The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Verification of the Crooks fluctuation theorem and recovery of RNA folding free energies
Open accessAbstract
Atomic force microscopes and optical tweezers are widely used to probe the mechanical properties of individual molecules and molecular interactions, by exerting mechanical forces that induce transitions such as unfolding or dissociation. These transitions often occur under nonequilibrium conditions and are associated with hysteresis effects—features usually taken to preclude the extraction of equilibrium information from the experimental data. But fluctuation theorems allow us to relate the work along nonequilibrium trajectories to thermodynamic free-energy differences. They have been shown to be applicable to single-molecule force measurements and have already provided information on the folding free energy of a RNA hairpin. Here we show that the Crooks fluctuation theorem can be used to determine folding free energies for folding and unfolding processes occurring in weak as well as strong nonequilibrium regimes, thereby providing a test of its validity under such conditions. We use optical tweezers to measure repeatedly the mechanical work associated with the unfolding and refolding of a small RNA hairpin and an RNA three-helix junction. The resultant work distributions are then analysed according to the theorem and allow us to determine the difference in folding free energy between an RNA molecule and a mutant differing only by one base pair, and the thermodynamic stabilizing effect of magnesium ions on the RNA structure.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mfold web server for nucleic acid folding and hybridization prediction
Zuker, M. (2003) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkg595 · Cited by 13,404
Nonequilibrium Equality for Free Energy Differences
Jarzynski, C. (1997) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.78.2690 · Cited by 5,293
Self-citationEfficient estimation of free energy differences from Monte Carlo data
Bennett, C. H. (1976) · Journal of Computational Physics · doi:10.1016/0021-9991(76)90078-4 · Cited by 2,755
Crooks, G. E. (1999) · Physical Review E · doi:10.1103/physreve.60.2721 · Cited by 2,607
Oligoribonucleotide synthesis using T7 RNA polymerase and synthetic DNA templates
Milligan, J. F., Groebe, D. R., Witherell, G. W., & Uhlenbeck, O. C. (1987) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/15.21.8783 · Cited by 2,136
Dynamical Ensembles in Nonequilibrium Statistical Mechanics
Gallavotti, G., & Cohen, E. G. D. (1995) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.74.2694 · Cited by 1,703
Probability of second law violations in shearing steady states
Evans, D. J., Cohen, E. G. D., & Morriss, G. P. (1993) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.71.2401 · Cited by 1,686
The Thermodynamics of DNA Structural Motifs
SantaLucia, J., & Hicks, D. (2004) · Annual Review of Biophysics and Biomolecular Structure · doi:10.1146/annurev.biophys.32.110601.141800 · Cited by 1,314
Liphardt, J., Dumont, S., Smith, S. B., Tinoco, I., & Bustamante, C. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1071152 · Cited by 1,243
Self-citationStructure of yeast phenylalanine tRNA at 3 Å resolution
Robertus, J. D., Ladner, J. E., Finch, J. T., Rhodes, D., Brown, R. S., Clark, B. F. C., & Klug, A. (1974) · Nature · doi:10.1038/250546a0 · Cited by 1,032
Cited by
Stochastic thermodynamics, fluctuation theorems and molecular machines
Seifert, U. (2012) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/0034-4885/75/12/126001 · Cited by 3,300
Recent Advances in Optical Tweezers
Moffitt, J. R., Chemla, Y. R., Smith, S. B., & Bustamante, C. (2008) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev.biochem.77.043007.090225 · Cited by 1,084
Self-citationDescription of quantum coherence in thermodynamic processes requires constraints beyond free energy
Lostaglio, M., Jennings, D., & Rudolph, T. (2015) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms7383 · Cited by 727
Generalized Jarzynski Equality under Nonequilibrium Feedback Control
Sagawa, T., & Ueda, M. (2010) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.104.090602 · Cited by 513
Differential detection of dual traps improves the spatial resolution of optical tweezers
Moffitt, J. R., Chemla, Y. R., Izhaky, D., & Bustamante, C. (2006) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0603342103 · Cited by 284
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Collin, D., Ritort, F., Jarzynski, C., Smith, S. B., Tinoco, I., & Bustamante, C.
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2005-09
- Volume
- 437
- Issue
- 7056
- Pages
- 231-234
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- OpenAlex
- W1975830725
- Cited by
- 1,049
- References
- 30
- FWCI
- 35.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Verification of the Crooks fluctuation theorem and recovery of RNA folding free energies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/nature04061
- The paper
- Collin, D., Ritort, F., Jarzynski, C., Smith, S. B., Tinoco, I., & Bustamante, C. (2005). Verification of the Crooks fluctuation theorem and recovery of RNA folding free energies. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04061
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.