Cited by 232Gene Regulatory Network AnalysisMicrotubule and mitosis dynamicsMathematical Biology Tumor Growth

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Dynamics extracted from fixed cells reveal feedback linking cell growth to cell cycle

Open access

Abstract

Biologists have long been concerned about what constrains variation in cell size, but progress in this field has been slow and stymied by experimental limitations. Here we describe a new method, ergodic rate analysis (ERA), that uses single-cell measurements of fixed steady-state populations to accurately infer the rates of molecular events, including rates of cell growth. ERA exploits the fact that the number of cells in a particular state is related to the average transit time through that state. With this method, it is possible to calculate full time trajectories of any feature that can be labelled in fixed cells, for example levels of phosphoproteins or total cellular mass. Using ERA we find evidence for a size-discriminatory process at the G1/S transition that acts to decrease cell-to-cell size variation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nature11897

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 11 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 228

Metadata

Authors
Kafri, R., Levy, J., Ginzberg, M. B., Oh, S., Lahav, G., & Kirschner, M. W.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • University of Ottawa (CA)
Corresponding author
Kirschner, Marc W.
Venue
Nature
Published
2013-02
Volume
494
Issue
7438
Pages
480-483
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2087252982
Cited by
232
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 31 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 7
FWCI
9.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM083303, R01GM026875, GM 26875)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Microtubule and mitosis dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Modeling and Simulation › Mathematical Biology Tumor Growth
Keywords
cell size control, cell growth rate, cell cycle, G1/S transition, single-cell measurement, transit time
MeSH terms
Cell Count, Cell Cycle, Cell Line, Cycloheximide, Dimethyl Sulfoxide, HeLa Cells, Humans, Leupeptins, Phosphoproteins, G1 Phase, S Phase, Sirolimus, Feedback, Physiological, Cell Size, Cell Proliferation, Single-Cell Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review