The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Methylated lysine 79 of histone H3 targets 53BP1 to DNA double-strand breaks
Abstract
The mechanisms by which eukaryotic cells sense DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) in order to initiate checkpoint responses are poorly understood. 53BP1 is a conserved checkpoint protein with properties of a DNA DSB sensor. Here, we solved the structure of the domain of 53BP1 that recruits it to sites of DSBs. This domain consists of two tandem tudor folds with a deep pocket at their interface formed by residues conserved in the budding yeast Rad9 and fission yeast Rhp9/Crb2 orthologues. In vitro, the 53BP1 tandem tudor domain bound histone H3 methylated on Lys 79 using residues that form the walls of the pocket; these residues were also required for recruitment of 53BP1 to DSBs. Suppression of DOT1L, the enzyme that methylates Lys 79 of histone H3, also inhibited recruitment of 53BP1 to DSBs. Because methylation of histone H3 Lys 79 was unaltered in response to DNA damage, we propose that 53BP1 senses DSBs indirectly through changes in higher-order chromatin structure that expose the 53BP1 binding site.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“dual inhibitors of LSD1 and HDACs, which provide more effective and sustained inhibition of the REST corepressor 1 (CoREST) complex than existing class I HDAC inhibitors”
From The roles of DNA, RNA and histone methylation in ageing and cancer (2019) · cites this paper as [207]
Citations
Cites
Crystal structure of the nucleosome core particle at 2.8 Å resolution
Luger, K., Mäder, A. W., Richmond, R. K., Sargent, D. F., & Richmond, T. J. (1997) · Nature · doi:10.1038/38444 · Cited by 9,466
DNA damage activates ATM through intermolecular autophosphorylation and dimer dissociation
Bakkenist, C. J., & Kastan, M. B. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01368 · Cited by 3,466
Megabase Chromatin Domains Involved in DNA Double-Strand Breaks in Vivo
Rogakou, E. P., Boon, C., Redon, C., & Bonner, W. M. (1999) · The Journal of Cell Biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.146.5.905 · Cited by 2,422
The RAD9 Gene Controls the Cell Cycle Response to DNA Damage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Weinert, T. A., & Hartwell, L. H. (1988) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.3291120 · Cited by 1,171
Histone H2AX phosphorylation is dispensable for the initial recognition of DNA breaks
Celeste, A., Fernandez-Capetillo, O., Kruhlak, M. J., Pilch, D. R., Staudt, D. W., Lee, A., Bonner, R. F., Bonner, W. M., & Nussenzweig, A. (2003) · Nature Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/ncb1004 · Cited by 989
Schultz, L. B., Chehab, N. H., Malikzay, A., & Halazonetis, T. D. (2000) · The Journal of Cell Biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.151.7.1381 · Cited by 916
Self-citationHistone methylation in transcriptional control
Kouzarides, T. (2002) · Current Opinion in Genetics & Development · doi:10.1016/s0959-437x(02)00287-3 · Cited by 908
Methylation of H3-Lysine 79 Is Mediated by a New Family of HMTases without a SET Domain
Feng, Q. F., Wang, H., Ng, H., Erdjument‐Bromage, H., Tempst, P., Struhl, K., & Zhang, Y. (2002) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/s0960-9822(02)00901-6 · Cited by 897
Dot1p Modulates Silencing in Yeast by Methylation of the Nucleosome Core
van Leeuwen, F., Gafken, P. R., & Gottschling, D. E. (2002) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(02)00759-6 · Cited by 853
Interaction of Human DNA Polymerase η with Monoubiquitinated PCNA
Kannouche, P. L., Wing, J., & Lehmann, A. R. (2004) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/s1097-2765(04)00259-x · Cited by 845
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 501–600 of 883
Computational analysis of associations between alternative splicing and histone modifications
Shindo, Y., Nozaki, T., Saito, R., & Tomita, M. (2013) · FEBS Letters · doi:10.1016/j.febslet.2013.01.032 · Cited by 27
“The other modification type, H3K79me1, was reported to interact with the Tudor domain of TP53BP1 that interacts with snRNP [22].”
BackgroundThe nucleosome: orchestrating DNA damage signaling and repair within chromatin
Agarwal, P., & Miller, K. M. (2016) · Biochemistry and Cell Biology · doi:10.1139/bcb-2016-0017 · Cited by 28
Structure and function of histone methylation-binding proteins in plants
Liu, Y., & Min, J. (2016) · Biochemical Journal · doi:10.1042/bcj20160123 · Cited by 27
Puebla‐Osorio, N., & Zhu, C. (2008) · Immunologic Research · doi:10.1007/s12026-008-8015-3 · Cited by 27
“The unique ability of 53BP1 to recognize and bind modiWed chromatin structures [105] may provide some”
BackgroundIdentification of Akt Interaction Protein PHF20/TZP That Transcriptionally Regulates p53
Park, S., Kim, D., Dan, H. C., Chen, H., Testa, J. R., & Cheng, J. Q. (2012) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m111.333922 · Cited by 27
“C2H2 zinc finger and PHD finger domains are known to be involved inDNAbinding and protein-protein interactions (62).”
