The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Methylated lysine 79 of histone H3 targets 53BP1 to DNA double-strand breaks
Abstract
The mechanisms by which eukaryotic cells sense DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) in order to initiate checkpoint responses are poorly understood. 53BP1 is a conserved checkpoint protein with properties of a DNA DSB sensor. Here, we solved the structure of the domain of 53BP1 that recruits it to sites of DSBs. This domain consists of two tandem tudor folds with a deep pocket at their interface formed by residues conserved in the budding yeast Rad9 and fission yeast Rhp9/Crb2 orthologues. In vitro, the 53BP1 tandem tudor domain bound histone H3 methylated on Lys 79 using residues that form the walls of the pocket; these residues were also required for recruitment of 53BP1 to DSBs. Suppression of DOT1L, the enzyme that methylates Lys 79 of histone H3, also inhibited recruitment of 53BP1 to DSBs. Because methylation of histone H3 Lys 79 was unaltered in response to DNA damage, we propose that 53BP1 senses DSBs indirectly through changes in higher-order chromatin structure that expose the 53BP1 binding site.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“dual inhibitors of LSD1 and HDACs, which provide more effective and sustained inhibition of the REST corepressor 1 (CoREST) complex than existing class I HDAC inhibitors”
From The roles of DNA, RNA and histone methylation in ageing and cancer (2019) · cites this paper as [207]
Citations
Cites
Crystal structure of the nucleosome core particle at 2.8 Å resolution
Luger, K., Mäder, A. W., Richmond, R. K., Sargent, D. F., & Richmond, T. J. (1997) · Nature · doi:10.1038/38444 · Cited by 9,466
DNA damage activates ATM through intermolecular autophosphorylation and dimer dissociation
Bakkenist, C. J., & Kastan, M. B. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01368 · Cited by 3,466
Megabase Chromatin Domains Involved in DNA Double-Strand Breaks in Vivo
Rogakou, E. P., Boon, C., Redon, C., & Bonner, W. M. (1999) · The Journal of Cell Biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.146.5.905 · Cited by 2,422
The RAD9 Gene Controls the Cell Cycle Response to DNA Damage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Weinert, T. A., & Hartwell, L. H. (1988) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.3291120 · Cited by 1,171
Histone H2AX phosphorylation is dispensable for the initial recognition of DNA breaks
Celeste, A., Fernandez-Capetillo, O., Kruhlak, M. J., Pilch, D. R., Staudt, D. W., Lee, A., Bonner, R. F., Bonner, W. M., & Nussenzweig, A. (2003) · Nature Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/ncb1004 · Cited by 989
Schultz, L. B., Chehab, N. H., Malikzay, A., & Halazonetis, T. D. (2000) · The Journal of Cell Biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.151.7.1381 · Cited by 916
Self-citationHistone methylation in transcriptional control
Kouzarides, T. (2002) · Current Opinion in Genetics & Development · doi:10.1016/s0959-437x(02)00287-3 · Cited by 908
Methylation of H3-Lysine 79 Is Mediated by a New Family of HMTases without a SET Domain
Feng, Q. F., Wang, H., Ng, H., Erdjument‐Bromage, H., Tempst, P., Struhl, K., & Zhang, Y. (2002) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/s0960-9822(02)00901-6 · Cited by 897
Dot1p Modulates Silencing in Yeast by Methylation of the Nucleosome Core
van Leeuwen, F., Gafken, P. R., & Gottschling, D. E. (2002) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(02)00759-6 · Cited by 853
Interaction of Human DNA Polymerase η with Monoubiquitinated PCNA
Kannouche, P. L., Wing, J., & Lehmann, A. R. (2004) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/s1097-2765(04)00259-x · Cited by 845
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 401–500 of 883
An epigenetic code for DNA damage repair pathways?
Hassa, P. O., & Hottiger, M. O. (2005) · Biochemistry and Cell Biology · doi:10.1139/o05-034 · Cited by 48
“Moreover, a recent report suggested that H3–K79 methylation is required for 53BP1 recruitment to DSBs (Huyen et al. 2004).”
BackgroundInfluentialHistone post-translational modifications and the response to DNA double-strand breaks
Würtele, H., & Verreault, A. (2006) · Current Opinion in Cell Biology · doi:10.1016/j.ceb.2006.02.008 · Cited by 47
The DNA damage response—Repair or despair?
Ljungman, M. E. (2010) · Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis · doi:10.1002/em.20597 · Cited by 49
“RNF8 then ubiquitylates histones in the chromatin surrounding the damage, thereby recruiting BRCA1 via the RAP80 protein and 53BP1 via chromatin structure alterations [Huyen et al., 2004].”
