Cited by 496Genetics and Neurodevelopmental DisordersNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchAutism Spectrum Disorder Research

A role for glia in the progression of Rett’s syndrome

Open access
Lioy, Daniel T., Garg, Saurabh K., Monaghan, Caitlin E., Raber, Jacob, Foust, Kevin D., Kaspar, Brian K., Hirrlinger, Petra G., Kirchhoff, Frank +3 more·2011·Nature

Abstract

Rett's syndrome (RTT) is an X-chromosome-linked autism spectrum disorder caused by loss of function of the transcription factor methyl-CpG-binding protein 2 (MeCP2). Although MeCP2 is expressed in most tissues, loss of MeCP2 expression results primarily in neurological symptoms. Earlier studies suggested the idea that RTT is due exclusively to loss of MeCP2 function in neurons. Although defective neurons clearly underlie the aberrant behaviours, we and others showed recently that the loss of MECP2 from glia negatively influences neurons in a non-cell-autonomous fashion. Here we show that in globally MeCP2-deficient mice, re-expression of Mecp2 preferentially in astrocytes significantly improved locomotion and anxiety levels, restored respiratory abnormalities to a normal pattern, and greatly prolonged lifespan compared to globally null mice. Furthermore, restoration of MeCP2 in the mutant astrocytes exerted a non-cell-autonomous positive effect on mutant neurons in vivo, restoring normal dendritic morphology and increasing levels of the excitatory glutamate transporter VGLUT1. Our study shows that glia, like neurons, are integral components of the neuropathology of RTT, and supports the targeting of glia as a strategy for improving the associated symptoms.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nature10214

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Selective reactivation of Mecp2 expression in astrocytes of Mecp2 knock-out mice results in significant rescue of behavioral and neuronal phenotype.

    “selective reactivation of Mecp2 expression in astrocytes of Mecp2 KO mice resulted in a significant rescue of both behavioral and neuronal phenotype”

    From Impaired astrocyte-to-neuron cholesterol trafficking drives synaptic dysfunction in Rett syndrome (2026) · cites this paper as Lioy et al., 2011

    The passages on behavior and neuronal anatomy report improved behavioral measures and restored dendritic branching and other neuronal measures after astrocytic MeCP2 re-expression. However, the experiments used Mecp2Stop mice, not complete Mecp2 knockouts: the paper notes residual MeCP2 expression from the stop allele and distinguishes these mice from Mecp2-/y mice. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Re-introducing MeCP2 to astrocytes of Mecp2 null mice using GFAP-Cre improves symptoms and restores dendritic morphology.

    “Moreover, deletion of MeCP2 from glial cells induces a RTT-like phenotype, and re-introducing MeCP2 to astrocytes of Mecp2 null mice using GFAP-Cre improves symptoms and restores dendritic morphology [193,194].”

    From Rett syndrome: a neurological disorder with metabolic components (2018) · cites this paper as [193]

    The paper reports that tamoxifen-induced MeCP2 re-expression using hGFAPcreT2 improved RTT-like symptoms and restored the number of apical dendritic branches (passages 2, 3, and 6). However, the rescue mice carried a Mecp2Stop allele, not a true null allele: the paper distinguishes them from Mecp2-/y mice and reports residual MeCP2 expression from the stop locus (passage 8). (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Deletion of MeCP2 from glial cells induces a RTT-like phenotype.

    “Moreover, deletion of MeCP2 from glial cells induces a RTT-like phenotype, and re-introducing MeCP2 to astrocytes of Mecp2 null mice using GFAP-Cre improves symptoms and restores dendritic morphology [193,194].”
  • Astrocytes supplement neuronal cholesterol through lipoprotein transfer.

    “since astrocytes supplement neuronal cholesterol through lipoprotein transfer45,46.”

    From A suppressor screen in Mecp2 mutant mice implicates cholesterol metabolism in Rett syndrome (2013) · cites this paper as [45]

    The paper’s Abstract reports that restoring MeCP2 in astrocytes improves neuronal morphology and other Rett-like features in mice, but it does not describe cholesterol supplementation or lipoprotein transfer. Searches for cholesterol, lipoproteins, and astrocyte-to-neuron lipid transfer found no passage addressing that mechanism in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 29