BackgroundRetractedA small ubiquitin binding domain inhibits ubiquitin-dependent protein recruitment to DNA repair foci
Helchowski, C. M., Skow, L., Roberts, K. H., Chute, C. L., & Canman, C. E. (2013) · Cell Cycle · doi:10.4161/cc.26640 · Cited by 28
“53BP1 recognizes dimethylated histone H4 lysine 20 through its Tudor domain and histone H2A K15 monoubiquitinated by RNF168 via a newly identified ubiquitination-dependent recruitment (UDR) motif.(20,21) The ability of 53BP1 to bind efficiently also relies on chromatin reorganization mediated by ubiquitin-dependent re…”
BackgroundiTRAQ analysis of Singapore grouper iridovirus infection in a grouper embryonic cell line
Chen, L. M., Trần, B. N., Lin, Q., Lim, T. K., Wang, F., & Hew, C. (2008) · Journal of General Virology · doi:10.1099/vir.0.2008/003681-0 · Cited by 27
“Recently, histone 2874 Journal of General Virology 89 Downloaded from www.microbiologyresearch.org by IP: 54.70.40.11 On: Wed, 07 Nov 2018 10:40:04 H3 K79 methylation was postulated as an important factor in DNA repair (Huyen et al., 2004) and leukaemic transformation (Okada et al., 2005).”
BackgroundInfluentialNakamura, T., Moser, B. A., Du, L.-L., & Russell, P. R. (2005) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.25.24.10721-10730.2005 · Cited by 27
“Specifically, histone H3-K79 methylation by Dot1 methyltransferase is required for formation of 53BP1 foci in U2OS osteosarcoma cells ( 21 ), while histone H4 lysine-20 (K20) methylation by Set9 methyltransferase is required for formation of Crb2 foci in S. pombe (35).”
BackgroundHowe, C. G., & Gamble, M. V. (2015) · Clinical Epigenetics · doi:10.1186/s13148-014-0041-5 · Cited by 26
“This has been described previously by several groups [3,29].”
Schumann, S., Scherthan, H., Pfestroff, K., Schoof, S., Pfestroff, A., Hartrampf, P. E., Hasenauer, N., Buck, A. K., Luster, M., Port, M., et al. (2021) · European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging · doi:10.1007/s00259-021-05605-8 · Cited by 26
“1 3 the damage sensor 53BP1 to the surrounding chromatin domain [8, 9] where it co-localizes with γ-H2AX [10] to form microscopically visible foci.”
BackgroundAssessing kinetics and recruitment of DNA repair factors using high content screens
Martínez-Pastor, B., da Silveira, G. G., Clarke, T. L., Chung, D., Gu, Y., Cosentino, C., Davidow, L. S., Mata, G., Hassanieh, S., Salsman, J., et al. (2021) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2021.110176 · Cited by 25
“For instance, accumulation and retention of p53-binding protein 1 (53BP1) to DNA lesions requires chromatin modifications such as H3 dimethylated at K79 and H4 dimethylated at K20 that are recognized by 53BP1 through its Tudor domains (Botuyan et al., 2006; Huyen et al., 2004) but also de novo histone modifications su…”
BackgroundWidespread chromatin context-dependencies of DNA double-strand break repair proteins
Vergara, X., Manjón, A. G., de Haas, M., Morris, B., Schep, R., Leemans, C., Friskes, A., Beijersbergen, R. L., Sanders, M. A., Medema, R. H., et al. (2024) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-49232-x · Cited by 26
Structural plasticity of the TDRD3 Tudor domain probed by a fragment screening hit
Liu, J., Zhang, S., Liu, M., Liu, Y., Nshogoza, G., Gao, J., Ma, R., Yang, Y., Wu, J., Zhang, J., et al. (2018) · FEBS Journal · doi:10.1111/febs.14469 · Cited by 26
Gsell, C., Richly, H., Coin, F., & Naegeli, H. (2019) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkz1229 · Cited by 26
“It has been proposed that methylated H3K79, located in the histone globular domain, is not accessible under unchallenged conditions but becomes exposed when the chromatin structure is altered for example after DNA damage induction (162).”
