Cited by 924Quantum and electron transport phenomenaQuantum Computing Algorithms and ArchitectureQuantum Information and Cryptography

Universal quantum computation with the exchange interaction

Open access
DiVincenzo, D. P., Bacon, D., Kempe, J., Burkard, G., Whaley, K. B.·2000·Nature

Abstract

Various physical implementations of quantum computers are being investigated, although the requirements that must be met to make such devices a reality in the laboratory at present involve capabilities well beyond the state of the art. Recent solid-state approaches have used quantum dots, donor-atom nuclear spins or electron spins; in these architectures, the basic two-qubit quantum gate is generated by a tunable exchange interaction between spins (a Heisenberg interaction), whereas the one-qubit gates require control over a local magnetic field. Compared to the Heisenberg operation, the one-qubit operations are significantly slower, requiring substantially greater materials and device complexity--potentially contributing to a detrimental increase in the decoherence rate. Here we introduced an explicit scheme in which the Heisenberg interaction alone suffices to implement exactly any quantum computer circuit. This capability comes at a price of a factor of three in additional qubits, and about a factor of ten in additional two-qubit operations. Even at this cost, the ability to eliminate the complexity of one-qubit operations should accelerate progress towards solid-state implementations of quantum computation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/35042541

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The array of 12 quantum dots can be operated as physical qubits in a variety of spin encodings, including single spin qubits or exchange-only qubits.

    “The array of 12 quantum dots can be operated as physical qubits in a variety of spin encodings, including single spin qubits39 (in a 12-qubit array) or exchange-only qubits40 (in a four-qubit array).”

    From Probing single electrons across 300-mm spin qubit wafers (2024) · cites this paper as [40]

    The main text (p. 3) describes an exchange-based encoding that uses three spins per coded qubit, so a 12-spin array could in principle hold four such qubits. The paper does not establish that the citing authors’ particular 12-quantum-dot array can be operated this way; it presents a theoretical scheme rather than an operation of that array. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The classical mean hitting time between the antipodes in a one-link and two-link d-dimensional hypercube is given, for large d, by 2^d and 3^d, respectively.

    “The classical mean hitting time between the antipodes in a one-link and two-link d -dimensional hypercube is given, for large d , by 2 d and 3 d , respectively.”

    From Perfect State Transfer in Quantum Spin Networks (2004) · cites this paper as [12]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [10][10] J. Kempe, D. Bacon, D.A. Lidar and K.B. Whaley, 'Theory of Decoherence-Free FaultTolerant Universal Quantum Compuation,' submitted to Physical Review A, quantph/0004064. -

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
DiVincenzo, D. P., Bacon, D., Kempe, J., Burkard, G., & Whaley, K. B.
Affiliations
  • IBM (United States) (US)
  • Télécom Paris (FR)
  • University of Basel (CH)
Corresponding author
DiVincenzo, D. P.
Venue
Nature
Published
2000-11
Volume
408
Issue
6810
Pages
339-342
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W1629173918
Cited by
924
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 27 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 39 · 2017: 37 · 2016: 39 · 2015: 38 · 2014: 33 · 2013: 32 · 2012: 46
FWCI
27.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum and electron transport phenomena
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
Keywords
universal quantum computation, exchange interaction, Heisenberg exchange interaction, spin qubits, two-qubit gates, one-qubit gates, solid-state quantum computing, decoherence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review