Cited by 382Pleistocene-Era Hominins and ArchaeologyPacific and Southeast Asian StudiesForensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies

An early modern human presence in Sumatra 73,000–63,000 years ago

Open access
Westaway, K. E., Louys, J., Awe, R. Due, Morwood, M. J., Price, G. J., Zhao, J.-x., Aubert, M., Joannes-Boyau, R. +15 more·2017·Nature

Abstract

Genetic evidence for anatomically modern humans (AMH) out of Africa before 75 thousand years ago (ka) and in island southeast Asia (ISEA) before 60 ka (93-61 ka) predates accepted archaeological records of occupation in the region. Claims that AMH arrived in ISEA before 60 ka (ref. 4) have been supported only by equivocal or non-skeletal evidence. AMH evidence from this period is rare and lacks robust chronologies owing to a lack of direct dating applications, poor preservation and/or excavation strategies and questionable taxonomic identifications. Lida Ajer is a Sumatran Pleistocene cave with a rich rainforest fauna associated with fossil human teeth. The importance of the site is unclear owing to unsupported taxonomic identification of these fossils and uncertainties regarding the age of the deposit, therefore it is rarely considered in models of human dispersal. Here we reinvestigate Lida Ajer to identify the teeth confidently and establish a robust chronology using an integrated dating approach. Using enamel-dentine junction morphology, enamel thickness and comparative morphology, we show that the teeth are unequivocally AMH. Luminescence and uranium-series techniques applied to bone-bearing sediments and speleothems, and coupled uranium-series and electron spin resonance dating of mammalian teeth, place modern humans in Sumatra between 73 and 63 ka. This age is consistent with biostratigraphic estimations, palaeoclimate and sea-level reconstructions, and genetic evidence for a pre-60 ka arrival of AMH into ISEA. Lida Ajer represents, to our knowledge, the earliest evidence of rainforest occupation by AMH, and underscores the importance of reassessing the timing and environmental context of the dispersal of modern humans out of Africa.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nature23452

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • At least two endemic 'super-archaic' hominin species, H. floresiensis and H. luzonensis, were present in Island Southeast Asia around the time anatomically modern humans arrived more than 50,000 years ago.

    “The hominin fossil record of Island Southeast Asia (ISEA) indicates that at least two endemic 'super-archaic' species Homo luzonensis and H. floresiensis - were present around the time anatomically modern humans (AMH) arrived in the region >50,000 years ago.”

    From Widespread Denisovan ancestry in Island Southeast Asia but no evidence of substantial super-archaic hominin admixture (2021) · cites this paper as [5]

    The paper’s discussion of the Lida Ajer chronology reports anatomically modern humans in Sumatra 73,000–63,000 years ago, supporting arrival in Island Southeast Asia more than 50,000 years ago. Its comparison of the teeth mentions H. floresiensis, but the paper does not establish that it was present at the same time, and the passages found do not mention H. luzonensis or describe two endemic ‘super-archaic’ species. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Part of this paper’s reference list could not be split into single entries.