MethodRNF8-dependent and RNF8-independent Regulation of 53BP1 in Response to DNA Damage
Sakasai, R., & Tibbetts, R. S. (2008) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m710197200 · Cited by 46
DNA Damage Checkpoints and Cancer
Shimada, M., & Nakanishi, M. (2006) · Journal of Molecular Histology · doi:10.1007/s10735-006-9039-4 · Cited by 45
“Methylation of lysine 79 on histone H3 which is carried out by Dot1L is important for the recruitment of 53BP1 to sites of DNA damage (Huyen et al. 2004).”
BackgroundVidi, P., Chandramouly, G., Gray, M., Wang, L., Liu, E., Kim, J. J., Roukos, V., Bissell, M. J., Moghe, P. V., & Lelièvre, S. A. (2012) · Journal of Cell Science · doi:10.1242/jcs.089177 · Cited by 50
“Indeed, the initial recruitment of 53BP1 at DSBs does not depend on cH2AX (Celeste et al., 2003) but, rather, on the methylation of histones H3K79 or H4K20 (Huyen et al., 2004; Sanders et al., 2004).”
BackgroundPTIP Regulates 53BP1 and SMC1 at the DNA Damage Sites
Wu, J., Prindle, M. J., Dressler, G. R., & Yu, X. (2009) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m109.002527 · Cited by 46
Control of histone methylation and genome stability by PTIP
Munoz, I. M., & Rouse, J. W. (2009) · EMBO Reports · doi:10.1038/embor.2009.21 · Cited by 44
“For example, the methylation of H3K79 by DOT1L enables the binding of the Tudor domains of 53BP1, which contributes to 53BP1 recruitment to DSBs”
BackgroundHistone modifications in DNA damage response
Cao, L., Shen, C., & Zhu, W. (2016) · Science China Life Sciences · doi:10.1007/s11427-016-5011-z · Cited by 47
“…is required for the localization of 53BP1 around damaged DNA and 53BP1 tandem Tudor domain binds to methylated H3K79 directly, resulting in the induction of 53BP1 phosphorylation and checkpoint activation (Giannattasio et al., 2005; Huyen et al., 2004; Wakeman et al., 2012; Wysocki et al., 2005).”
Chang, H., Chen, H., Zhang, L., Wang, Y., Xie, X., Zhang, Y., & Quan, F. (2019) · Molecular Reproduction and Development · doi:10.1002/mrd.23247 · Cited by 45
Histone methyltransferase DOT1L controls state-specific identity during B cell differentiation
Aslam, M. A., Alemdehy, M. F., Kwesi‐Maliepaard, E. M., Cagánová, M., Pardieck, I. N., van den Brand, T., Muhaimin, F. I., van Welsem, T., de Rink, I., Song, J., et al. (2021) · EMBO Reports · doi:10.15252/embr.202051184 · Cited by 43
Moreno, N. S., Liu, J., Haas, K. M., Parker, L. L., Chakraborty, C., Kron, S. J., Hodges, K. B., Miller, L. D., Langefeld, C. D., Robinson, J. P., et al. (2019) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkz138 · Cited by 44
“GFP-fused to 53BP1 containing amino acids 1–34 and 1220–1711 (30) was stably expressed in HEK293T cells under the Tet-On promoter.”
MethodThe Chromatin Landscape Channels DNA Double-Strand Breaks to Distinct Repair Pathways
Chen, Z., & Tyler, J. K. (2022) · Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology · doi:10.3389/fcell.2022.909696 · Cited by 44
Burgoyne, P. S., Mahadevaiah, S. K., & Turner, J. M. A. (2007) · BioEssays · doi:10.1002/bies.20639 · Cited by 44
Altering the chromatin landscape for nucleotide excision repair
Chaudhuri, R. N., & Smerdon, M. J. (2009) · Mutation Research/Reviews in Mutation Research · doi:10.1016/j.mrrev.2009.01.002 · Cited by 42
Dirk, L. M. A., Flynn, E. M., Dietzel, K., Couture, J., Trievel, R. C., & Houtz, R. L. (2007) · Biochemistry · doi:10.1021/bi6023644 · Cited by 44
Dai, C., Sun, F., Zhu, C., & Hu, X. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0063054 · Cited by 43
“We checked the levels of DNA damage in cells exposed to glucose deprivation with lactic acidosis followed by nutrient restoration, using immunofluorescence staining for c-H2AX and 53BP1 [42,43], scored according to Lukas et al [44].”