BackgroundMetabolic modulation of chromatin: implications for DNA repair and genomic integrity
Liu, J. (2013) · Frontiers in Genetics · doi:10.3389/fgene.2013.00182 · Cited by 26
“Similar to H4K20me2, H3K79me2 appears to be established prior to DNA damage rather than being induced by the DDR (Huyen et al., 2004), raising the intriguing question of how pre-existing, DNA damage-independent histone marks can elicit a DSB-specific damage response.”
BackgroundInfluentialSeparovich, R. J., & Wilkins, M. R. (2021) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.jbc.2021.100939 · Cited by 29
“The human ortholog of Rad9p, 53BP1, is similarly recruited to DSBs by H3K79 methylation (142).”
BackgroundDéry, U., & Masson, J. (2007) · DNA repair · doi:10.1016/j.dnarep.2006.12.009 · Cited by 27
TDRD6 mediates early steps of spliceosome maturation in primary spermatocytes
Akpınar, M., Lesche, M., Fanourgakis, G., Fu, J., Anastassiadis, K., Dahl, A., & Jessberger, R. (2017) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1006660 · Cited by 24
Inhibition of Serine Metabolism Promotes Resistance to Cisplatin in Gastric Cancer
Zhao, X., Fu, J., Tang, W., Yu, L., & Xu, W. (2020) · OncoTargets and Therapy · doi:10.2147/ott.s246430 · Cited by 25
The KH-Tudor Domain of A-Kinase Anchoring Protein 149 Mediates RNA-Dependent Self-Association
Rogne, M., Landsverk, H. B., Eynde, A. V., Beullens, M., Bollen, M., Collas, P., & Küntziger, T. M. (2006) · Biochemistry · doi:10.1021/bi061418y · Cited by 25
Goldstine, J. V., Nahas, S., Savill, K. M. Z., Gartler, S. M., Hansen, R. S., Roelfsema, J. H., Gatti, R. A., & Marahrens, Y. (2006) · DNA repair · doi:10.1016/j.dnarep.2005.12.002 · Cited by 24
Association of H3K79 monomethylation (an epigenetic signature) with arsenic-induced skin lesions
Bhattacharjee, P., Paul, S., Bhattacharjee, S., Giri, A. K., & Bhattacharjee, P. (2017) · Mutation research. Fundamental and molecular mechanisms of mutagenesis · doi:10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2017.11.001 · Cited by 24
Shah, S., & Henriksen, M. A. (2011) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m111.284190 · Cited by 23
Pick, H. M., Kilic, S., & Fierz, B. (2014) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Gene Regulatory Mechanisms · doi:10.1016/j.bbagrm.2014.04.016 · Cited by 22
Beck, C., Castañeda‐Zegarra, S., Huse, C., Xing, M., & Oksenych, V. (2019) · Biomolecules · doi:10.3390/biom10010060 · Cited by 23
“In particular, histone H4 lysine 20 di-methylation (H4K20me2) [3] and histone H3 lysine 79 mono- and di-methylation (H3K79me1/2) [4] were thought to facilitate recruitment of 53BP1 to the sites of damaged DNA.”
BackgroundClothianidin induces DNA damage and oxidative stress in bronchial epithelial cells
Şekeroğlu, Z. A., Şekeroğlu, V., Aydın, B., Yedier, S. K., & İlkun, E. (2020) · Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis · doi:10.1002/em.22376 · Cited by 23
“53BP1, a DNA damage sensor protein, is recruited to sites of DSBs by binding to gH2AX (Huyen et al., 2004; Lassmann et al., 2010).”
BackgroundTroglitazone inhibits histone deacetylase activity in breast cancer cells
Davies, G. F., Ross, A. R. S., Arnason, T., Juurlink, B. H. J., & Harkness, T. A. A. (2009) · Cancer Letters · doi:10.1016/j.canlet.2009.07.011 · Cited by 23
Ohsawa, R., Seol, J.-H., & Tyler, J. K. (2013) · Frontiers in Genetics · doi:10.3389/fgene.2013.00136 · Cited by 23
Glover, L., & Horn, D. (2014) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gku900 · Cited by 23
“Post-damage exposure of constitutive chromatin modification has been proposed in DNA damage signalling (53), and we also suggest a role for cell-cycle-regulated exposure in the case of acetylated H4K4; this modification is specifically inaccessible to antibodies in fixed T.”
