The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Quantum control and process tomography of a semiconductor quantum dot hybrid qubit
Open accessAbstract
The similarities between gated quantum dots and the transistors in modern microelectronics—in fabrication methods, physical structure and voltage scales for manipulation—have led to great interest in the development of quantum bits (qubits) in semiconductor quantum dots. Although quantum dot spin qubits have demonstrated long coherence times, their manipulation is often slower than desired for important future applications, such as factoring. Furthermore, scalability and manufacturability are enhanced when qubits are as simple as possible. Previous work has increased the speed of spin qubit rotations by making use of integrated micromagnets, dynamic pumping of nuclear spins or the addition of a third quantum dot. Here we demonstrate a qubit that is a hybrid of spin and charge. It is simple, requiring neither nuclear-state preparation nor micromagnets. Unlike previous double-dot qubits, the hybrid qubit enables fast rotations about two axes of the Bloch sphere. We demonstrate full control on the Bloch sphere with π-rotation times of less than 100 picoseconds in two orthogonal directions, which is more than an order of magnitude faster than any other double-dot qubit. The speed arises from the qubit’s charge-like characteristics, and its spin-like features result in resistance to decoherence over a wide range of gate voltages. We achieve full process tomography in our electrically controlled semiconductor quantum dot qubit, extracting high fidelities of 85 per cent for X rotations (transitions between qubit states) and 94 per cent for Z rotations (phase accumulation between qubit states).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Quantum Computation and Quantum Information
Nielsen, M. A., Chuang, I., & Grover, L. K. (2002) · American Journal of Physics · doi:10.1119/1.1463744 · Cited by 21,895
Quantum computation and quantum information
Law, J. (2001) · ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes · doi:10.1145/505482.505499 · Cited by 18,842
Quantum computation with quantum dots
Loss, D., & DiVincenzo, D. P. (1998) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.57.120 · Cited by 6,840
Coherent Manipulation of Coupled Electron Spins in Semiconductor Quantum Dots
Petta, J. R., Johnson, A. C., Taylor, J. M., Laird, E. A., Yacoby, A., Lukin, M. D., Marcus, C. M., Hanson, M. P., & Gossard, A. C. (2005) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1116955 · Cited by 3,183
Spins in few-electron quantum dots
Hanson, R., Kouwenhoven, L. P., Petta, J. R., Tarucha, S., & Vandersypen, L. M. K. (2007) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.79.1217 · Cited by 2,665
Single-shot read-out of an individual electron spin in a quantum dot
Elzerman, J. M., Hanson, R., Willems van Beveren, L. H., Witkamp, B., Vandersypen, L. M. K., & Kouwenhoven, L. P. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02693 · Cited by 1,679
Driven coherent oscillations of a single electron spin in a quantum dot
Koppens, F. H. L., Buizert, C., Tielrooij, K. J., Vink, I. T., Nowack, K. C., Meunier, T., Kouwenhoven, L. P., & Vandersypen, L. M. K. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05065 · Cited by 1,359
Zwanenburg, F. A., Dzurak, A. S., Morello, A., Simmons, M. Y., Hollenberg, L. C. L., Klimeck, G., Rogge, S., Coppersmith, S. N., & Eriksson, M. A. (2013) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.85.961 · Cited by 1,210
Self-citationUniversal quantum computation with the exchange interaction
DiVincenzo, D. P., Bacon, D., Kempe, J., Burkard, G., & Whaley, K. B. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35042541 · Cited by 924
Coherent Manipulation of Electronic States in a Double Quantum Dot
Hayashi, T., Fujisawa, T., Cheong, H. D., Jeong, Y. H., & Hirayama, Y. (2003) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.91.226804 · Cited by 778
Cited by
Interfacing spin qubits in quantum dots and donors—hot, dense, and coherent
Vandersypen, L. M. K., Bluhm, H., Clarke, J. S., Dzurak, A. S., Ishihara, R., Morello, A., Reilly, D. J., Schreiber, L. R., & Veldhorst, M. (2017) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-017-0038-y · Cited by 624
Silicon CMOS architecture for a spin-based quantum computer
Veldhorst, M., Eenink, H. G. J., Yang, C. H., & Dzurak, A. S. (2017) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-017-01905-6 · Cited by 398
Semiconductor qubits in practice
Chatterjee, A., Stevenson, P., De Franceschi, S., Morello, A., de Leon, N. P., & Kuemmeth, F. (2021) · Nature Reviews Physics · doi:10.1038/s42254-021-00283-9 · Cited by 359
Reduced Sensitivity to Charge Noise in Semiconductor Spin Qubits via Symmetric Operation
Reed, M. D., Maune, B. M., Andrews, R. W., Borselli, M. G., Eng, K., Jura, M. P., Kiselev, A. A., Ladd, T. D., Merkel, S. T., Milosavljevic, I., et al. (2016) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.116.110402 · Cited by 297
Strong electron-electron interactions in Si/SiGe quantum dots
Ercan, H. E., Coppersmith, S. N., & Friesen, M. (2021) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.104.235302 · Cited by 45
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Kim, D., Shi, Z., Simmons, C. B., Ward, D. R., Prance, J. R., Koh, T. S., Gamble, J. K., Savage, D. E., Lagally, M. G., Friesen, M., Coppersmith, S. N., & Eriksson, M. A.
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2014-07-02
- Volume
- 511
- Issue
- 7507
- Pages
- 70-74
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- OpenAlex
- W2027313461
- Cited by
- 291
- References
- 35
- FWCI
- 19.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quantum control and process tomography of a semiconductor quantum dot hybrid qubit. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/nature13407
- The paper
- Kim, D., Shi, Z., Simmons, C. B., Ward, D. R., Prance, J. R., Koh, T. S., Gamble, J. K., Savage, D. E., Lagally, M. G., Friesen, M., Coppersmith, S. N., & Eriksson, M. A. (2014). Quantum control and process tomography of a semiconductor quantum dot hybrid qubit. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13407
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
