The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Cis-interactions between Notch and Delta generate mutually exclusive signalling states
Open accessAbstract
The Notch–Delta signalling pathway allows communication between neighbouring cells during development. It has a critical role in the formation of ‘fine-grained’ patterns, generating distinct cell fates among groups of initially equivalent neighbouring cells and sharply delineating neighbouring regions in developing tissues. The Delta ligand has been shown to have two activities: it transactivates Notch in neighbouring cells and cis-inhibits Notch in its own cell. However, it remains unclear how Notch integrates these two activities and how the resulting system facilitates pattern formation. Here we report the development of a quantitative time-lapse microscopy platform for analysing Notch–Delta signalling dynamics in individual mammalian cells, with the aim of addressing these issues. By controlling both cis- and trans-Delta concentrations, and monitoring the dynamics of a Notch reporter, we measured the combined cis–trans input–output relationship in the Notch–Delta system. The data revealed a striking difference between the responses of Notch to trans- and cis-Delta: whereas the response to trans-Delta is graded, the response to cis-Delta is sharp and occurs at a fixed threshold, independent of trans-Delta. We developed a simple mathematical model that shows how these behaviours emerge from the mutual inactivation of Notch and Delta proteins in the same cell. This interaction generates an ultrasensitive switch between mutually exclusive sending (high Delta/low Notch) and receiving (high Notch/low Delta) signalling states. At the multicellular level, this switch can amplify small differences between neighbouring cells even without transcription-mediated feedback. This Notch–Delta signalling switch facilitates the formation of sharp boundaries and lateral-inhibition patterns in models of development, and provides insight into previously unexplained mutant behaviours.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Bray, S. J. (2016) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm.2016.94 · Cited by 1,012
Notch signaling: simplicity in design, versatility in function
Andersson, E. R., Sandberg, R., & Lendahl, U. (2011) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.063610 · Cited by 950
Defining cell types and states with single-cell genomics
Trapnell, C. (2015) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.190595.115 · Cited by 813
The Varied Roles of Notch in Cancer
Aster, J. C., Pear, W. S., & Blacklow, S. C. (2017) · Annual Review of Pathology: Mechanisms of Disease · doi:10.1146/annurev-pathol-052016-100127 · Cited by 710
Human-Specific NOTCH2NL Genes Expand Cortical Neurogenesis through Delta/Notch Regulation
Suzuki, I. K., Gacquer, D., Van Heurck, R., Kumar, D., Wojno, M., Bilheu, A., Herpoel, A., Lambert, N., Cheron, J., Polleux, F., et al. (2018) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2018.03.067 · Cited by 471
Metadata
- Authors
- Sprinzak, D., Lakhanpal, A., LeBon, L., Santat, L. A., Fontes, M. E., Anderson, G. A., Garcia-Ojalvo, J., & Elowitz, M. B.
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2010-04-25
- Volume
- 465
- Issue
- 7294
- Pages
- 86-90
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- OpenAlex
- W2043854809
- Cited by
- 637
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 17.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cis-interactions between Notch and Delta generate mutually exclusive signalling states. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/nature08959
- The paper
- Sprinzak, D., Lakhanpal, A., LeBon, L., Santat, L. A., Fontes, M. E., Anderson, G. A., Garcia-Ojalvo, J., & Elowitz, M. B. (2010). Cis-interactions between Notch and Delta generate mutually exclusive signalling states. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08959
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.