BackgroundMuraki, K., & Murnane, J. P. (2017) · Genes & Genetic Systems · doi:10.1266/ggs.17-00014 · Cited by 25
Protein domain microarrays as a platform to decipher signaling pathways and the histone code
Chen, J., Sagum, C. A., & Bedford, M. T. (2019) · Methods · doi:10.1016/j.ymeth.2019.08.007 · Cited by 24
Ser1778 of 53BP1 Plays a Role in DNA Double-strand Break Repairs
Lee, J.-H., Cheong, H.-M., Kang, M.-Y., Kim, S.-Y., & Kang, Y. (2009) · Korean Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology · doi:10.4196/kjpp.2009.13.5.343 · Cited by 24
Prominent role of histone lysine demethylases in cancer epigenetics and therapy
Janardhan, A., Kathera, C., Darsi, A., Ali, W., He, L., Yang, Y., Luo, L., & Guo, Z. (2018) · Oncotarget · doi:10.18632/oncotarget.24319 · Cited by 23
“H3K4, H3K36, and H3K79 are implicated in activation of transcription, whereas H3K9, H3K27 and H4K20 are connected to transcriptional repression.”
BackgroundInfluentialVilloria, M. T., Gutiérrez-Escribano, P., Alonso‐Rodríguez, E., Ramos, F., Merino, E., Campos, A., Montoya, A., Kramer, H., Aragón, L., & Clemente‐Blanco, A. (2019) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkz794 · Cited by 22
“It has been reported in both human and yeasts that Rad9 binds to a DNA damaged site throughout its TUDOR domain (55,59).”
DNA Damage Checkpoint, Damage Repair, and Genome Stability
Liu, W., Yu, S., Chen, G., & Li, Y. (2006) · Acta Genetica Sinica · doi:10.1016/s0379-4172(06)60064-4 · Cited by 22
Colocalization of Mec1 and Mrc1 is sufficient for Rad53 phosphorylation in vivo
Berens, T. J., & Toczyski, D. P. (2012) · Molecular Biology of the Cell · doi:10.1091/mbc.e11-10-0852 · Cited by 23
“Along with a constitutive methylation on H3K79, gamma-H2A promotes the recruitment of Rad9, the checkpoint mediator (Huyen et al. , 2004; Nakamura et al. , 2004; Giannattasio et al. , 2005).”
BackgroundSchibler, A., Koutelou, E., Tomida, J., Wilson, M. A., Wang, L., Lu, Y., Cabrera, A. P., Chosed, R. J., Li, W., Li, B., et al. (2016) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.278887.116 · Cited by 22
“A number of protein domains “read” the methylation state of H3K4, including PHDs, WD40 domains, and Tudor domains (Huyen et al. 2004; Wysocka et al. 2005; Kim et al. 2006; Shi et al. 2006).”
Schleker, T., Nagai, S., & Gasser, S. M. (2009) · DNA repair · doi:10.1016/j.dnarep.2009.04.010 · Cited by 21
Friedl, A. A., Mazurek, B., & Seiler, D. M. (2012) · Frontiers in Oncology · doi:10.3389/fonc.2012.00117 · Cited by 21
“Its application for the analysis of alterations in chromatin patterns at DSB sites requires site-specific induction of DSBs (e.g., Murr et al., 2006; O’Hagan et al., 2008; Stante et al., 2009; Iacovoni et al., 2010).”
BackgroundInfluentialWu, F., Chen, Y., Li, G., Zhu, D., Wang, L., & Wang, J. (2019) · Artificial Cells Nanomedicine and Biotechnology · doi:10.1080/21691401.2019.1642905 · Cited by 21
“DNA to renovate signaling molecules [46].”
le Maire, A., Schiltz, M., Stura, E. A., Pinon‐Lataillade, G., Couprie, J., Moutiez, M., Gondry, M., Angulo, J. F., & Zinn‐Justin, S. (2006) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2006.09.033 · Cited by 21
Werner, M., Trauner, M., Schauer, T., Ummethum, H., Márquez-Gómez, E., Lalonde, M., Lee, C. S. K., Tsirkas, I., Sajid, A., Murriello, A. C., et al. (2025) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkaf109 · Cited by 20
“Additionally, H3K79me2 / 3 has been linked to DNA damage response, as the 53BP1 Tudor domain binds H3K79me3 [ 92 ], which is crucial for responding to double-strand DNA breaks.”
Zhang, Z., Xing, X., Jiang, S., Qiu, C., Mo, Z., Chen, S., Chen, L., Wang, Q., Xiao, Y., Dong, G., et al. (2020) · Environmental Pollution · doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2020.115956 · Cited by 20
Mao, Y., Sun, Y., Wu, Z., Zheng, J., Zhang, J., Zeng, J., Lee, C., & Kim, J. K. (2021) · Cell Death and Disease · doi:10.1038/s41419-021-04431-y · Cited by 20
“As DOT1L is known to be required for proper DNA damage response and repair [18, 19, 27], we examined if inhibition of DOT1L can sensitize RB cells to genotoxic drugs.”
