The DOI matches its Crossref record; 42 of the 42 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Thalamic amplification of cortical connectivity sustains attentional control
Open accessAbstract
Although interactions between the thalamus and cortex are critical for cognitive function, the exact contribution of the thalamus to these interactions remains unclear. Recent studies have shown diverse connectivity patterns across the thalamus, but whether this diversity translates to thalamic functions beyond relaying information to or between cortical regions is unknown. Here we show, by investigating the representation of two rules used to guide attention in the mouse prefrontal cortex (PFC), that the mediodorsal thalamus sustains these representations without relaying categorical information. Specifically, mediodorsal input amplifies local PFC connectivity, enabling rule-specific neural sequences to emerge and thereby maintain rule representations. Consistent with this notion, broadly enhancing PFC excitability diminishes rule specificity and behavioural performance, whereas enhancing mediodorsal excitability improves both. Overall, our results define a previously unknown principle in neuroscience; thalamic control of functional cortical connectivity. This function, which is dissociable from categorical information relay, indicates that the thalamus has a much broader role in cognition than previously thought.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Thalamic input amplifies PFC connectivity, sustaining attentional control 24 and enabling sensory selection in divided attention 25.”
From Mechanisms of synaptic transmission dysregulation in the prefrontal cortex: pathophysiological implications (2022) · cites this paper as [24]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Neocortical excitation/inhibition balance in information processing and social dysfunction
Yizhar, O., Fenno, L. E., Prigge, M., Schneider, F., Davidson, T. J., O’Shea, D. J., Sohal, V. S., Goshen, I., Finkelstein, J., Paz, J. T., et al. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10360 · Cited by 2,454
Context-dependent computation by recurrent dynamics in prefrontal cortex
Mante, V., Sussillo, D., Shenoy, K. V., & Newsome, W. T. (2013) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature12742 · Cited by 1,910
Anatomical analysis of afferent projections to the medial prefrontal cortex in the rat
Hoover, W. B., & Vertes, R. P. (2007) · Brain Structure and Function · doi:10.1007/s00429-007-0150-4 · Cited by 1,365
The MVGC multivariate Granger causality toolbox: A new approach to Granger-causal inference
Barnett, L., & Seth, A. K. (2013) · Journal of Neuroscience Methods · doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2013.10.018 · Cited by 1,038
The pulvinar regulates information transmission between cortical areas based on attention demands
Saalmann, Y. B., Pinsk, M. A., Wang, L., Li, X., & Kastner, S. (2012) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1223082 · Cited by 1,016
Choice-specific sequences in parietal cortex during a virtual-navigation decision task
Harvey, C. D., Coen, P., & Tank, D. W. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10918 · Cited by 951
Barthó, P., Hirase, H., Monconduit, L., Zugaro, M., Harris, K. D., & Buzsáki, G. (2004) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.01170.2003 · Cited by 912
Gamma and Beta Bursts Underlie Working Memory
Lundqvist, M., Rose, J., Herman, P., Brincat, S. L., Buschman, T. J., & Miller, E. K. (2016) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2016.02.028 · Cited by 846
Synfire Chains and Cortical Songs: Temporal Modules of Cortical Activity
Ikegaya, Y., Aaron, G., Cossart, R., Aronov, D., Lampl, I., Ferster, D., & Yuste, R. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1093173 · Cited by 838
Thalamus plays a central role in ongoing cortical functioning
Sherman, S. M. (2016) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.4269 · Cited by 809
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Duda, R. O ., Hart, P. E. & Stork, D. G. Pattern Classification Vol. 18 (Wiley, 2001)
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Single-trial neural dynamics are dominated by richly varied movements
Musall, S., Kaufman, M. T., Juavinett, A., Gluf, S., & Churchland, A. K. (2019) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-019-0502-4 · Cited by 1,102
Predictive Processing: A Canonical Cortical Computation
Keller, G. B., & Mrsic-Flogel, T. D. (2018) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2018.10.003 · Cited by 836
Miller, E. K., Lundqvist, M., & Bastos, A. M. (2018) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2018.09.023 · Cited by 797
Ferguson, B. R., & Gao, W.-J. (2018) · Frontiers in Neural Circuits · doi:10.3389/fncir.2018.00037 · Cited by 594
Thalamic projections sustain prefrontal activity during working memory maintenance
Bolkan, S. S., Stujenske, J. M., Parnaudeau, S., Spellman, T., Rauffenbart, C., Abbas, A. I., Harris, A. Z., Gordon, J. A., & Kellendonk, C. (2017) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.4568 · Cited by 547
Metadata
- Authors
- Schmitt, L. I., Wimmer, R. D., Nakajima, M., Happ, M., Mofakham, S., & Halassa, M. M.
- Affiliations
- NYU Langone Health (US)
- Corresponding author
- Halassa, Michael M.
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2017-05
- Volume
- 545
- Issue
- 7653
- Pages
- 219-223
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- PMC
- PMC5570520
- OpenAlex
- W2611485120
- Cited by
- 663
- References
- 42
- Citations by year
- 2026: 51 · 2025: 64 · 2024: 62 · 2023: 64 · 2022: 72 · 2021: 90 · 2020: 66 · 2019: 64 · 2018: 105 · 2017: 24
- FWCI
- 40.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Nature (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH107680)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Keywords
- mediodorsal thalamus, prefrontal cortex, cortical connectivity, attentional control, rule representation, thalamocortical interactions, neural sequences, persistent activity
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Attention, Cognition, Male, Neural Pathways, Thalamus, Prefrontal Cortex, Mice, Optogenetics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
