Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 283

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 52 of the 52 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The mid-developmental transition and the evolution of animal body plans

Open access
Levin, Michal, Anavy, Leon, Cole, Alison G., Winter, Eitan, Mostov, Natalia, Khair, Sally, Senderovich, Naftalie, Kovalev, Ekaterina, Silver, David H., Feder, Martin, Fernandez-Valverde, Selene L., Nakanishi, Nagayasu, Simmons, David, Simakov, Oleg, Larsson, Tomas, Liu, Shang-Yun, Jerafi-Vider, Ayelet, Yaniv, Karina, Ryan, Joseph F., Martindale, Mark Q., Rink, Jochen C., Arendt, Detlev, Degnan, Sandie M., Degnan, Bernard M., Hashimshony, Tamar, Yanai, Itai·2016·Nature

Abstract

Animals are grouped into ~35 ‘phyla’ based upon the notion of distinct body plans. Morphological and molecular analyses have revealed that a stage in the middle of development—known as the phylotypic period—is conserved among species within some phyla. Although these analyses provide evidence for their existence, phyla have also been criticized as lacking an objective definition, and consequently based on arbitrary groupings of animals. Here we compare the developmental transcriptomes of ten species, each annotated to a different phylum, with a wide range of life histories and embryonic forms. We find that in all ten species, development comprises the coupling of early and late phases of conserved gene expression. These phases are linked by a divergent ‘mid-developmental transition’ that uses species-specific suites of signalling pathways and transcription factors. This mid-developmental transition overlaps with the phylotypic period that has been defined previously for three of the ten phyla, suggesting that transcriptional circuits and signalling mechanisms active during this transition are crucial for defining the phyletic body plan and that the mid-developmental transition may be used to define phylotypic periods in other phyla. Placing these observations alongside the reported conservation of mid-development within phyla, we propose that a phylum may be defined as a collection of species whose gene expression at the mid-developmental transition is both highly conserved among them, yet divergent relative to other species.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nature16994

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 52 references

Cited by

See all 283

Metadata

Authors
Levin, M., Anavy, L., Cole, A. G., Winter, E., Mostov, N., Khair, S., Senderovich, N., Kovalev, E., Silver, D. H., Feder, M., Fernandez-Valverde, S. L., Nakanishi, N., Simmons, D., Simakov, O., Larsson, T., Liu, S.-Y., Jerafi-Vider, A., Yaniv, K., Ryan, J. F., Martindale, M. Q., Rink, J. C., Arendt, D., Degnan, S. M., Degnan, B. M., Hashimshony, T., & Yanai, I.
Venue
Nature
Published
2016-02-17
Volume
531
Issue
7596
Pages
637-641
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2283570988
Cited by
283
References
52
FWCI
17.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The mid-developmental transition and the evolution of animal body plans. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/nature16994
The paper
Levin, M., Anavy, L., Cole, A. G., Winter, E., Mostov, N., Khair, S., Senderovich, N., Kovalev, E., Silver, D. H., Feder, M., Fernandez-Valverde, S. L., Nakanishi, N., Simmons, D., Simakov, O., Larsson, T., Liu, S.-Y., Jerafi-Vider, A., Yaniv, K., Ryan, J. F., . . . Yanai, I. (2016). The mid-developmental transition and the evolution of animal body plans. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature16994

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.