BackgroundWang, L., Dai, W. H., & Lu, L. (2014) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m114.597161 · Cited by 20
Tudor domains track down DNA breaks
Stucki, M., & Jackson, S. P. (2004) · Nature Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/ncb1204-1150 · Cited by 20
“So how then is 53BP1 recruited to sites of DSBs? An answer has been provided in a recent paper in Nature from Thanos Halazonetis and colleague”
BackgroundChoreographing the Double Strand Break Response: Ubiquitin and SUMO Control of Nuclear Architecture
Harding, S. M., & Greenberg, R. A. (2016) · Frontiers in Genetics · doi:10.3389/fgene.2016.00103 · Cited by 19
Nucleosome Remodeling by Fun30SMARCAD1 in the DNA Damage Response
Bantele, S. C. S., & Pfander, B. (2019) · Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences · doi:10.3389/fmolb.2019.00078 · Cited by 22
“Notably, both Rad9 and 53BP1, as well as fission yeast Crb2 are nucleosome binders and appear to recognize several (modified) histones, suggesting multivalency (Huyen et al., 2004; Nakamura et al., 2004; Sanders et al., 2004; Wysocki et al., 2005; Botuyan et al., 2006; Toh et al., 2006; Grenon et al., 2007; Hammet et…”
BackgroundNovel therapeutic strategies for MLL-rearranged leukemias
Wong, N.-H. M., & So, C. W. E. (2020) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Gene Regulatory Mechanisms · doi:10.1016/j.bbagrm.2020.194584 · Cited by 20
Modular paths to ‘decoding’ and ‘wiping’ histone lysine methylation
Kustatscher, G., & Ladurner, A. G. (2007) · Current Opinion in Chemical Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cbpa.2007.09.011 · Cited by 20
Histone modifications as regulators of life and death in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Fahrenkrog, B. (2015) · Microbial Cell · doi:10.15698/mic2016.01.472 · Cited by 21
Kyriss, M., Jin, Y., Gallegos, I. J., Sanford, J. A., & Wyrick, J. J. (2010) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.00290-10 · Cited by 20
“Methylation of H3 K79 by Dot1 is implicated in the DNA damage response (18, 52) and regulates silencing in Saccharomyces cerevisiae (33, 34, 49).”
BackgroundStructure and Function of Protein Modules in Chromatin Biology
Yap, K. L., & Zhou, M. (2006) · Results and problems in cell differentiation · doi:10.1007/400_010 · Cited by 20
Checkpoint and Coordinated Cellular Responses to DNA Damage
Yang, X. H., & Zou, L. (2006) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/b136684 · Cited by 20
DOT1L-mediated RAP80 methylation promotes BRCA1 recruitment to elicit DNA repair
Tang, H., Lu, Y.-F., Zeng, R., Liu, C., Shu, Y., Wu, Y., Su, J., Di, L., Qian, J., Zhang, J., et al. (2024) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2320804121 · Cited by 21
“It has been previously reported that 53BP1 recruitment to DSBs depends on H4K20me2 in HeLa cells ( 37 ) or H3K79me2 in U2OS cells ( 34 , 41 ).”
InfluentialA Modified Epigenetics Toolbox to Study Histone Modifications on the Nucleosome Core
Frederiks, F., Stulemeijer, I. J. E., Ovaa, H., & van Leeuwen, F. (2010) · ChemBioChem · doi:10.1002/cbic.201000617 · Cited by 19
McVean, A., Kent, S., Bakanov, A. V., Hobbs, T., & Anderson, R. M. (2012) · Genome Integrity · doi:10.1186/2041-9414-3-1 · Cited by 19
“For example, 53BP1 has been shown to localise to sites of DSB [7-9] and studies have implicated the localisation and retention of 53BP1 to be g -H2AX dependant [10], Mdc1 dependant [11-13] and as a function of chromatin accessibility [14].”
BackgroundHistone lysine modifying enzymes and their critical roles in DNA double-strand break repair
Zhang, J., Lu, X., MoghaddamKohi, S., Shi, L., Xu, X., & Zhu, W. (2021) · DNA repair · doi:10.1016/j.dnarep.2021.103206 · Cited by 18
Ubiquitin-H2AX fusions render 53BP1 recruitment to DNA damage sites independent of RNF8 or RNF168
Kocylowski, M. K., Rey, A. J., Stewart, G. S., & Halazonetis, T. D. (2015) · Cell Cycle · doi:10.1080/15384101.2015.1010918 · Cited by 18
“Plasmids encoding RNF8, and RNF168 polypeptides fused to the C-terminus of GFP were generated from a previously-described mammalian expression plasmid.(18) For lentiviral transduction of RIDDLE cells the coding sequences were subcloned into the pRDI292CMV vector.”
