Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 930

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Dissociable neural mechanisms supporting visual short-term memory for objects

Xu, Yaoda, Chun, Marvin M.·2006·Nature
DOI 10.1038/nature04262
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nature04262

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 24

  1. Phillips, W. A. On the distinction between sensory storage and short-term visual memory. Percept. Psychophys. 16, 283–290 (1974) · DOI
  2. Pashler, H. Familiarity and visual change detection. Percept. Psychophys. 44, 369–378 (1988) · DOI
  3. Luck, S. J. & Vogel, E. K. The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions. Nature 390, 279–281 (1997) · DOI
  4. Xu, Y. Encoding colour and shape from different parts of an object in visual short-term memory. Percept. Psychophys. 64, 1260–1280 (2002) · DOI
  5. Alvarez, G. A. & Cavanagh, P. The capacity of visual short-term memory is set both by visual information load and by number of objects. Psychol. Sci. 15, 106–111 (2004) · DOI · Paper page
  6. Fuster, J. M. & Jervey, J. P. Neuronal firing in the inferotemporal cortex of the monkey in a visual memory task. J. Neurosci. 2, 361–375 (1982) · DOI · Paper page
  7. Goldman-Rakic, P. S. in Handbook of Physiology: The Nervous System, Higher Functions of the Brain (eds Mountcastle, V. B., Plum, F. & Geiger, S. R.) 373–417 (American Physiological Society, Bethesda, Maryland, 1987)
  8. Miller, E. K., Erickson, C. A. & Desimone, R. Neural mechanisms of visual working memory in prefrontal cortex of the macaque. J. Neurosci. 16, 5154–5167 (1996) · DOI · Paper page
  9. Courtney, S. M., Ungerleider, L. G., Keil, K. & Haxby, J. V. Transient and sustained activity in a distributed neural system for human working memory. Nature 386, 608–611 (1997) · DOI · Paper page
  10. Smith, E. E. & Jonides, J. Neuroimaging analyses of human working memory. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 95, 12061–12068 (1998) · DOI · Paper page
  11. Pessoa, L., Gutierrez, E., Bandettini, P. A. & Ungerleider, L. G. Neural correlates of visual working memory: fMRI amplitude predicts task performance. Neuron 35, 975–987 (2002) · DOI
  12. Curtis, C. E. & D'Esposito, M. Persistent activity in the prefrontal cortex during working memory. Trends Cogn. Sci. 9, 415–423 (2003) · DOI · Paper page
  13. Jonides, J., Lacey, S. C. & Nee, D. E. Processes of working memory in mind and brain. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 14, 2–5 (2005) · DOI · Paper page
  14. Pasternak, T. & Greenlee, M. W. Working memory in primate sensory systems. Nature Rev. Neurosci. 6, 97–107 (2005) · DOI · Paper page
  15. Todd, J. J. & Marois, R. Capacity limit of visual short-term memory in human posterior parietal cortex. Nature 428, 751–754 (2004) · DOI · Paper page
  16. Todd, J. J. & Marois, R. Posterior parietal cortex activity predicts individual differences in visual short-term memory capacity. Cogn. Affect Behav. Neurosci. 6, 144–155 (2005) · DOI
  17. Vogel, E. K. & Machizawa, M. G. Neural activity predicts individual differences in visual working memory capacity. Nature 428, 748–751 (2004) · DOI
  18. Malach, R. et al. Object-related activity revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging in human occipital cortex. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 92, 8135–8139 (1995) · DOI · Paper page
  19. Grill-Spector, K., Kushnir, T., Edelman, S., Itzchak, Y. & Malach, R. Cue-invariant activation in object-related areas of the human occipital lobe. Neuron 21, 191–202 (1998) · DOI
  20. Kourtzi, Z. & Kanwisher, N. Cortical regions involved in perceiving object shape. J. Neurosci. 20, 3310–3318 (2000) · DOI · Paper page
  21. Grill-Spector, K., Kushnir, T., Hendler, T. & Malach, R. The dynamics of object-selective activation correlate with recognition performance in human. Nature Neurosci. 3, 837–843 (2000) · DOI · Paper page
  22. Talairach, J. & Tournoux, P. Co-Planar Stereoaxis Atlas of the Human Brain (transl. Rayport, M) (Thieme Medical, New York, 1988)
  23. Kanwisher, N. & Wojciulik, E. Visual attention: insights from brain imaging. Nature Rev. Neurosci. 1, 91–100 (2000) · DOI
  24. Culham, J. C. et al. Attention response functions: Characterizing brain areas using fMRI activation during parametric variations of attentional load. Neuron 32, 737–745 (2001) · DOI

Cited by

See all 930

Metadata

Authors
Xu, Y., & Chun, M. M.
Venue
Nature
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2005-12-28
Volume
440
Issue
7080
Pages
91-95
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
DOI
10.1038/nature04262
OpenAlex
W2068805221
Cited by
930
References
6
FWCI
13.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.