Cited by 2,198Advanced Proteomics Techniques and ApplicationsMass Spectrometry Techniques and ApplicationsBioinformatics and Genomic Networks

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 45 of the 45 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A draft map of the human proteome

Open access

Abstract

The availability of human genome sequence has transformed biomedical research over the past decade. However, an equivalent map for the human proteome with direct measurements of proteins and peptides does not exist yet. Here we present a draft map of the human proteome using high-resolution Fourier-transform mass spectrometry. In-depth proteomic profiling of 30 histologically normal human samples, including 17 adult tissues, 7 fetal tissues and 6 purified primary haematopoietic cells, resulted in identification of proteins encoded by 17,294 genes accounting for approximately 84% of the total annotated protein-coding genes in humans. A unique and comprehensive strategy for proteogenomic analysis enabled us to discover a number of novel protein-coding regions, which includes translated pseudogenes, non-coding RNAs and upstream open reading frames. This large human proteome catalogue (available as an interactive web-based resource at http://www.humanproteomemap.org) will complement available human genome and transcriptome data to accelerate biomedical research in health and disease.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nature13302

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 45 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 601–700 of 1,002

Metadata

Authors
Kim, M.-S., Pinto, S. M., Getnet, D., Nirujogi, R. S., Manda, S. S., Chaerkady, R., Madugundu, A. K., Kelkar, D. S., Isserlin, R., Jain, S., Thomas, J. K., Muthusamy, B., Leal-Rojas, P., Kumar, P., Sahasrabuddhe, N. A., Balakrishnan, L., Advani, J., George, B., Renuse, S., Selvan, L. D. N., Patil, A. H., Nanjappa, V., Radhakrishnan, A., Prasad, S., Subbannayya, T., Raju, R., Kumar, M., Sreenivasamurthy, S. K., Marimuthu, A., Sathe, G. J., Chavan, S., Datta, K. K., Subbannayya, Y., Sahu, A., Yelamanchi, S. D., Jayaram, S., Rajagopalan, P., Sharma, J., Murthy, K. R., Syed, N., Goel, R., Khan, A. A., Ahmad, S., Dey, G., Mudgal, K., Chatterjee, A., Huang, T.-C., Zhong, J., Wu, X., Shaw, P. G., Freed, D., Zahari, M. S., Mukherjee, K. K., Shankar, S., Mahadevan, A., Lam, H., Mitchell, C. J., Shankar, S. K., Satishchandra, P., Schroeder, J. T., Sirdeshmukh, R., Maitra, A., Leach, S. D., Drake, C. G., Halushka, M. K., Prasad, T. S. K., Hruban, R. H., Kerr, C. L., Bader, G. D., Iacobuzio-Donahue, C. A., Gowda, H., & Pandey, A.
Affiliations
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • Institute of Bioinformatics (IN)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • Imperial College London (GB)
  • Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (IN)
  • National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences (IN)
  • Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (HK)
Corresponding author
  • Gowda, Harsha
  • Pandey, Akhilesh
Venue
Nature
Published
2014-05-28
Volume
509
Issue
7502
Pages
575-581
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2056499061
Cited by
2,198
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 59 · 2025: 93 · 2024: 110 · 2023: 150 · 2022: 151 · 2021: 201 · 2020: 177 · 2019: 176 · 2018: 203 · 2017: 244 · 2016: 253 · 2015: 276 · 2014: 102
FWCI
125.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Discovery Research Portal (University of Dundee) (submittedVersion)
  • Omeka S (Universidad de La Frontera) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Rare & Special e-Zone (The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (HHS-N268201000032C)
  • National Cancer Institute (U24CA160036)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (T32GM007814, U54GM103520, P41GM103504)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
Keywords
human proteome, proteome map, proteogenomics, non-coding RNA, upstream open reading frames, protein-coding genes, human tissue, hematopoietic cells, fetal tissue, tissue-specific proteins, long intergenic non-coding RNA, mRNA-protein correlation, Human Protein Atlas
MeSH terms
Adult, Cells, Cultured, Fetus, Fourier Analysis, Hematopoietic Stem Cells, Humans, Organ Specificity, Pseudogenes, Mass Spectrometry, Protein Biosynthesis, Reproducibility of Results, Genome, Human, Open Reading Frames, Protein Isoforms, Internet, Untranslated Regions, Proteome, Gene Expression Profiling, Protein Transport, Protein Sorting Signals, RNA, Untranslated, Databases, Protein, Proteomics, Molecular Sequence Annotation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review