BackgroundMethodSelf-citationAndreadis, C., Nikolaou, C., Fragiadakis, G. S., Tsiliki, G., & Alexandraki, D. (2014) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gku915 · Cited by 18
“Similar to the mammalian p53BP1, Rad9 protein contains a conserved Tudor domain that recognizes H3K79 methylated histones after double-strand break (DSB) formation (8).”
BackgroundTails of histones in DNA double-strand break repair
Bilsland, E., & Downs, J. A. (2005) · Mutagenesis · doi:10.1093/mutage/gei031 · Cited by 19
“Although not on the histone tail, methylation of histone H3 at lysine 79 has recently been implicated in DNA damage responses (72).”
InfluentialRyu, J. S., Kang, S., & Koo, H. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0064028 · Cited by 18
“The regions controlling nuclear focus formation (Foci) and the Tudor domains are also conserved [22,34].”
BackgroundA cell cycle-independent mode of the Rad9-Dpb11 interaction is induced by DNA damage
di Cicco, G., Bantele, S. C. S., Reußwig, K.-U., & Pfander, B. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-017-11937-z · Cited by 18
Evans, M. L., Bostelman, L. J., Albrecht, A. M., Keller, A. M., Strande, N. T., & Thompson, J. S. (2008) · Current Genetics · doi:10.1007/s00294-008-0182-1 · Cited by 18
“K79 methylation is not altered in response to double stranded breaks, but it has been suggested that changes in chromatin structure caused by breaks might expose constitutive K79 methylation, enabling Rad9/53BP1 to bind to chromatin in order to initiate damage responses ( Huyen et al. 2004 ).”
BackgroundInfluentialTudor hooks up with DNA repair
Corsini, L., & Sattler, M. (2007) · Nature Structural & Molecular Biology · doi:10.1038/nsmb0207-98 · Cited by 18
Chromatin organization modulates the origin of heritable structural variations in human genome
Roychowdhury, T., & Abyzov, A. S. (2019) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkz103 · Cited by 16
“Thus, we concluded that NAHR around spontaneous DSBs likely arise as errors of HDR. Association of NAHR breakpoints with H3K79me2 (Supplementary Figure S7), might point toward regional bias for 53BP1 promoted error-free HDR.”
BackgroundInfluentialSystematic analysis of histone modification readout
Nikolov, M., & Fischle, W. (2012) · Molecular BioSystems · doi:10.1039/c2mb25328c · Cited by 17
PARP1 is required for preserving telomeric integrity but is dispensable for A-NHEJ
Harvey, A., Mielke, N., Grimstead, J. W., Jones, R. E., Nguyen, T., Mueller, M. R., Baird, D. M., & Hendrickson, E. A. (2018) · Oncotarget · doi:10.18632/oncotarget.26201 · Cited by 18
“We performed this assay in the various cell lines for both telomeric DNA and 53BP1, a common marker of DNA DSBs [59, 60].”
MethodDanovski, G., Dyankova-Danovska, T., Stamatov, R., Aleksandrov, R., Kanev, P.-B., & Stoynov, S. (2023) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms242316784 · Cited by 18
Nunes, V. S., Moretti, N. S., da Silva, M. S., Elias, M. C., Janzen, C. J., & Schenkman, S. (2020) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Cell Research · doi:10.1016/j.bbamcr.2020.118694 · Cited by 16
Belmans, N., Gilles, L., Welkenhuysen, J., Vermeesen, R., Baselet, B., Salmon, B. J. R., Baatout, S., Jacobs, R., Lucas, S., Lambrichts, I., et al. (2021) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2021.584484 · Cited by 16
“53BP1 is a known DNA DSB sensor and a mediator and effector in the DDR to DSBs (24, 30, 31).”
BackgroundChromatin Ubiquitination Guides DNA Double Strand Break Signaling and Repair
Kolobynina, K. G., Rapp, A. W., & Cardoso, M. C. (2022) · Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology · doi:10.3389/fcell.2022.928113 · Cited by 17
Genome maintenance in the context of 4D chromatin condensation
Yu, S., Yang, F., & Shen, W. H. (2016) · Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences · doi:10.1007/s00018-016-2221-2 · Cited by 17
“Essentially, repair mechanisms loosen the nucleosome for accessibility of histones and repair factors [124, 125].”
Láscarez-Lagunas, L. I., Herruzo, E., Grishok, A., San-Segundo, P. A., & Colaiácovo, M. P. (2020) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1009171 · Cited by 16
“, H3K79me, H4K20me) supporting the recruitment of DNA damage checkpoint adaptors to activate the checkpoint [72,73].”
