Cited by 927Distributed Control Multi-Agent SystemsEvacuation and Crowd DynamicsAnimal Behavior and Reproduction

Inferring the structure and dynamics of interactions in schooling fish

Open access
Katz, Yael, Tunstrøm, Kolbjørn, Ioannou, Christos C., Huepe, Cristián, Couzin, Iain D.·2011·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Determining individual-level interactions that govern highly coordinated motion in animal groups or cellular aggregates has been a long-standing challenge, central to understanding the mechanisms and evolution of collective behavior. Numerous models have been proposed, many of which display realistic-looking dynamics, but nonetheless rely on untested assumptions about how individuals integrate information to guide movement. Here we infer behavioral rules directly from experimental data. We begin by analyzing trajectories of golden shiners (Notemigonus crysoleucas) swimming in two-fish and three-fish shoals to map the mean effective forces as a function of fish positions and velocities. Speeding and turning responses are dynamically modulated and clearly delineated. Speed regulation is a dominant component of how fish interact, and changes in speed are transmitted to those both behind and ahead. Alignment emerges from attraction and repulsion, and fish tend to copy directional changes made by those ahead. We find no evidence for explicit matching of body orientation. By comparing data from two-fish and three-fish shoals, we challenge the standard assumption, ubiquitous in physics-inspired models of collective behavior, that individual motion results from averaging responses to each neighbor considered separately; three-body interactions make a substantial contribution to fish dynamics. However, pairwise interactions qualitatively capture the correct spatial interaction structure in small groups, and this structure persists in larger groups of 10 and 30 fish. The interactions revealed here may help account for the rapid changes in speed and direction that enable real animal groups to stay cohesive and amplify important social information.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1107583108

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Machine learning-derived knowledge can be used to infer individual decision rules in collective motion and to compute activity budgets for individuals without continuous human observation or time-consuming video analysis.

    “This knowledge can then be used to infer individual decision rules in collective motion (Katz, Tunstrom, Ioannou, Huepe, & Couzin, 2011;Nagy, Kos, Biro, & Vicsek, 2010) and to compute activity budgets for individuals without the need for continuous human observation or time-consuming video analysis.”

    From Applications of machine learning in animal behaviour studies (2017) · cites this paper as Katz et al., 2011

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Katz, Y., Tunstrøm, K., Ioannou, C. C., Huepe, C., & Couzin, I. D.
Affiliations
  • Princeton University (US)
  • 614 North Paulina Street, Chicago, IL 60622
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2011-07-27
Volume
108
Issue
46
Pages
18720-18725
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2002266200
Cited by
927
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 50 · 2025: 69 · 2024: 76 · 2023: 80 · 2022: 72 · 2021: 73 · 2020: 76 · 2019: 58 · 2018: 69 · 2017: 57 · 2016: 53 · 2015: 54 · 2014: 46 · 2013: 46 · 2012: 40
FWCI
58.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (publishedVersion)
  • KOPS (University of Konstanz) (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (0848755, 0905970, N00014-09-1-1074)
  • Princeton University
  • Norges Forskningsråd
  • Advanced Research Projects Agency
  • Office of Naval Research (N00014-09-1-1074, N00014)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Distributed Control Multi-Agent Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Ocean Engineering › Evacuation and Crowd Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
Keywords
fish schooling, collective behavior, golden shiner, Notemigonus crysoleucas, fish shoals, effective force, speed regulation, alignment, attraction and repulsion, three-body interactions, pairwise interactions, trajectory analysis, social information, group cohesion
MeSH terms
Animals, Behavior, Animal, Cyprinidae, Fishes, Models, Biological, Movement, Social Behavior, Software, Swimming, Time Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review