MethodSabra, M., Texier, P., Maalouf, J. E., & Lomonte, P. (2013) · Journal of Cell Science · doi:10.1242/jcs.126003 · Cited by 43
Moureau, S., Luessing, J., Harte, E. C., Voisin, M., & Lowndes, N. F. (2016) · Open Biology · doi:10.1098/rsob.160225 · Cited by 45
Shimojo, H., Sano, N., Moriwaki, Y., Okuda, M., Horikoshi, M., & Nishimura, Y. (2008) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2008.03.021 · Cited by 43
Tripathi, V., Kaur, S., & Sengupta, S. (2007) · Carcinogenesis · doi:10.1093/carcin/bgm238 · Cited by 44
Splinter, J., Jakob, B., Lang, M., Yano, K., Engelhardt, J., Hell, S. W., Chen, D. J., Durante, M., & Taucher-Scholz, G. (2010) · Mutagenesis · doi:10.1093/mutage/geq005 · Cited by 43
“As 53BP1 specifically binds to a histone modification (37) and RPA binds to ssDNA (38) most probably unwound from nucleosomes, this might explain the nearby but not overlapping foci.”
BackgroundInhibition of the Histone H3K27 Demethylase UTX Enhances Tumor Cell Radiosensitivity
Rath, B. H., Waung, I., Camphausen, K. A., & Tofilon, P. J. (2018) · Molecular Cancer Therapeutics · doi:10.1158/1535-7163.mct-17-1053 · Cited by 42
“Dimethylation of histone H3 on lysine 79 (H3K79me2) and H4 on lysine 20 (H4K20me2) have been linked to the recruitment of 53BP1 to DSBs (12, 13), neither of those histone modifications, however, was induced by DNA damage (14).”
BackgroundChromatin modulation and the DNA damage response
Costelloe, T., Fitzgerald, J., Murphy, N., Flaus, A., & Lowndes, N. F. (2006) · Experimental Cell Research · doi:10.1016/j.yexcr.2006.06.031 · Cited by 41
“Chromatin modulation and the DNA damage response”
DNA damage response signaling: A common link between cancer and cardiovascular diseases
Nikfarjam, S., & Singh, K. K. (2022) · Cancer Medicine · doi:10.1002/cam4.5274 · Cited by 45
The Fragile X Protein and Genome Function
Dockendorff, T. C., & Labrador, M. (2018) · Molecular Neurobiology · doi:10.1007/s12035-018-1122-9 · Cited by 41
“been proposed to explain accessibility of 53BP1 to DNA breaks [63].”
BackgroundDNA damage in leukocytes after internal ex-vivo irradiation of blood with the α-emitter Ra-223
Schumann, S., Eberlein, U., Muhtadi, R., Laßmann, M., & Scherthan, H. (2018) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-018-20364-7 · Cited by 40
Fitzgerald, J., Moureau, S., Drogaris, P., O’Connell, E., Abshiru, N. A., Verreault, A., Thibault, P., Grenon, M., & Lowndes, N. F. (2011) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0014714 · Cited by 41
“53BP1 interacts with H3K79 methylation [20] and also affects gene expression.”
BackgroundInfluentialLee, S., Park, E., Lee, H.-S., Lee, Y., & Kwon, J. (2012) · Molecules and Cells · doi:10.1007/s10059-012-0112-4 · Cited by 42
“For example, 53BP1, involved in DNA damage checkpoint activation, binds to methylLys-79 of H3 at DSBs using its tudor domain (Huyen et al., 2004).”
BackgroundKupershmit, I., Khoury-Haddad, H., Awwad, S. W., Guttmann‐Raviv, N., & Ayoub, N. (2014) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gku253 · Cited by 40
The histone methyltransferase DOT1L is a new epigenetic regulator of pulmonary fibrosis
Yang, D., Xu, P., Su, H., Zhong, W., Xu, J., Su, Z., & Liu, X. (2022) · Cell Death and Disease · doi:10.1038/s41419-021-04365-5 · Cited by 39
“This histone methylation typically functions in transcriptional regulation [15, 16], telomeric silencing [17], cellcycle regulation [18], and DNA damage repair [19].”
BackgroundEvolving insights: how DNA repair pathways impact cancer evolution
Zhou, J., Zhou, X. A., Zhang, N., & Wang, J. (2020) · Cancer Biology and Medicine · doi:10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2020.0177 · Cited by 40
Role of Histone Methylation in Maintenance of Genome Integrity
Mushtaq, A., Mir, U. S., Hunt, C. R., Pandita, S., Tantray, W. W., Bhat, A., PANDITA, R. K., Altaf, M., & Pandita, T. K. (2021) · Genes · doi:10.3390/genes12071000 · Cited by 45
“Acetylation of H2AK15 by TIP60 prevents its ubiquitylation, which is also a recognition site for 53BP1 [20,25,43].”