BackgroundRossodivita, A. A., Boudoures, A. L., Mecoli, J. P., Steenkiste, E. M., Karl, A. L., Vines, E. M., Cole, A. M., Ansbro, M. R., & Thompson, J. S. (2014) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gku242 · Cited by 18
“While some evidence has been published implicating this modification as a binding site for DNA repair factors (17), it is not yet clear if this modification is a docking site for repair machinery, a regulator of repair gene transcription, a modulator of repair-specific chromatin structures, or another function that ha…”
BackgroundCasari, E., Gobbini, E., Gnugnoli, M., Mangiagalli, M., Clerici, M., & Longhese, M. P. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-25090-9 · Cited by 19
Stavridi, E. S., & Halazonetis, T. D. (2005) · Nature Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/ncb0705-648 · Cited by 16
Self-citationHistone H2B Ubiquitylation and Deubiquitylation in Genomic RegulationPreprint
Emre, N. C. T., & Berger, S. L. (2004) · Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology · doi:10.1101/sqb.2004.69.289 · Cited by 16
Zhou, Y., & Shao, C. (2020) · Mutation Research/Reviews in Mutation Research · doi:10.1016/j.mrrev.2020.108362 · Cited by 14
An emerging maestro of immune regulation: how DOT1L orchestrates the harmonies of the immune system
Kealy, L. C., Runting, J., Thiele, D., & Scheer, S. (2024) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2024.1385319 · Cited by 15
“53BP1, a crucial component of double-strand DNA damage repair, requires DOT1L mediated H3K79 methylation for recruitment to damaged DNA (72).”
BackgroundInfluentialWu, G., Wang, N., Luo, Y., Zhang, Y., Wang, P., Zhu, Z., Gao, Y., Zhi, D., & Yang, B. (2017) · Tumor Biology · doi:10.1177/1010428317699117 · Cited by 17
Pan, X., Fang, Y., Xue-ming, Y., Zheng, D., Chen, L., Wang, L., Xiao, J., Wang, X., Wang, K., Cheng, Z., et al. (2017) · BMC Genomics · doi:10.1186/s12864-017-4172-x · Cited by 14
“The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. acetylation at H3K9 and H3K56 [12] and methylation at H3K79 [13] and H4K20 [14].”
BackgroundInfluentialAlpha‐Bazin, B., Lorphelin, A., Nozerand, N., Charier, G., Marchetti, C., Bérenguer, F., Couprie, J., Gilquin, B., Zinn‐Justin, S., & Quéméneur, É. (2005) · Protein Science · doi:10.1110/ps.041305205 · Cited by 15
“Previously described as displaying chromatin-binding activity in vivo, the m53BP1 tandem-Tudor domain was found to bind methylated histone H3 (Huyen et al. 2004).”
BackgroundInfluentialGermline alterations in the 53BP1 gene in breast and ovarian cancer families
Rapakko, K., Heikkinen, K., Karppinen, S., Erkko, H., & Winqvist, R. (2006) · Cancer Letters · doi:10.1016/j.canlet.2006.01.021 · Cited by 15
Computational strategies to address chromatin structure problems
Perišić, O., & Tamar Schlick, A. (2016) · Physical Biology · doi:10.1088/1478-3975/13/3/035006 · Cited by 15
Tudor Domains as Methyl-Lysine and Methyl-Arginine Readers
Botuyan, M. V., & Mer, G. (2016) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-802389-1.00008-3 · Cited by 18
Histone Acetylation And Methylation
An, W. (2007) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/1-4020-5466-1_16 · Cited by 15
“DOT1-mediated methylation of H3-K79 has also been identified as an interaction signal for tandem tudor domain of DSB check point protein 53BP1, and this interaction mediates the 53BP1 targeting to sites of DNA DSBs ( Huyen et al., 2004 ).”
BackgroundDissection of Rad9 BRCT domain function in the mitotic checkpoint response to telomere uncapping
Nnakwe, C. C., Altaf, M., Côté, J., & Kron, S. J. (2009) · DNA repair · doi:10.1016/j.dnarep.2009.09.010 · Cited by 15
Gu, X., Hua, Y., Yu, J., Yang, L., Ge, S., Jia, R., Chai, P., Zhuang, A., & Fan, X. (2022) · Journal of Pharmaceutical Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.jpha.2022.11.008 · Cited by 13
Garlic‐derived compounds: Epigenetic modulators and their antitumor effects
Zhang, H., Wang, H., Qin, L., & Lin, S. (2024) · Phytotherapy Research · doi:10.1002/ptr.8108 · Cited by 14
“Histone methylation also showed an important role in the establishment of checklist control in the process of DNA damage repair (Huyen et al., 2004).”