  1. [1]Chahrour M Zoghbi HY Neuron 2007 56 422 37 17988628
  2. [2]Shahbazian MD Antalffy B Armstrong DL Zoghbi HY Hum. Mol. Genet 2002 11 115 11809720
  3. [3]Guy J Hendrich B Holmes M Martin JE Bird A Nat. Genet 2001 3 322 6 11242117
  4. [4]Chen RZ Akbarian S Tudor M Jaenisch R Nat. Genet 2001 3 327 31 11242118
  5. [5]Kishi N Macklis JD Mol. Cell Neurosci 2004 27 306 21 15519245
  6. [6]McGill BE Bundle SF Yaylaoglu MB Carson JP Thaller C Zoghbi HY PNAS 2006 103 18267 72 17108082 PMC1636379
  7. [7]Fyffe SL Neuron 2008 59 947 58 18817733 PMC2597031
  8. [8]Samaco RC PNAS 2009 106 21966 71 20007372 PMC2799790
  9. [9]Luikenhuis S Giacometti E Beard CF Jaenisch R PNAS 2004 101 6033 8 15069197 PMC395918
  10. [10]Chao HT Nature 2010 468 263 9 21068835 PMC3057962
  11. [11]Ballas N Lioy DT Grunseich C Mandel G Nat. Neurosci 2009 12 311 7 19234456 PMC3134296
  12. [12]Maezawa I Swanberg S Harvey D LaSalle JM Jin LW J. Neurosci 2009 29 5051 61 19386901 PMC3436907
  13. [13]Maezawa I Jin LW J. Neurosci 2010 30 5346 56 20392956 PMC5533099
  14. [14]Guy J Gan J Selfridge J Cobb S Bird A Science 2007 315 1143 7 17289941 PMC7610836
  15. [15]Hirrlinger PG Scheller A Braun C Hirrlinger J Kirchhoff F Glia 2006 54 11 20 16575885
  16. [16]Brenner M Kisseberth WC Su Y Besnard F Messing A J. Neurosci 1994 14 1030 7 8120611 PMC6577554
  17. [17]Chow L Zhang J Baker SJ Transgenic Res 2008 17 919 28 18483774 PMC2522290
  18. [18]Casper KB Jones K McCarthy KD Genesis 2007 45 292 9 17457931
  19. [19]Foust KD Nurre E Montgomery CL Hernandez A Chan CM Kaspar BK Nat. Biotechnol 2008 27 59 65 19098898 PMC2895694
  20. [20]Stearns NA Schaevitz LR Bowling H Nag N Berger UV Berger-Sweeney J Neurosci 2007 146 907 21 17383101
  21. [21]Pelka GJ Brain 2006 129 Pt. 887-98 16467389
  22. [22]Weese-Mayer DE Pediatr. Res 2006 60 443 9 16940240
  23. [23]Viemari J J. Neurosci 2005 25 11521 30 16354910 PMC6726028
  24. [24]Bauman ML Kemper TL Arin DM Neurol 1995 45 1581 6 7644058
  25. [25]Armstrong DD J. Child Neurol 2005 20 747 53 16225830
  26. [26]Chao HT Zoghbi HY Rosenmund C Neuron 2007 56 58 65 17920015 PMC2198899
  27. [27]Marchetto ML Cell 2010 143 527 39 21074045 PMC3003590
  28. [28]Ilieva H Polymenidou M Cleveland DW J. Cell Biol 2009 187 761 72 19951898 PMC2806318
  29. [29]Gemelli T Berton O Nelson ED Perrotti LI Jaenisch R Monteggia LM Biol. Psych 2006 59 468 76 16199017

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lioy, D. T., Garg, S. K., Monaghan, C. E., Raber, J., Foust, K. D., Kaspar, B. K., Hirrlinger, P. G., Kirchhoff, F., Bissonnette, J. M., Ballas, N., & Mandel, G.
Affiliations
  • Oregon Health & Science University (US)
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
  • Oregon National Primate Research Center (US)
  • Nationwide Children's Hospital (US)
  • Leipzig University (DE)
  • Max Planck Institute of Experimental Medicine (DE)
  • Stony Brook University (US)
Corresponding author
Mandel, Gail
Venue
Nature
Published
2011-06-29
Volume
475
Issue
7357
Pages
497-500
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2026751327
Cited by
496
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 31 · 2016: 49 · 2015: 53 · 2014: 45 · 2013: 54 · 2012: 53
FWCI
32.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (P30NS061800)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD056503)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
Keywords
MeCP2, glia, astrocytes, non-cell-autonomous effects, neuron-glia interactions, autism spectrum disorder, dendritic morphology, VGLUT1, glutamate transporters, locomotion, anxiety, respiratory abnormalities, lifespan, neuropathology
MeSH terms
Animals, Anxiety, Astrocytes, Behavior, Animal, Female, Gene Expression Regulation, Male, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Motor Activity, Neuroglia, Neurons, Rett Syndrome, Disease Progression, Vesicular Glutamate Transport Protein 1, Mice, Methyl-CpG-Binding Protein 2

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review