Cited by 206Genetics and Neurodevelopmental DisordersAnimal testing and alternativesNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

Preclinical research in Rett syndrome: setting the foundation for translational success

Open access
Katz, David M., Berger-Sweeney, Joanne E., Eubanks, James H., Justice, Monica J., Neul, Jeffrey L., Pozzo-Miller, Lucas, Blue, Mary E., Christian, Diana +12 more·2012·Disease Models & Mechanisms

Abstract

In September of 2011, the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS), the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD), the International Rett Syndrome Foundation (IRSF) and the Rett Syndrome Research Trust (RSRT) convened a workshop involving a broad cross-section of basic scientists, clinicians and representatives from the National Institutes of Health (NIH), the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the pharmaceutical industry and private foundations to assess the state of the art in animal studies of Rett syndrome (RTT). The aim of the workshop was to identify crucial knowledge gaps and to suggest scientific priorities and best practices for the use of animal models in preclinical evaluation of potential new RTT therapeutics. This review summarizes outcomes from the workshop and extensive follow-up discussions among participants, and includes: (1) a comprehensive summary of the physiological and behavioral phenotypes of RTT mouse models to date, and areas in which further phenotypic analyses are required to enhance the utility of these models for translational studies; (2) discussion of the impact of genetic differences among mouse models, and methodological differences among laboratories, on the expression and analysis, respectively, of phenotypic traits; and (3) definitions of the standards that the community of RTT researchers can implement for rigorous preclinical study design and transparent reporting to ensure that decisions to initiate costly clinical trials are grounded in reliable preclinical data.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1242/dmm.011007

Cites

143 of 143 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Katz, D. M., Berger-Sweeney, J. E., Eubanks, J. H., Justice, M. J., Neul, J. L., Pozzo-Miller, L., Blue, M. E., Christian, D., Crawley, J. N., Giustetto, M., Guy, J., Howell, C. J., Kron, M., Nelson, S. B., Samaco, R. C., Schaevitz, L. R., St. Hillaire-Clarke, C., Young, J. L., Zoghbi, H. Y., & Mamounas, L. A.
Affiliations
  • Case Western Reserve University (US)
  • Tufts University (US)
  • Toronto Western Research Institute, 399 Bathurst Street, Mac 11-408, Toronto, ON M5T 2S8, Canada
  • Baylor College of Medicine (US)
  • Department of Neurobiology, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1825 University Boulevard, SHEL-1002, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA
  • Kennedy Krieger Institute (US)
  • University of California, Davis (US)
  • University of Turin (IT)
  • University of Edinburgh (GB)
  • Brandeis University (US)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, 6001 Executive Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
  • University of Miami (US)
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
Corresponding author
  • Katz, David M.
  • Zoghbi, Huda Y.
  • Mamounas, Laura A.
Venue
Disease Models & Mechanisms
Published
2012-11-01
Volume
5
Issue
6
Pages
733-745
ISSN
  • 1754-8403 (ISSN-L)
  • 1754-8411
OpenAlex
W2104054545
Cited by
206
References
143
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-sa
Locations
  • Disease Models & Mechanisms (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Institutional Research Information System University of Turin (University of Turin) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  • International Rett Syndrome Foundation
  • Rett Syndrome Research Trust
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research (106481_1)
  • National Human Genome Research Institute (U54HG006348)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS065027, NS‐065027, T32NS043124, R01NS057398, R56NS057398, NS-057398)
  • National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD062553)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal testing and alternatives
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Keywords
Rett syndrome, animal models, mouse model, preclinical research, translational research, phenotyping, preclinical study design, reporting transparency, treatment evaluation, research priorities
MeSH terms
Animals, Congresses as Topic, Disease Models, Animal, Humans, Rett Syndrome, Guidelines as Topic, Translational Research, Biomedical, Research Report

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review