BackgroundChoi, S.-W., & Friso, S. (2009) · CRC Press eBooks · doi:10.1201/9781420063561 · Cited by 39
Ho, L., Sinha, A., Verzi, M. P., Bernt, K. M., Armstrong, S. A., & Shivdasani, R. A. (2013) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.01463-12 · Cited by 38
“Dot1-dependent H3K79 methylation is associated with telomere silencing and meiotic checkpoint controls (16), DNA repair (17), and modulation of constitutive heterochromatin (15), but its role in transcriptional control has drawn particular attention.”
BackgroundStructural Plasticity of Methyllysine Recognition by the Tandem Tudor Domain of 53BP1
Tong, Q., Cui, G., Botuyan, M. V., Rothbart, S. B., Hayashi, R., Musselman, C. A., Singh, N., Appella, E., Strahl, B. D., Mer, G., et al. (2015) · Structure · doi:10.1016/j.str.2014.11.013 · Cited by 39
“and weakly associates with some other dimethylated histones (Botuyan et al., 2006; Huyen et al., 2004; Kim et al., 2006), however a comprehensive analysis of the TTD substrates has not been performed.”
InfluentialThe Role of Histone Lysine Methylation in the Response of Mammalian Cells to Ionizing Radiation
Nisio, E. D., Lupo, G., Licursi, V., & Negri, R. (2021) · Frontiers in Genetics · doi:10.3389/fgene.2021.639602 · Cited by 39
“So far, the role of H3K79 methylation in DDR has been mainly related to its ability to target 53BP1 to DSBs (Huyen et al., 2004; Figure 3A).”
BackgroundFeng, J., & Meng, X. (2022) · Frontiers in Pharmacology · doi:10.3389/fphar.2022.946811 · Cited by 43
“Furthermore, H4K16ac upregulation promotes in vivo H3K79 methylation (Altaf et al., 2007), and the latter has been suggested to disrupt transcriptional elongation, DNA damage response, and telomeric silencing (Huyen et al., 2004).”
BackgroundHistone tails: Directing the chromatin response to DNA damage
Greenberg, R. A. (2011) · FEBS Letters · doi:10.1016/j.febslet.2011.05.037 · Cited by 36
“sharing γH2AX IRIF dependency, BRCA1 and 53BP1 display different IRIF kinetics and utilize distinct recognition elements for IRIF formation[23-26].”
BackgroundRadiation biology and oncology in the genomic era
Kerns, S. L., Chuang, K., Hall, W. A., Werner, Z. A., Chen, Y., D, H. O. M., West, C., & Rosenstein, B. S. (2018) · British Journal of Radiology · doi:10.1259/bjr.20170949 · Cited by 37
DNA Double Strand Break Repair and Its Control by Nucleosome Remodeling
Karl, L., Peritore, M., Galanti, L., & Pfander, B. (2022) · Frontiers in Genetics · doi:10.3389/fgene.2021.821543 · Cited by 42
“Notably, Rad9, 53BP1, as well as the fission yeast orthologue Crb2 associate with chromatin and have all been shown to bind to nucleosomes, where they recognize specific histone modifications (Huyen et al., 2004; Nakamura et al., 2004; Sanders et al., 2004; Wysocki et al., 2005; Botuyan et al., 2006; Du et al., 2006;…”
BackgroundCompetition effect in DNA damage response
Greubel, C., Hable, V., Drexler, G. A., Hauptner, A., Dietzel, S., Strickfaden, H., Baur, I., Krücken, R., Cremer, T. J., Dollinger, G., et al. (2008) · Radiation and Environmental Biophysics · doi:10.1007/s00411-008-0182-z · Cited by 37
“matin alterations [8, 9].”
BackgroundStaropoli, J. F., Huo, L., Chun, S. J., Allaire, N., Cullen, P. F., Thai, A., Fleet, C., Hua, Y., Bennett, C. F., Krainer, A. R., et al. (2015) · Genomics · doi:10.1016/j.ygeno.2015.01.007 · Cited by 36
Wang, H., Sundaram, P., Kenjale, H., Grantham, J., & Timmons, L. (2008) · Genetics · doi:10.1534/genetics.107.085472 · Cited by 36
The role of H3K79 methylation in transcription and the DNA damage response
Ljungman, M. E., Parks, L., Hulbatte, R. S., & Bedi, K. (2017) · Mutation Research/Reviews in Mutation Research · doi:10.1016/j.mrrev.2017.11.001 · Cited by 36
p53 regulated senescence mechanism and role of its modulators in age-related disorders
Pawge, G., & Khatik, G. L. (2021) · Biochemical Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.bcp.2021.114651 · Cited by 38
Regulation of the DNA Damage Response to DSBs by Post-Translational Modifications
Oberle, C., & Blattner, C. (2010) · Current Genomics · doi:10.2174/138920210791110979 · Cited by 37
“Within a few minutes after introduction of a DSB, H3 becomes methylated at lysine 79 [66].”