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 67 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. Elias, S.A.) 3232-3249. (Elsevier, Oxford, 2007).
  2. Schwartz, J.H., Long, V.T., Cuong,N.L., Kha, L.T. Tattersall, I. A review of the Pleistocene hominoid fauna of the Socialist Republic of Vietnam (excluding Hylobatidae) Anthropology Papers of the American Museum of Natural History, 76, 1-24 (1995).
  3. de Vos, J. The Pongo faunas from Java and Sumatra and their significance for biostratigraphical and paleo-ecological interpretations. Proceedings of the Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen Series B 86, 417-425 (1983).
  4. Drawhorn, G. M. The Systematics and Paleodemography of Fossil Orangutans. (PhD Thesis, University of California) 1-232 (Davis, 1994).
  5. Barker, G. & Farr, L. (eds.) Archaeological investigations in the Niah Caves, Sarawak, 1954-2004.: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research ISBN 9781902937601 (McDonald Institute Monographs 2, Cambridge, 2016).
  6. Turner, C.G., Nichol, C.R. & Scott, G.R. Scoring procedures for key morphological traits of the permanent dentition: the Arizona State University dental anthropology system. In Advances in Dental Anthropology (ed. Kelly & Larsen) 13-31 (New York: Wiley-Liss, 1991).
  7. deVos, J., Long, Vu. In: Semah, F., et al., (Eds.) Origins of settlements and chronology of the Palaeolithic cultures in Southeast Asia, (Semenajung, Paris, 2001).
  8. Ciochon, R. L. & Larick, R. Dated co-occurrence of Homo erectus and Gigantopithecus from Tham Khuyen Cave, Vietnam. P. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 93, 3016 (1996).
  9. Cuong, N.L. Fossile Menschenfunde aus Nordvietnam. In: Herrmann, J., and Ullrich, H., (Eds.) Menschwerdung -Biotischer und Gesellschafrlicher Entwicklungs -(Prozess. Akademie Verlag, Berlin, 1985).
  10. de Vos, J., 2007. Mid-Pleistocene of Southern Asia, In: Elias, S.A. (Ed.), The Encyclopedia of Quaternary Science (Elsevier, Oxford, 2007).
  11. de Vos, J., 1983. The Pongo faunas from Java and Sumatra and their significance for biostratigraphical and paleo-ecological interpretations. Proceedings of the Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen Series B 86, 417-425.
  12. Duringer, P., Bacon, A.-M., Sayavongkhamdyc, T., & Nguyen Thi Kim Thuy. Karst development, breccias history, and mammalian assemblages in Southeast Asia: A brief review. Comptes Rendus Palevol 11, 133-137 (2012).
  13. Wu, X. & Zhang, Z. Homo sapiens remains from Late Palaeolithic and Neolithic China. (In Wu, R. & Olsen, J. W. Palaeoanthropology and Palaeolithic Archaeology in the People's Republic of China) 107-133 (Academic Press, London, 1985).
  14. Black, G.V. Descriptive anatomy of the human teeth. (Fifth Edition. SS White Dental Manufacturing Company. Philadelphia, 1902).
  15. Jianing, H., 2000. Preliminary study on the teeth of Jinniushan archaic Homo sapiens. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 3, 006 (2000).
  16. Wu, X. & Poirier, F.E. Human evolution in China: a metric description of the fossils and a review of the sites. Oxford University Press, USA (1995).
  17. Williams, J.L. A new classification of human tooth forms; with special reference to a new system of artificial teeth. Dental Digest XX, 63-67 (1914). 100. Zaim, Y., Ciochon, R.L., Polanski, J.M., Grine, F.E., Bettis, E.A., Rizal, Y., Franciscus, R.G., Larick, R.R., Heizler, M., Eaves, K.L. & Marsh, H.E. New 1.5 million-year-old Homo erectus maxilla from Sangiran (Central Java, Indonesia). J. Hum. Evol. Evolution 61, 363-376 (2011). 101. Alqahtani, S.J., Hector, M.P. & Liversidge, H.M. Brief communication: the London atlas of human tooth development and eruption. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 142, 481-490 (2010). 102. Hillson, S., 1996. Dental anthropology (Cambridge University Press 1996). 103. Xing, S., Martinón-Torres, M., Bermúdez de Castro, J.M., Wu, X. & Liu, W. Hominin teeth from the early Late Pleistocene site of Xujiayao, Northern China. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 156, 224-240 (2015). 104. Brace, C.L. & Vitzthum, V. Human tooth size at Mesolithic, Neolithic and modern levels at Niah Cave, Sarawak: comparisons with other Asian populations. (The) Museum Journal Kuching (Sarawak) 33, 75-82 (1984). 105. Jacob, T. Studies on human variation in Indonesia. Journal of the National Medical Association 66, 389 (1974). 106. Sarasin, P. Neue lithochrone Funde im Innern von Sumatra. Verh. naturf. Ges. Basel 25, 97-111 (1914). 107. Xing, S., Sun, C., Martinón-Torres, M., de Castro, J.M.B., Han, F., Zhang, Y. & Liu, W. Hominin teeth from the Middle Pleistocene site of Yiyuan, Eastern China. J. Hum. Evol. 95, 33-54 (2016). 