The DOI matches its Crossref record; 260 of the 260 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Semiconductor qubits in practice
Open accessAbstract
In the past decade, semiconducting qubits have made great strides in overcoming decoherence, improving the prospects for scalability and have become one of the leading contenders for the development of large-scale quantum circuits. In this Review, we describe the current state of the art in semiconductor charge and spin qubits based on gate-controlled semiconductor quantum dots, shallow dopants and colour centres in wide-bandgap materials. We frame the relative strengths of the different semiconductor qubit implementations in the context of applications such as quantum simulation, computing, sensing and networks. By highlighting the status and future perspectives of the basic types of semiconductor qubits, this Review aims to serve as a technical introduction for non-specialists and a forward-looking reference for scientists intending to work in this field. Semiconductor qubits are expected to have diverse future quantum applications. This Review discusses semiconductor qubit implementations from the perspective of an ecosystem of applications, such as quantum simulation, sensing, computation and communication. Semiconductor qubits span an entire ecosystem and are extremely versatile in terms of quantum applications, particularly viewed through the lenses of quantum simulation, sensing, computation and communication. Controlling the charge degree of freedom in gated quantum dots is important for sensing of quantum objects, readout and light–matter coupling. Gate-controlled spin qubits have demonstrated long coherence times, fast two-qubit gates and fault-tolerant operation, with promising prospects for quantum computation. Shallow dopants have shown some of the longest coherence times in the solid state and high sensitivity to magnetic fields, relevant for quantum memories and sensing. Optically active defects have shown great promise as in situ sensors, and their natural ability to serve as spin–photon interfaces makes them suitable for long-distance quantum communication. Looking beyond a fault-tolerant quantum computer, semiconductor qubits will find diverse applications such as light–matter networks, scanning sensors, quantum memories, global cryptographic networks and small-scale designer simulation arrays. Semiconductor qubits span an entire ecosystem and are extremely versatile in terms of quantum applications, particularly viewed through the lenses of quantum simulation, sensing, computation and communication. Controlling the charge degree of freedom in gated quantum dots is important for sensing of quantum objects, readout and light–matter coupling. Gate-controlled spin qubits have demonstrated long coherence times, fast two-qubit gates and fault-tolerant operation, with promising prospects for quantum computation. Shallow dopants have shown some of the longest coherence times in the solid state and high sensitivity to magnetic fields, relevant for quantum memories and sensing. Optically active defects have shown great promise as in situ sensors, and their natural ability to serve as spin–photon interfaces makes them suitable for long-distance quantum communication. Looking beyond a fault-tolerant quantum computer, semiconductor qubits will find diverse applications such as light–matter networks, scanning sensors, quantum memories, global cryptographic networks and small-scale designer simulation arrays.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Quantum computation with quantum dots
Loss, D., & DiVincenzo, D. P. (1998) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.57.120 · Cited by 6,840
Degen, C. L., Reinhard, F., & Cappellaro, P. (2017) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.89.035002 · Cited by 4,045
A silicon-based nuclear spin quantum computer
Kane, B. E. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/30156 · Cited by 3,779
Coherent Manipulation of Coupled Electron Spins in Semiconductor Quantum Dots
Petta, J. R., Johnson, A. C., Taylor, J. M., Laird, E. A., Yacoby, A., Lukin, M. D., Marcus, C. M., Hanson, M. P., & Gossard, A. C. (2005) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1116955 · Cited by 3,183
Loophole-free Bell inequality violation using electron spins separated by 1.3 kilometres
Hensen, B., Bernien, H., Dréau, A. E., Reiserer, A., Kalb, N., Blok, M. S., Ruitenberg, J., Vermeulen, R. F. L., Schouten, R. N., Abellán, C., et al. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature15759 · Cited by 2,852
Nanoscale magnetic sensing with an individual electronic spin in diamond
Maze, J. R., Stanwix, P. L., Hodges, J. S., Hong, S., Taylor, J. M., Cappellaro, P., Jiang, L., Dutt, M. V. G., Togan, E., Zibrov, A. S., et al. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature07279 · Cited by 1,984
High-sensitivity diamond magnetometer with nanoscale resolution
Taylor, J. M., Cappellaro, P., Childress, L., Jiang, L., Budker, D., Hemmer, P. R., Yacoby, A., Walsworth, R., & Lukin, M. D. (2008) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/nphys1075 · Cited by 1,959
Nanometre-scale thermometry in a living cell
Kucsko, G., Maurer, P. C., Yao, N. Y., Kubo, M., Noh, H. J., Lo, P. K., Park, H., & Lukin, M. D. (2013) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature12373 · Cited by 1,951
Ultralong spin coherence time in isotopically engineered diamond
Balasubramanian, G., Neumann, P., Twitchen, D., Markham, M., Kolesov, R., Mizuochi, N., Isoya, J., Achard, J., Beck, J., Tissler, J., et al. (2009) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/nmat2420 · Cited by 1,936
Quantum metrology with nonclassical states of atomic ensembles
Pezzè, L., Smerzi, A., Oberthaler, M. K., Schmied, R., & Treutlein, P. (2018) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.90.035005 · Cited by 1,682
Cited by
Hoo Teo, K., Zhang, Y., Chowdhury, N., Rakheja, S., Ma, R., Xie, Q., Yagyu, E., Yamanaka, K., Li, K., & Palacios, T. (2021) · Journal of Applied Physics · doi:10.1063/5.0061555 · Cited by 322
High-Fidelity Bell-State Preparation with Ca + 40 Optical Qubits
Clark, C. R., Tinkey, H. N., Sawyer, B. C., Meier, A. M., Burkhardt, K. A., Seck, C. M., Shappert, C. M., Guise, N. D., Volin, C. E., Fallek, S. D., et al. (2021) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.127.130505 · Cited by 165
Shared control of a 16 semiconductor quantum dot crossbar array
Borsoi, F., Hendrickx, N. W., John, V., Meyer, M., Motz, S., van Riggelen, F., Sammak, A., de Snoo, S. L., Scappucci, G., & Veldhorst, M. (2024) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41565-023-01491-3 · Cited by 165
Quantum Computing in Civil Engineering: Potentials and Limitations
Ploennigs, J., Berger, M., Mevissen, M., & Smarsly, K. (2025) · Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-87364-5_2 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Chatterjee, A., Stevenson, P., De Franceschi, S., Morello, A., de Leon, N. P., & Kuemmeth, F.
- Venue
- Nature Reviews Physics
- Published
- 2021-02-19
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 157-177
- ISSN
- 2522-5820 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3024122711
- Cited by
- 359
- References
- 260
- FWCI
- 2.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Semiconductor qubits in practice. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s42254-021-00283-9
- The paper
- Chatterjee, A., Stevenson, P., De Franceschi, S., Morello, A., de Leon, N. P., & Kuemmeth, F. (2021). Semiconductor qubits in practice. Nature Reviews Physics. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42254-021-00283-9
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.