BackgroundTikoo, S., & Sengupta, S. (2010) · Genome Integrity · doi:10.1186/2041-9414-1-14 · Cited by 37
“53BP1 accumulates at IRIF by interacting with methylated histones H3 and H4 via its Tudor domain [33, 34 ].”
BackgroundKashino, G., Kondoh, T., Nariyama, N., Umetani, K., Ohigashi, T., Shinohara, K., Kurihara, A., Fukumoto, M., Tanaka, H., Maruhashi, A., et al. (2009) · International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics · doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.09.060 · Cited by 35
Ubiquitin and SUMO signalling in DNA repair
Thomson, T. M., & Guerra‐Rebollo, M. (2010) · Biochemical Society Transactions · doi:10.1042/bst0380116 · Cited by 34
Homologous Recombination in Eukaryotes
Amunugama, R., & Fishel, R. A. (2012) · Progress in molecular biology and translational science · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-387665-2.00007-9 · Cited by 39
Ontoso, D., Kauppi, L., Keeney, S., & San-Segundo, P. A. (2013) · Chromosoma · doi:10.1007/s00412-013-0438-5 · Cited by 35
“…activity is involved in embryonic development and differentiation (Jones et al. 2008; Barry et al. 2009), cardiac function (Nguyen et al. 2011), hematopoiesis (Feng et al. 2010; Jo et al. 2011), cell proliferation and aging (Kim et al. 2012b) and chondrogenesis (Castaño Betancourt et al. 2012).”
Chromatin modifications and DNA double-strand breaks: the current state of play
Karagiannis, T. C., & El‐Osta, A. (2006) · Leukemia · doi:10.1038/sj.leu.2404478 · Cited by 36
Protein Phosphatase 5 Regulates the Function of 53BP1 after Neocarzinostatin-induced DNA Damage
Kang, Y., Lee, J.-H., Hoan, N. N., Sohn, H. M., Chang, I. Y., & You, H. J. (2009) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m809272200 · Cited by 35
The accumulation of DNA repair defects is the molecular origin of carcinogenesis
Cha, H., & Yim, H. (2013) · Tumor Biology · doi:10.1007/s13277-013-1038-y · Cited by 34
“Methylation on the histone H3 and H4 is suggested to be an alternative histone modification for recruiting DSB repair factors at the damage sites [54, 55].”
BackgroundTargeting the epigenetics of the DNA damage response in breast cancer
Montenegro, M. F., González-Guerrero, R., Sánchez‐del‐Campo, L., Piñero, A., Cabezas‐Herrera, J., & Rodríguez‐López, J. N. (2016) · Cell Death and Disease · doi:10.1038/cddis.2016.85 · Cited by 34
Bártová, E., Legartová, S., Dundr, M., & Suchánková, J. (2019) · Aging · doi:10.18632/aging.101917 · Cited by 36
“However, this epigenetic landscape enables the binding of the 53BP1 protein to damaged chromatin [107].”
BackgroundLee, H., Kwak, H., Cho, I., Park, S. H., & Lee, C. H. (2008) · Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications · doi:10.1016/j.bbrc.2008.10.150 · Cited by 34
Interplay between modifications of chromatin and meiotic recombination hotspots
Brachet, E., Sommermeyer, V., & Borde, V. (2011) · Biology of the Cell · doi:10.1111/boc.201100113 · Cited by 39
“Two other histone PTMs, dimethylated lysine 20 of histone H4 (in mammals) and methylated lysine 79 of histone H3, constitutively present in a large fraction of chromatin, help recruiting checkpoint mediators (Rad9 or its human and fission yeast orthologs 53BP1 and Crb2) at DSBs (Botuyan et al., 2006; Huyen et al., 200…”
BackgroundChromatin and the DNA damage response
Lydall, D. A., & Whitehall, S. K. (2005) · DNA repair · doi:10.1016/j.dnarep.2005.06.007 · Cited by 35
Tumor Promoting or Tumor Suppressing of NF-κ B, a Matter of Cell Context Dependency
Chen, F., Beezhold, K., & Castranova, V. (2008) · International Reviews of Immunology · doi:10.1080/08830180802130327 · Cited by 32
Collura, A., Blaisonneau, J., Baldacci, G., & Francesconi, S. (2005) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.25.17.7889-7899.2005 · Cited by 33
“The sequence similarity concerns the C-terminal BRCT domains, which are protein-protein interaction domains (5), and the two tandem Tudor folds in the central part of the proteins, which are protein-protein and protein-DNA interaction domains (8, 15 ).”