108. Xing, S., Martinón-Torres, M., de Castro, J.M.B., Zhang, Y., Fan, X., Zheng, L., Huang, W. & Liu, W. Middle Pleistocene hominin teeth from Longtan Cave, Hexian, China. PloS one 9, e114265 (2014). 109. Liu, W., Schepartz, L.A., Xing, S., Miller-Antonio, S., Wu, X., Trinkaus, E. & Martinón-Torres, M. Late middle Pleistocene hominin teeth from Panxian Dadong, South China. J. Hum. Evol. 64, 337-355 (2013). 110. Bailey, S.E. The evolution of non-metric dental variation in Europe. Mitteilungen der Gesellschaft für Urgeschichte 15, 9-30 (2006). 111. Liu, W., Wu, X., Pei, S., Wu, X. & Norton, C.J. Huanglong Cave: a late Pleistocene human fossil site in Hubei Province, China. Quatern. Int. 211, 29-41 (2010). 112. Bermúdez de Castro, J. M., Rosas, A. & Nicolás, M.E. Dental remains from Atapuerca-TD6 (Gran Dolina site, Burgos, Spain). J. Hum. Evol. 37, 523-566 (1999). 113. Irish, J.D. & Guatelli-Steinberg, D. Ancient teeth and modern human origins: an expanded comparison of African Plio-Pleistocene and recent world dental samples. J. Hum. Evol. 45, 113-144 (2003). 114. Irish, J.D. Ancestral dental traits in recent Sub-Saharan Africans and the origins of modern humans. J. Hum. Evol. 34, 81-98 (1998). 115. Scott, G.R. & Turner II, C.G. The Anthropology of Modern Human Teeth: Dental Morphology and its Variation in Recent Human Populations. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge, England (1997). 116.
  18. Millard, A.R. & Hedges, R.E.M. A diffusion-adsorption model of uranium uptake by archaeological bone. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 60, 2139-2152 (1996). 148. Pike, A.W.G. Uranium Series Dating of Archaeological Bone by Thermal Ionization Mass Spectrometry (D.Phil. thesis, University of Oxford, 2000). 149. Pike, A.W.G., Hedges, R.E.M. & Van Calsteren, P. U-series dating of bone using the diffusion- adsorption model. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 66, 4273-4286 (2002). 150. Sambridge, M., Grün, R. & Eggins, S. U-series dating of bone in an open system: the diffusion- adsorption-decay model. Quat. Geochronol. 9, 42-53 (2012). 151. Grün, R. & McDermott, F. 1994. Open system modelling for U-series and ESR dating of teeth. Quat. Geochronol. 13, 121-125 (1994).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Westaway, K. E., Louys, J., Awe, R. D., Morwood, M. J., Price, G. J., Zhao, J.-X., Aubert, M., Joannes-Boyau, R., Smith, T. M., Skinner, M. M., Compton, T., Bailey, R. M., van den Bergh, G. D., de Vos, J., Pike, A. W. G., Stringer, C., Saptomo, E. W., Rizal, Y., Zaim, J., Santoso, W. D., Trihascaryo, A., Kinsley, L., & Sulistyanto, B.
Affiliations
  • Macquarie University (AU)
  • Australian National University (AU)
  • Pusat Penelitian Arkeologi Nasional (ID)
  • University of Wollongong (AU)
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
  • Griffith University (AU)
  • Southern Cross University (AU)
  • University of Kent (GB)
  • Natural History Museum (GB)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • University of Southampton (GB)
  • Bandung Institute of Technology (ID)
Corresponding author
Westaway, K. E.
Venue
Nature
Published
2017-08
Volume
548
Issue
7667
Pages
322-325
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2742580921
Cited by
382
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 55 · 2024: 87 · 2023: 45 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 40 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 10
FWCI
127.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (acceptedVersion)
  • Kent Academic Repository (University of Kent) (submittedVersion)
  • Digital Commons - University of South Florida (University of South Florida) (submittedVersion)
  • Cross Connect (Southern Cross University) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Online (University of Wollongong) (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion)
  • ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
  • Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Leaky Foundation
  • Max-Planck-Gesellschaft
  • Naturalis Biodiversity Center
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
  • Social Sciences › Geography, Planning and Development › Pacific and Southeast Asian Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies
Keywords
Sumatra, human, human dispersal, Toba eruption, enamel thickness, luminescence dating, uranium-series dating, electron spin resonance dating, mammalian dentition, speleothems, Pleistocene sea-level lowstand, biostratigraphy
MeSH terms
Electron Spin Resonance Spectroscopy, Fossils, Humans, Indonesia, Tooth, Uranium, Luminescence, History, Ancient, Caves, Human Migration, Rainforest

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review