/annonc/mdu100

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Colorectal cancer exhibiting a dMMR/MSI-H profile tends to be located in the right colon and is accompanied by unfavorable characteristics such as distant lymph node metastases, peritoneal cavity spread, mucus secretion, and poor differentiation.

    “CRC exhibiting a dMMR/MSI-H profile tends to be located in the right colon, while a constellation of unfavorable characteristics such as distant lymph node metastases, peritoneal cavity spread, mucus secretion, and poor differentiation accompanies it [41,42].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 22

  1. Crane CH, Iacobuzio-Donahue CA. Keys to personalized care in pancreatic oncology. J Clin Oncol 2012; 30: 4049-4050.
  2. Mahadevan D, Von Hoff DD. Tumor-stroma interactions in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Mol Cancer Ther 2007; 6: 1186-1197.
  3. Guweidhi A, Kleeff J, Adwan H et al. Osteonectin influences growth and invasion of pancreatic cancer cells. Ann Surg 2005; 242: 224-234.
  4. Infante JR, Matsubayashi H, Sato N et al. Peritumoral fibroblast SPARC expression and patient outcome with resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma. J Clin Oncol 2007; 25: 319-325.
  5. Von Hoff DD, Ramanathan RK, Borad MJ et al. Gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel is an active regimen in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer: a phase I/II trial. J Clin Oncol 2011; 29: 4548-4554.
  6. Budczies J, Klauschen F, Sinn BV et al. Cutoff Finder: a comprehensive and straightforward Web application enabling rapid biomarker cutoff optimization. PLoS One 2012; 7: e51862.
  7. Cox DR. Regression models and life-tables. J R Stat Soc Ser B (Methodol) 1972; 34: 187-220.
  8. Mantoni TS, Schendel RR, Rodel F et al. Stromal SPARC expression and patient survival after chemoradiation for non-resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Cancer Biol Ther 2008; 7: 1806-1815.
  9. Miyoshi K, Sato N, Ohuchida K et al. SPARC mRNA expression as a prognostic marker for pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients. Anticancer Res 2010; 30: 867-871.
  10. Neoptolemos JP, Stocken DD, Friess H et al. A randomized trial of chemoradiotherapy and chemotherapy after resection of pancreatic cancer. N Engl J Med 2004; 350: 1200-1210.
  11. Neoptolemos JP, Stocken DD, Bassi C et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy with fluorouracil plus folinic acid vs gemcitabine following pancreatic cancer resection: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2010; 304: 1073-1081.
  12. Bradshaw AD. Diverse biological functions of the SPARC family of proteins. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 2012; 44: 480-488.
  13. Neuzillet C, Tijeras-Raballand A, Cros J et al. Stromal expression of SPARC in pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Cancer Metastasis Rev 2013; 32: 147-167.
  14. Puolakkainen PA, Brekken RA, Muneer S et al. Enhanced growth of pancreatic tumors in SPARC-null mice is associated with decreased deposition of extracellular matrix and reduced tumor cell apoptosis. Mol Cancer Res 2004; 2: 215-224.
  15. Arnold SA, Rivera LB, Miller AF et al. Lack of host SPARC enhances vascular function and tumor spread in an orthotopic murine model of pancreatic carcinoma. Dis Model Mech 2010; 3: 57-72.
  16. Sato N, Fukushima N, Maehara N et al. SPARC/osteonectin is a frequent target for aberrant methylation in pancreatic adenocarcinoma and a mediator of tumor- stromal interactions. Oncogene 2003; 22: 5021-5030.
  17. Gao J, Song J, Huang H et al. Methylation of the SPARC gene promoter and its clinical implication in pancreatic cancer. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 2010; 29: 28.
  18. Gradishar WJ, Tjulandin S, Davidson N et al. Phase III trial of nanoparticle albumin- bound paclitaxel compared with polyethylated castor oil-based paclitaxel in women with breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2005; 23: 7794-7803.
  19. Desai N, Trieu V, Yao Z et al. Increased antitumor activity, intratumor paclitaxel concentrations, and endothelial cell transport of cremophor-free, albumin-bound paclitaxel, ABI-007, compared with cremophor-based paclitaxel. Clin Cancer Res 2006; 12: 1317-1324.
  20. Frese KK, Neesse A, Cook N et al. nab-Paclitaxel potentiates gemcitabine activity by reducing cytidine deaminase levels in a mouse model of pancreatic cancer. Cancer Discov 2012; 2: 260-269.
  21. Desai N, Trieu V, Damascelli B et al. SPARC expression correlates with tumor response to albumin-bound paclitaxel in head and neck cancer patients. Transl Oncol 2009; 2: 59-64.
  22. Feig C, Gopinathan A, Neesse A et al. The pancreas cancer microenvironment. Clin Cancer Res 2012; 18: 4266-4276. references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Goldstein, J., Tran, B., Ensor, J., Gibbs, P., Wong, H. L., Wong, S. F., Vilar, E., Tie, J., Broaddus, R., Kopetz, S., Desai, J., & Overman, M. J.
Affiliations
  • The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US)
  • The Royal Melbourne Hospital (AU)
Corresponding author
Overman, M.J.
Venue
Annals of Oncology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-05
Volume
25
Issue
5
Pages
1032-1038
ISSN
0923-7534 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2140143664
Cited by
288
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 33 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 4
FWCI
12.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annals of Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (UL1TR000371)
  • National Cancer Institute (P30CA016672)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Genetic factors in colorectal cancer
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
Keywords
metastatic colorectal cancer, microsatellite instability-high, BRAF V600E mutation, metastasectomy, systemic chemotherapy, overall survival, prognostic factors, stage IV disease, fluoropyrimidine, oxaliplatin, irinotecan
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Combined Modality Therapy, Female, Humans, Liver Neoplasms, Male, Middle Aged, Prognosis, Retrospective Studies, Colorectal Neoplasms, Multivariate Analysis, Proportional Hazards Models, Treatment Outcome, Mutation, Missense, Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf, Kaplan-Meier Estimate, Microsatellite Instability, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review