Diffraction-unlimited all-optical imaging and writing with a photochromic GFP
Open accessAbstract
Lens-based optical microscopy failed to discern fluorescent features closer than 200 nm for decades, but the recent breaking of the diffraction resolution barrier by sequentially switching the fluorescence capability of adjacent features on and off is making nanoscale imaging routine. Reported fluorescence nanoscopy variants switch these features either with intense beams at defined positions or randomly, molecule by molecule. Here we demonstrate an optical nanoscopy that records raw data images from living cells and tissues with low levels of light. This advance has been facilitated by the generation of reversibly switchable enhanced green fluorescent protein (rsEGFP), a fluorescent protein that can be reversibly photoswitched more than a thousand times. Distributions of functional rsEGFP-fusion proteins in living bacteria and mammalian cells are imaged at <40-nanometre resolution. Dendritic spines in living brain slices are super-resolved with about a million times lower light intensities than before. The reversible switching also enables all-optical writing of features with subdiffraction size and spacings, which can be used for data storage.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
RESOLFT reduces the size of the confocal volume using a specifically engineered fluorescent protein that can transition to a non-fluorescent dark state.
“To circumvent this, a comparable technique reduces the size of the confocal volume using a specifically engineered fluorescent protein that can transition to a non-fluorescent dark state (RESOLFT: reversible saturable/switchable optical transitions; Grotjohann et al., 2011).”
From Barriers in the brain: resolving dendritic spine morphology and compartmentalization (2014) · cites this paper as Grotjohann et al., 2011
Cites
Highly Nonlinear Photodamage in Two-Photon Fluorescence Microscopy
Hopt, A., & Neher, E. (2001) · Biophysical Journal · doi:10.1016/s0006-3495(01)76173-5 · Cited by 442 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Next-Generation Digital Information Storage in DNA
Church, G. M., Gao, Y., & Kosuri, S. (2012) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1226355 · Cited by 1,441 · see citing works
Optical storage arrays: a perspective for future big data storage
Gu, M., Li, X., & Cao, Y. (2014) · Light: Science & Applications · doi:10.1038/lsa.2014.58 · Cited by 542 · see citing works
Schmidt, R., Weihs, T., Wurm, C. A., Jansen, I., Rehman, J., Sahl, S. J., & Hell, S. W. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-21652-z · Cited by 306 · see citing works
Self-citationNanoscopy of living brain slices with low light levels
Testa, I., Urban, N. T., Jakobs, S., Eggeling, C., Willig, K. I., & Hell, S. W. (2012) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2012.07.028 · Cited by 131 · see citing works
Self-citationBarriers in the brain: resolving dendritic spine morphology and compartmentalization
Adrian, M., Kusters, R., Wierenga, C. J., Storm, C., Hoogenraad, C. C., & Kapitein, L. C. (2014) · Frontiers in Neuroanatomy · doi:10.3389/fnana.2014.00142 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
“In addition, we review the evidence for specific biochemical compartmentalization of calcium ions and signaling molecules.”
- Authors
- Grotjohann, T., Testa, I., Leutenegger, M., Bock, H., Urban, N. T., Lavoie-Cardinal, F., Willig, K. I., Eggeling, C., Jakobs, S., & Hell, S. W.
- Affiliations
- Max Planck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry (DE)
- Universitätsmedizin Göttingen (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Jakobs, Stefan
- Hell, Stefan W.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2011-09-11
- Volume
- 478
- Issue
- 7368
- Pages
- 204-208
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- OpenAlex
- W2023719640
- Cited by
- 501
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 18 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 40 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 35 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 35 · 2015: 36 · 2014: 40 · 2013: 48 · 2012: 56
- FWCI
- 27.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- infoscience.epfl.ch
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Nature (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
- Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion)
- Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion)
- Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- GRO (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
- OPUS (Augsburg University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biophysics › Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Photochromic and Fluorescence Chemistry
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications
- Keywords
- super-resolution microscopy, diffraction-limited imaging, live-cell imaging, dendritic spines, photoswitching, low-light imaging, GFP fusion protein
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Brain, Cell Line, Cell Survival, Dendrites, Escherichia coli, Light, Microscopy, Fluorescence, Equipment Reuse, Nanotechnology, Photobleaching, Green Fluorescent Proteins, Optics and Photonics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review