BackgroundChromatin Modifications in DNA Repair
Morrison, A. J., & Shen, X. (2006) · Results and problems in cell differentiation · doi:10.1007/400_008 · Cited by 33
“Researchers investigating the involvement of methylated lysine 79 in histone H3 decreased expression of Dot1 and found that there were reduced levels of 53BP1 immunofluorescent foci following ionizing radiation treatment (Huyen et al. 2004).”
BackgroundTranscription-coupled DNA double-strand break repair
Guha, S., & Bhaumik, S. R. (2021) · DNA repair · doi:10.1016/j.dnarep.2021.103211 · Cited by 34
Djuzenova, C. S., Zimmermann, M., Katzer, A., Fiedler, V., Distel, L. V., Gasser, M., Waaga-Gasser, A.-M., Flentje, M. P., & Polat, B. (2015) · BMC Cancer · doi:10.1186/s12885-015-1890-9 · Cited by 32
“In addition, the foci numbers of 53BP1, a sensor of DNA damage [26], were compared between 10 healthy controls and 47 RC patients.”
BackgroundInfluentialO’Connor, C. M., DiMaggio, P. A., Shenk, T. E., & Garcia, B. A. (2014) · Molecular & Cellular Proteomics · doi:10.1074/mcp.m114.039792 · Cited by 33
“As H3K79 methylation levels do not change upon DNA damage (36), it is tempting to speculate that increased methylation at this site during HCMV infection”
BackgroundTudor domain‐containing proteins of Drosophila melanogaster
Ying, M., & Chen, D. (2012) · Development Growth & Differentiation · doi:10.1111/j.1440-169x.2011.01308.x · Cited by 31
“As a key transducer of the DNA damage checkpoint signal during mitosis, methylation-dependent direct binding of two tandem Tudor domains to histone H3 of TP53BP1 maintains the genome process (Huyen et al. 2004).”
BackgroundPark, J. W., Shin, M.-K., & Lambert, P. F. (2013) · Oncogene · doi:10.1038/onc.2013.327 · Cited by 31
“We used an alternative marker for DSBs (37), p53 binding protein 1 (53BP1), to indirectly measure the level of DNA damage in these same tissues.”
Method53BP1 Contributes to Igh Locus Chromatin Topology during Class Switch Recombination
Feldman, S., Wuerffel, R., Achour, I., Wang, L., Carpenter, P. B., & Kenter, A. L. (2017) · The Journal of Immunology · doi:10.4049/jimmunol.1601947 · Cited by 35
Keep moving and stay in a good shape to find your homologous recombination partner
Bordelet, H., & Dubrana, K. (2018) · Current Genetics · doi:10.1007/s00294-018-0873-1 · Cited by 34
POGZ promotes homology‐directed DNA repair in an HP1‐dependent manner
Heath, J., Simo‐Cheyou, E. R., Findlay, S., Luo, V. M., Carpio, E. P., Lee, J., Djerir, B., Chen, X., Morin, T., Lebeau, B., et al. (2021) · EMBO Reports · doi:10.15252/embr.202051041 · Cited by 33
“On one hand, 53BP1 relies on both H4K20me 2 /me 3-and RNF168-mediated ubiquitination of H2A variants for its recruitment to DSBs (Huyen et al , 2004; Botuyan et al , 2006; Fradet-Turcotte et al , 2013).”
Lancelot, N., Charier, G., Couprie, J., Duband‐Goulet, I., Alpha‐Bazin, B., Quéméneur, É., Ma, É., Marsolier‐Kergoat, M., Ropars, V., Charbonnier, J., et al. (2007) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkm607 · Cited by 31
“In the X-ray structure of human 53BP1 tandem tudor domain, the corresponding four residues form a b-sheet with the same residues of another 53BP1 molecule (16).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialHossain, M., Korde, R., Singh, S. S., Mohmmed, A., Dasaradhi, P. V., Chauhan, V. S., & Malhotra, P. (2008) · International Journal of Parasitology · doi:10.1016/j.ijpara.2007.09.018 · Cited by 30
Hake, S. B. (2011) · doi:10.1002/9780470959824.ch3 · Cited by 31
Hu, Y., Wang, C., Huang, K., Xia, F., Parvin, J. D., & Mondal, N. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0110522 · Cited by 32
“53BP1 localization to the sites of DNA damage requires the recognition of histone methylation, in particular H4K20me2 [28] by its tandem Tudor domain [29,30].”
