The DOI matches its Crossref record.
In vivo imaging of Treg cells providing immune privilege to the haematopoietic stem-cell niche
Open accessAbstract
Stem cells reside in a specialized regulatory microenvironment or niche, where they receive appropriate support for maintaining self-renewal and multi-lineage differentiation capacity. The niche may also protect stem cells from environmental insults including cytotoxic chemotherapy and perhaps pathogenic immunity. The testis, hair follicle and placenta are all sites of residence for stem cells and are immune-suppressive environments, called immune-privileged sites, where multiple mechanisms cooperate to prevent immune attack, even enabling prolonged survival of foreign allografts without immunosuppression. We sought to determine if somatic stem-cell niches more broadly are immune-privileged sites by examining the haematopoietic stem/progenitor cell (HSPC) niche in the bone marrow, a site where immune reactivity exists. We observed persistence of HSPCs from allogeneic donor mice (allo-HSPCs) in non-irradiated recipient mice for 30 days without immunosuppression with the same survival frequency compared to syngeneic HSPCs. These HSPCs were lost after the depletion of FoxP3 regulatory T (Treg) cells. High-resolution in vivo imaging over time demonstrated marked co-localization of HSPCs with Treg cells that accumulated on the endosteal surface in the calvarial and trabecular bone marrow. Treg cells seem to participate in creating a localized zone where HSPCs reside and where Treg cells are necessary for allo-HSPC persistence. In addition to processes supporting stem-cell function, the niche will provide a relative sanctuary from immune attack.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Adult haematopoietic stem cell niches
Crane, G. M., Jeffery, E., & Morrison, S. J. (2017) · Nature Reviews Immunology · doi:10.1038/nri.2017.53 · Cited by 712
Regulatory T Cells in Skin Facilitate Epithelial Stem Cell Differentiation
Ali, N., Zirak, B., Rodriguez, R. S., Pauli, M. L., Truong, H.-A., Lai, K., Ahn, R., Corbin, K., Lowe, M. M., Scharschmidt, T. C., et al. (2017) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2017.05.002 · Cited by 680
Cancer stem cell–immune cell crosstalk in tumour progression
Bayik, D., & Lathia, J. D. (2021) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/s41568-021-00366-w · Cited by 561
Frenette, P. S., Pinho, S., Lucas, D., & Scheiermann, C. (2013) · Annual Review of Immunology · doi:10.1146/annurev-immunol-032712-095919 · Cited by 462
Principles of regulatory T cell function
Dikiy, S., & Rudensky, A. Y. (2023) · Immunity · doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2023.01.004 · Cited by 445
Metadata
- Authors
- Fujisaki, J., Wu, J., Carlson, A. L., Silberstein, L., Putheti, P., Larocca, R., Gao, W., Saito, T. I., Celso, C. L., Tsuyuzaki, H., Sato, T., Côté, D., Sykes, M., Strom, T. B., Scadden, D. T., & Lin, C. P.
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2011-06
- Volume
- 474
- Issue
- 7350
- Pages
- 216-219
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- OpenAlex
- W2806760348
- Cited by
- 567
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 25.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: In vivo imaging of Treg cells providing immune privilege to the haematopoietic stem-cell niche. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/nature10160
- The paper
- Fujisaki, J., Wu, J., Carlson, A. L., Silberstein, L., Putheti, P., Larocca, R., Gao, W., Saito, T. I., Celso, C. L., Tsuyuzaki, H., Sato, T., Côté, D., Sykes, M., Strom, T. B., Scadden, D. T., & Lin, C. P. (2011). In vivo imaging of Treg cells providing immune privilege to the haematopoietic stem-cell niche. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10160
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.