Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 914

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

In vivo genome editing using a high-efficiency TALEN system

Open access
Bedell, Victoria M., Wang, Ying, Campbell, Jarryd M., Poshusta, Tanya L., Starker, Colby G., Krug II, Randall G., Tan, Wenfang, Penheiter, Sumedha G., Ma, Alvin C., Leung, Anskar Y. H., Fahrenkrug, Scott C., Carlson, Daniel F., Voytas, Daniel F., Clark, Karl J., Essner, Jeffrey J., Ekker, Stephen C.·2012·Nature

Abstract

The zebrafish (Danio rerio) is increasingly being used to study basic vertebrate biology and human disease with a rich array of in vivo genetic and molecular tools. However, the inability to readily modify the genome in a targeted fashion has been a bottleneck in the field. Here we show that improvements in artificial transcription activator-like effector nucleases (TALENs) provide a powerful new approach for targeted zebrafish genome editing and functional genomic applications. Using the GoldyTALEN modified scaffold and zebrafish delivery system, we show that this enhanced TALEN toolkit has a high efficiency in inducing locus-specific DNA breaks in somatic and germline tissues. At some loci, this efficacy approaches 100%, including biallelic conversion in somatic tissues that mimics phenotypes seen using morpholino-based targeted gene knockdowns. With this updated TALEN system, we successfully used single-stranded DNA oligonucleotides to precisely modify sequences at predefined locations in the zebrafish genome through homology-directed repair, including the introduction of a custom-designed EcoRV site and a modified loxP (mloxP) sequence into somatic tissue in vivo. We further show successful germline transmission of both EcoRV and mloxP engineered chromosomes. This combined approach offers the potential to model genetic variation as well as to generate targeted conditional alleles.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nature11537

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 27 references

Cited by

See all 914

Metadata

Authors
Bedell, V. M., Wang, Y., Campbell, J. M., Poshusta, T. L., Starker, C. G., Krug II, R. G., Tan, W., Penheiter, S. G., Ma, A. C., Leung, A. Y. H., Fahrenkrug, S. C., Carlson, D. F., Voytas, D. F., Clark, K. J., Essner, J. J., & Ekker, S. C.
Venue
Nature
Published
2012-09-23
Volume
491
Issue
7422
Pages
114-118
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W1999068651
Cited by
914
References
27
FWCI
50.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: In vivo genome editing using a high-efficiency TALEN system. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/nature11537
The paper
Bedell, V. M., Wang, Y., Campbell, J. M., Poshusta, T. L., Starker, C. G., Krug II, R. G., Tan, W., Penheiter, S. G., Ma, A. C., Leung, A. Y. H., Fahrenkrug, S. C., Carlson, D. F., Voytas, D. F., Clark, K. J., Essner, J. J., & Ekker, S. C. (2012). In vivo genome editing using a high-efficiency TALEN system. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11537

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.