BackgroundChromatin modifications and chromatin remodeling during DNA repair in budding yeast
Tsabar, M., & Haber, J. E. (2013) · Current Opinion in Genetics & Development · doi:10.1016/j.gde.2012.11.015 · Cited by 32
Nuclear lamina dysfunction triggers a germline stem cell checkpoint
Barton, L. J., Duan, T., Ke, W., Luttinger, A., Lovander, K. E., Soshnev, A. A., & Geyer, P. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-06277-z · Cited by 27
Frigerio, C., Nisio, E. D., Galli, M., Colombo, C. V., Negri, R., & Clerici, M. (2023) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms24043248 · Cited by 29
Glioma and post-translational modifications: A complex relationship
Pienkowski, T., Kowalczyk, T., Cysewski, D., Kretowski, A. J., & Ciborowski, M. (2023) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Reviews on Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.bbcan.2023.189009 · Cited by 30
An Acetyl-Methyl Switch Drives a Conformational Change in p53
Tong, Q., Mazur, S. J., Rincón‐Arano, H., Rothbart, S. B., Kuznetsov, D. M., Cui, G., Liu, W. H., Gete, Y. G., Klein, B. J., Jenkins, L. M. M., et al. (2015) · Structure · doi:10.1016/j.str.2014.12.010 · Cited by 29
“The dimethylated p53K382 species is recognized by the TTD of 53BP1, a DNA damage response protein and a p53 co-factor that also binds to H4K20me2 (histone 4 dimethylated at K20) (Botuyan et al., 2006; Huang et al., 2007; Huyen et al., 2004; Kachirskaia et al., 2008).”
BackgroundVempati, R. K. (2011) · Molecular Biology Reports · doi:10.1007/s11033-011-0739-9 · Cited by 29
“H3K79 methylation levels doesn’t change in response to DNA damage, instead, chromatin remodeling at the site of DNA damage expose this methylated residue for the efficient recruitment of 53BP1 [ 7 ].”
BackgroundGenome damage in induced pluripotent stem cells: Assessing the mechanisms and their consequences
Hussein, S. M. I., Elbaz, J., & Nagy, A. (2012) · BioEssays · doi:10.1002/bies.201200114 · Cited by 29
Sundaravinayagam, D., Rahjouei, A., Andreani, M., Tupiņa, D., Balasubramanian, S., Saha, T., Delgado-Benito, V., Coralluzzo, V., Daumke, O., & Virgilio, M. D. (2019) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2019.06.035 · Cited by 29
“, 2017), and 53BP1 is recruited to the damaged chromatin via the direct bivalent interaction of its Tudor domain and ubiquitination-dependent recruitment (UDR) motif with H4K20me2 and H2AK15ub histone modifications, respectively (Botuyan et al., 2006; Fradet-Turcotte et al., 2013; Huyen et al., 2004; Sanders et al., 2…”
Portillo‐Ledesma, S., & Tamar Schlick, A. (2019) · Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Computational Molecular Science · doi:10.1002/wcms.1434 · Cited by 30
Park, P. H., Yamamoto, T. M., Li, H., Alcivar, A. L., Xia, B., Wang, Y., Bernhardy, A. J., Turner, K. M., Kossenkov, A. V., Watson, Z. L., et al. (2019) · Molecular Cancer Therapeutics · doi:10.1158/1535-7163.mct-17-0256 · Cited by 30
“To date, the only known “reader” of the DOT1Ldependent H3K79 methylation is the tumor suppressor p53-binding protein 1, which has established roles in dictating specific DNA repair pathways (42).”
BackgroundMobility and Repair of Damaged DNA: Random or Directed?
Oshidari, R., Mekhail, K., & Seeber, A. (2019) · Trends in Cell Biology · doi:10.1016/j.tcb.2019.11.003 · Cited by 31
Protein phosphatase 5 is necessary for ATR-mediated DNA repair
Kang, Y., Cheong, H.-M., Lee, J.-H., Song, P. I., Lee, K., Kim, S.-Y., Jun, J. Y., & You, H. J. (2010) · Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications · doi:10.1016/j.bbrc.2010.12.005 · Cited by 31
Specific Association of Mouse MDC1/NFBD1 with NBS1 at Sites of DNA-Damage
Lee, A. C., Fernández-Capetillo, Ó., Jackson, S. P., & Nussenzweig, A. (2004) · Cell Cycle · doi:10.4161/cc.4.1.1354 · Cited by 29
DNA damage response: the players, the network and the role in tumor suppression.
