Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 300

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A very luminous magnetar-powered supernova associated with an ultra-long γ-ray burst

Open access
Greiner, Jochen, Mazzali, Paolo A., Kann, D. Alexander, Krühler, Thomas, Pian, Elena, Prentice, Simon, Olivares E., Felipe, Rossi, Andrea, Klose, Sylvio, Taubenberger, Stefan, Knust, Fabian, Afonso, Paulo M. J., Ashall, Chris, Bolmer, Jan, Delvaux, Corentin, Diehl, Roland, Elliott, Jonathan, Filgas, Robert, Fynbo, Johan P. U., Graham, John F., Guelbenzu, Ana Nicuesa, Kobayashi, Shiho, Leloudas, Giorgos, Savaglio, Sandra, Schady, Patricia, Schmidl, Sebastian, Schweyer, Tassilo, Sudilovsky, Vladimir, Tanga, Mohit, Updike, Adria C., van Eerten, Hendrik, Varela, Karla·2015·Nature

Abstract

A new class of ultra-long-duration (more than 10,000 seconds) γ-ray bursts has recently been suggested. They may originate in the explosion of stars with much larger radii than those producing normal long-duration γ-ray bursts or in the tidal disruption of a star. No clear supernova has yet been associated with an ultra-long-duration γ-ray burst. Here we report that a supernova (SN 2011kl) was associated with the ultra-long-duration γ-ray burst GRB 111209A, at a redshift z of 0.677. This supernova is more than three times more luminous than type Ic supernovae associated with long-duration γ-ray bursts, and its spectrum is distinctly different. The slope of the continuum resembles those of super-luminous supernovae, but extends further down into the rest-frame ultraviolet implying a low metal content. The light curve evolves much more rapidly than those of super-luminous supernovae. This combination of high luminosity and low metal-line opacity cannot be reconciled with typical type Ic supernovae, but can be reproduced by a model where extra energy is injected by a strongly magnetized neutron star (a magnetar), which has also been proposed as the explanation for super-luminous supernovae.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nature14579

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 30 references

Cited by

See all 300

Metadata

Authors
Greiner, J., Mazzali, P. A., Kann, D. A., Krühler, T., Pian, E., Prentice, S., Olivares E., F., Rossi, A., Klose, S., Taubenberger, S., Knust, F., Afonso, P. M. J., Ashall, C., Bolmer, J., Delvaux, C., Diehl, R., Elliott, J., Filgas, R., Fynbo, J. P. U., Graham, J. F., Guelbenzu, A. N., Kobayashi, S., Leloudas, G., Savaglio, S., Schady, P., Schmidl, S., Schweyer, T., Sudilovsky, V., Tanga, M., Updike, A. C., van Eerten, H., & Varela, K.
Venue
Nature
Published
2015-07
Volume
523
Issue
7559
Pages
189-192
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2114650648
Cited by
300
References
30
FWCI
27.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A very luminous magnetar-powered supernova associated with an ultra-long γ-ray burst. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/nature14579
The paper
Greiner, J., Mazzali, P. A., Kann, D. A., Krühler, T., Pian, E., Prentice, S., Olivares E., F., Rossi, A., Klose, S., Taubenberger, S., Knust, F., Afonso, P. M. J., Ashall, C., Bolmer, J., Delvaux, C., Diehl, R., Elliott, J., Filgas, R., Fynbo, J. P. U., . . . Varela, K. (2015). A very luminous magnetar-powered supernova associated with an ultra-long γ-ray burst. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14579

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.