The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Optical magnetic imaging of living cells
Open accessAbstract
Magnetic imaging is a powerful tool for probing biological and physical systems. However, existing techniques either have poor spatial resolution compared to optical microscopy and are hence not generally applicable to imaging of sub-cellular structure (for example, magnetic resonance imaging), or entail operating conditions that preclude application to living biological samples while providing submicrometre resolution (for example, scanning superconducting quantum interference device microscopy, electron holography and magnetic resonance force microscopy). Here we demonstrate magnetic imaging of living cells (magnetotactic bacteria) under ambient laboratory conditions and with sub-cellular spatial resolution (400 nanometres), using an optically detected magnetic field imaging array consisting of a nanometre-scale layer of nitrogen–vacancy colour centres implanted at the surface of a diamond chip. With the bacteria placed on the diamond surface, we optically probe the nitrogen–vacancy quantum spin states and rapidly reconstruct images of the vector components of the magnetic field created by chains of magnetic nanoparticles (magnetosomes) produced in the bacteria. We also spatially correlate these magnetic field maps with optical images acquired in the same apparatus. Wide-field microscopy allows parallel optical and magnetic imaging of multiple cells in a population with submicrometre resolution and a field of view in excess of 100 micrometres. Scanning electron microscope images of the bacteria confirm that the correlated optical and magnetic images can be used to locate and characterize the magnetosomes in each bacterium. Our results provide a new capability for imaging bio-magnetic structures in living cells under ambient conditions with high spatial resolution, and will enable the mapping of a wide range of magnetic signals within cells and cellular networks.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Degen, C. L., Reinhard, F., & Cappellaro, P. (2017) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.89.035002 · Cited by 4,045
Optical magnetic detection of single-neuron action potentials using quantum defects in diamond
Barry, J. F., Turner, M. J., Schloss, J. M., Glenn, D. R., Song, Y., Lukin, M. D., Park, H., & Walsworth, R. L. (2016) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1601513113 · Cited by 637
Self-citationUltrasensitive Magnetic Field Sensors for Biomedical Applications
Murzin, D., Mapps, D. J., Levada, K., Belyaev, V., Omelyanchik, A., Panina, L., & Rodionova, V. (2020) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s20061569 · Cited by 277
Deng, Z., Wang, Q., Liu, Z., Zhang, M., Machado, A. C. D., Chiu, T.-P., Feng, C., Zhang, Q., Yu, L., Qi, L., et al. (2015) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms8642 · Cited by 117
Variational-state quantum metrology
Koczor, B., Endo, S., Jones, T., Matsuzaki, Y., & Benjamin, S. C. (2020) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/ab965e · Cited by 101
Metadata
- Authors
- Le Sage, D., Arai, K., Glenn, D. R., DeVience, S. J., Pham, L. M., Rahn-Lee, L., Lukin, M. D., Yacoby, A., Komeili, A., & Walsworth, R. L.
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2013-04
- Volume
- 496
- Issue
- 7446
- Pages
- 486-489
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- OpenAlex
- W2133342962
- Cited by
- 730
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 22.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Optical magnetic imaging of living cells. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/nature12072
- The paper
- Le Sage, D., Arai, K., Glenn, D. R., DeVience, S. J., Pham, L. M., Rahn-Lee, L., Lukin, M. D., Yacoby, A., Komeili, A., & Walsworth, R. L. (2013). Optical magnetic imaging of living cells. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12072
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.