BackgroundMulti-layered chromatin proteomics identifies cell vulnerabilities in DNA repair
Sigismondo, G., Arseni, L., Palacio‐Escat, N., Hofmann, T. G., Seiffert, M., & Krijgsveld, J. (2022) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkac1264 · Cited by 14
“For instance, H3K79 acts as one of the docking sites for 53BP1 recruitment (79); however, its methylation level has been reported to be unchanged or to decrease upon DSB (16,92).”
BackgroundIonizing radiation-induced foci persistence screen to discover enhancers of accelerated senescence
Kron, S. J., Labay, Efimova, I. V., Quarshie, Golden, & Weichselbaum (2011) · International Journal of High Throughput Screening · doi:10.2147/ijhts.s17076 · Cited by 14
Enhanced Protein Detection Using a Trapping Mode on a Hybrid Quadrupole Linear Ion Trap (Q-Trap)
Drogaris, P., Blanc, J. C. Y. L., Fitzgerald, J., Lowndes, N. F., Verreault, A., & Thibault, P. (2009) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac9004259 · Cited by 14
TP53 and its Regulatory Genes as Prognosis of Cutaneous Melanoma
Khan, S. U., Ullah, Z., Shaukat, H., Unab, S., Jannat, S., Ali, W., Ali, A., Irfan, M., Khan, M. F., & Cervantes‐Villagrana, R. D. (2023) · Cancer Informatics · doi:10.1177/11769351231177267 · Cited by 13
GSE1 links the HDAC1/CoREST co-repressor complex to DNA damage
Vcelkova, T., Reiter, W., Zylka, M., Hollenstein, D. M., Schuckert, S., Hartl, M., & Seiser, C. (2023) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkad911 · Cited by 12
“monoubiquitination levels in response to DNA -damage (6-10).”
BackgroundHuang, Y., Tang, M., Hu, Z., Cai, B., Chen, G., Jiang, L., Xia, Y., Guan, P., Li, X., Mao, Z., et al. (2024) · Oncogenesis · doi:10.1038/s41389-023-00503-0 · Cited by 15
DOT1L Mediates Stem Cell Maintenance and Represents a Therapeutic Vulnerability in Cancer
Kurani, H., & Slingerland, J. M. (2024) · Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-24-3304 · Cited by 14
“DOT1L-mediated H3K79me2 recruits the 53BP1 protein in humans (81) and its ortholog Rad9 in yeast (53) to DNA DSBs, thus linking this mark with DNA repair.”
Lavelle, C., & Benecke, A. (2006) · The European Physical Journal E · doi:10.1140/epje/i2005-10059-9 · Cited by 13
A multifaceted role for MOF histone modifying factor in genome maintenance
Mujoo, K., Hunt, C. R., Horikoshi, N., & Pandita, T. K. (2016) · Mechanisms of Ageing and Development · doi:10.1016/j.mad.2016.03.012 · Cited by 13
Opportunities for translation: Targeting DNA repair pathways in pancreatic cancer
Maginn, E. N., de Sousa, C. H., Wasan, H. S., & Stronach, E. A. (2014) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Reviews on Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.bbcan.2014.04.002 · Cited by 14
Metadata
- Authors
- Huyen, Y., Zgheib, O., DiTullio Jr, R. A., Gorgoulis, V. G., Zacharatos, P., Petty, T. J., Sheston, E. A., Mellert, H. S., Stavridi, E. S., & Halazonetis, T. D.
- Affiliations
- The Wistar Institute (US)
- Corresponding author
- Halazonetis, Thanos D.
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2004-11
- Volume
- 432
- Issue
- 7015
- Pages
- 406-411
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- OpenAlex
- W2038451572
- Cited by
- 884
- References
- 30
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 37 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 37 · 2015: 44 · 2014: 34 · 2013: 51 · 2012: 57
- FWCI
- 22.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Nature (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- University of Pennsylvania
- National Cancer Institute
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
- Keywords
- 53BP1, histone H3 lysine 79 methylation, DNA double-strand breaks, DNA damage checkpoint, Tudor domain, DOT1L, chromatin structure, DNA damage recognition, Rad9, protein-DNA interactions
- MeSH terms
- Tumor Suppressor p53-Binding Protein 1, Amino Acid Sequence, Binding Sites, Chromatin, Cross-Linking Reagents, DNA, DNA Damage, Histones, Humans, Lysine, Methylation, Methyltransferases, Models, Molecular, Molecular Sequence Data, Phosphoproteins, Protein Binding, Histone-Lysine N-Methyltransferase, Conserved Sequence, Protein Structure, Tertiary, Cell Line, Tumor, Intracellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review