Rai, R., Peng, G., Li, K., & Lin, S. Y. (2007) · PubMed · Cited by 29
Guerra, B., Iwabuchi, K., & Issinger, O. (2013) · Cancer Letters · doi:10.1016/j.canlet.2013.11.008 · Cited by 31
Salt Promotes Protonation of Amine Groups at Air/Water Interface
Sung, W., Avazbaeva, Z., & Kim, D. (2017) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters · doi:10.1021/acs.jpclett.7b01198 · Cited by 28
Rad9/53BP1 protects stalled replication forks from degradation in Mec1/ATR‐defective cells
Villa, M., Bonetti, D., Carraro, M., & Longhese, M. P. (2018) · EMBO Reports · doi:10.15252/embr.201744910 · Cited by 26
A bi-terminal protein ligation strategy to probe chromatin structure during DNA damage
Kilic, S., Boichenko, I., Lechner, C. C., & Fierz, B. (2018) · Chemical Science · doi:10.1039/c8sc00681d · Cited by 28
Kim, H. S., Rhee, D. K., & Jang, Y. K. (2008) · Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications · doi:10.1016/j.bbrc.2008.01.104 · Cited by 28
Suryadinata, R., Sadowski, M. C., Steel, R., & Šarčević, B. (2010) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m110.198473 · Cited by 28
Gospodinov, A. G., & Herceg, Z. (2012) · Mutation Research/Reviews in Mutation Research · doi:10.1016/j.mrrev.2012.10.001 · Cited by 28
Mandemaker, I. K., Vermeulen, W., & Marteijn, J. A. F. (2014) · Nucleus · doi:10.4161/nucl.29085 · Cited by 28
Insights into the Conserved Regulatory Mechanisms of Human and Yeast Aging
Dahiya, R., Mohammad, T., Alajmi, M. F., Rehman, M. T., Hasan, G. M., Hussain, A., & Hassan, M. I. (2020) · Biomolecules · doi:10.3390/biom10060882 · Cited by 30
“In both yeast and humans, dimethylation of H4K20 and H3K79 on DNA lesions is required for initiation of DDR through 53BP1 recruitment, and its reduction potentially accelerates the aging [69,70].”
BackgroundBraun, M. A., Costa, P. J., Crisucci, E., & Arndt, K. (2007) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.01947-06 · Cited by 31
Post-translational modifications of lysine in DNA-damage repair
Chatterjee, S., Senapati, P., & Kundu, T. K. (2012) · Essays in Biochemistry · doi:10.1042/bse0520093 · Cited by 28
“As it is present in the core of H3, Lys79 is not accessible to other proteins under normal circumstances, but, upon DNA damage, it gets exposed and different repair-related proteins (53BP1) get recruited at DSB sites [32].”
Metadata
- Authors
- Huyen, Y., Zgheib, O., DiTullio Jr, R. A., Gorgoulis, V. G., Zacharatos, P., Petty, T. J., Sheston, E. A., Mellert, H. S., Stavridi, E. S., & Halazonetis, T. D.
- Affiliations
- The Wistar Institute (US)
- Corresponding author
- Halazonetis, Thanos D.
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2004-11
- Volume
- 432
- Issue
- 7015
- Pages
- 406-411
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- OpenAlex
- W2038451572
- Cited by
- 884
- References
- 30
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 37 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 37 · 2015: 44 · 2014: 34 · 2013: 51 · 2012: 57
- FWCI
- 22.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Nature (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- University of Pennsylvania
- National Cancer Institute
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
- Keywords
- 53BP1, histone H3 lysine 79 methylation, DNA double-strand breaks, DNA damage checkpoint, Tudor domain, DOT1L, chromatin structure, DNA damage recognition, Rad9, protein-DNA interactions
- MeSH terms
- Tumor Suppressor p53-Binding Protein 1, Amino Acid Sequence, Binding Sites, Chromatin, Cross-Linking Reagents, DNA, DNA Damage, Histones, Humans, Lysine, Methylation, Methyltransferases, Models, Molecular, Molecular Sequence Data, Phosphoproteins, Protein Binding, Histone-Lysine N-Methyltransferase, Conserved Sequence, Protein Structure, Tertiary, Cell Line, Tumor, Intracellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review