Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,069

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Mutational evolution in a lobular breast tumour profiled at single nucleotide resolution

Open access
Shah, Sohrab P., Morin, Ryan D., Khattra, Jaswinder, Prentice, Leah, Pugh, Trevor, Burleigh, Angela, Delaney, Allen, Gelmon, Karen, Guliany, Ryan, Senz, Janine, Steidl, Christian, Holt, Robert A., Jones, Steven, Sun, Mark, Leung, Gillian, Moore, Richard, Severson, Tesa, Taylor, Greg A., Teschendorff, Andrew E., Tse, Kane, Turashvili, Gulisa, Varhol, Richard, Warren, René L., Watson, Peter, Zhao, Yongjun, Caldas, Carlos, Huntsman, David, Hirst, Martin, Marra, Marco A., Aparicio, Samuel·2009·Nature

Abstract

Next-generation sequencing approaches have been used to investigate the genomes and transcriptomes of an oestrogen-receptor-α-positive metastatic lobular breast cancer from a patient — rather than from a cell line or xenograft — over a 9-year period between the diagnosis of the primary tumour and the appearance of metastasis. Comparison of the somatic non-synonymous coding mutations in the metastasis and the primary tumour of the same patient and the combined analysis of genome and transcriptome data provided insights into the mutational evolution that can occur with disease progression. The cover shows sequence elements of the HAUS3 locus, one of the genes found to be mutated in the tissue (shown in the background) from the primary lobular cancer used for this work. Advances in next generation sequencing have made it possible to precisely characterize the coding mutations that occur during the development and progression of individual cancers. Here, this technique is used to sequence the genomes and transcriptomes of an oestrogen-receptor-α-positive metastatic lobular breast cancer; significant evolution is found to occur with disease progression. Recent advances in next generation sequencing1,2,3,4 have made it possible to precisely characterize all somatic coding mutations that occur during the development and progression of individual cancers. Here we used these approaches to sequence the genomes (>43-fold coverage) and transcriptomes of an oestrogen-receptor-α-positive metastatic lobular breast cancer at depth. We found 32 somatic non-synonymous coding mutations present in the metastasis, and measured the frequency of these somatic mutations in DNA from the primary tumour of the same patient, which arose 9 years earlier. Five of the 32 mutations (in ABCB11, HAUS3, SLC24A4, SNX4 and PALB2) were prevalent in the DNA of the primary tumour removed at diagnosis 9 years earlier, six (in KIF1C, USP28, MYH8, MORC1, KIAA1468 and RNASEH2A) were present at lower frequencies (1–13%), 19 were not detected in the primary tumour, and two were undetermined. The combined analysis of genome and transcriptome data revealed two new RNA-editing events that recode the amino acid sequence of SRP9 and COG3. Taken together, our data show that single nucleotide mutational heterogeneity can be a property of low or intermediate grade primary breast cancers and that significant evolution can occur with disease progression.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nature08489

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 1,069

Metadata

Authors
Shah, S. P., Morin, R. D., Khattra, J., Prentice, L., Pugh, T., Burleigh, A., Delaney, A., Gelmon, K., Guliany, R., Senz, J., Steidl, C., Holt, R. A., Jones, S., Sun, M., Leung, G., Moore, R., Severson, T., Taylor, G. A., Teschendorff, A. E., Tse, K., Turashvili, G., Varhol, R., Warren, R. L., Watson, P., Zhao, Y., Caldas, C., Huntsman, D., Hirst, M., Marra, M. A., & Aparicio, S.
Venue
Nature
Published
2009-10
Volume
461
Issue
7265
Pages
809-813
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2004834404
Cited by
1,069
References
4
FWCI
36.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.