Cited by 258Pleistocene-Era Hominins and ArchaeologyEvolution and Paleontology StudiesPacific and Southeast Asian Studies

A new species of Homo from the Late Pleistocene of the Philippines

Open access
Détroit, Florent, Mijares, Armand Salvador, Corny, Julien, Daver, Guillaume, Zanolli, Clément, Dizon, Eusebio, Robles, Emil, Grün, Rainer +1 more·2019·Nature

Abstract

A hominin third metatarsal discovered in 2007 in Callao Cave (Northern Luzon, the Philippines) and dated to 67 thousand years ago provided the earliest direct evidence of a human presence in the Philippines. Analysis of this foot bone suggested that it belonged to the genus Homo, but to which species was unclear. Here we report the discovery of twelve additional hominin elements that represent at least three individuals that were found in the same stratigraphic layer of Callao Cave as the previously discovered metatarsal. These specimens display a combination of primitive and derived morphological features that is different from the combination of features found in other species in the genus Homo (including Homo floresiensis and Homo sapiens) and warrants their attribution to a new species, which we name Homo luzonensis. The presence of another and previously unknown hominin species east of the Wallace Line during the Late Pleistocene epoch underscores the importance of island Southeast Asia in the evolution of the genus Homo.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41586-019-1067-9

Cites

74 of 74 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 75 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Détroit, F., Mijares, A. S., Corny, J., Daver, G., Zanolli, C., Dizon, E., Robles, E., Grün, R., & Piper, P. J.
Affiliations
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • University of the Philippines System (PH)
  • National Museum of the Philippines (PH)
  • Griffith University (AU)
  • Australian National University (AU)
Corresponding author
  • Détroit, Florent
  • Mijares, Armand Salvador
Venue
Nature
Published
2019-04-10
Volume
568
Issue
7751
Pages
181-186
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2938961075
Cited by
230
References
75
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 48 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 2 · 2014: 1
FWCI
183.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion)
  • Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
  • The Catalogue of Life
Funders
Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-10-LABX-0052)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Geography, Planning and Development › Pacific and Southeast Asian Studies
Keywords
Homo luzonensis, Luzon, Late Pleistocene, hominin skeletal remains, foot morphology, Homo floresiensis, Wallace's Line, hominin evolution, Island Southeast Asia
MeSH terms
Animals, Classification, Biological Evolution, Fossils, Metatarsal Bones, Philippines, Species Specificity, Hominidae, Caves

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review