Cited by 800Zebrafish Biomedical Research ApplicationsHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationDevelopmental Biology and Gene Regulation

Transplantation and in vivo imaging of multilineage engraftment in zebrafish bloodless mutants

Traver, David, Paw, Barry H, Poss, Kenneth D, Penberthy, W Todd, Lin, Shuo, Zon, Leonard I·2003·Nature Immunology

Abstract

The zebrafish is firmly established as a genetic model for the study of vertebrate blood development. Here we have characterized the blood-forming system of adult zebrafish. Each major blood lineage can be isolated by flow cytometry, and with these lineal profiles, defects in zebrafish blood mutants can be quantified. We developed hematopoietic cell transplantation to study cell autonomy of mutant gene function and to establish a hematopoietic stem cell assay. Hematopoietic cell transplantation can rescue multilineage hematopoiesis in embryonic lethal gata1-/- mutants for over 6 months. Direct visualization of fluorescent donor cells in embryonic recipients allows engraftment and homing events to be imaged in real time. These results provide a cellular context in which to study the genetics of hematopoiesis.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/ni1007

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The transplantable hematopoietic stem/progenitor cell marrow population resides within the adult kidney and can be isolated using flow cytometric analysis of forward and side scatter.

    “Prior work from our laboratory has demonstrated that the transplantable hematopoietic stem/progenitor (HSPC) marrow population resides within the adult kidney, and can be isolated using flow cytometric analysis of forward and side scatter”

    From Transparent Adult Zebrafish as a Tool for In Vivo Transplantation Analysis (2008) · cites this paper as Traver et al., 2003

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Traver, D., Paw, B. H., Poss, K. D., Penberthy, W. T., Lin, S., & Zon, L. I.
Affiliations
  • Boston Children's Hospital (US)
  • Duke University (US)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Corresponding author
Zon, Leonard I
Venue
Nature Immunology
Published
2003-11-09
Volume
4
Issue
12
Pages
1238-1246
ISSN
  • 1529-2908 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2916
OpenAlex
W2112528263
Cited by
800
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 37 · 2025: 42 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 41 · 2021: 44 · 2020: 49 · 2019: 43 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 40 · 2016: 46 · 2015: 42 · 2014: 37 · 2013: 38 · 2012: 53
FWCI
5.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Immunology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Zebrafish Biomedical Research Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
Keywords
zebrafish, hematopoiesis, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, multilineage engraftment, hematopoietic stem cells, cell autonomy, in vivo imaging, blood development
MeSH terms
Animals, Blood Cells, Blood Physiological Phenomena, Flow Cytometry, Hematopoietic Stem Cells, Hematopoietic System, Kidney, Mutation, Spleen, Zebrafish, Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Cell Lineage, Animals, Genetically Modified

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review