Cited by 392Pluripotent Stem Cells ResearchCRISPR and Genetic EngineeringDevelopmental Biology and Gene Regulation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 52 of the 52 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Genome editing reveals a role for OCT4 in human embryogenesis

Open access

Abstract

Despite their fundamental biological and clinical importance, the molecular mechanisms that regulate the first cell fate decisions in the human embryo are not well understood. Here we use CRISPR-Cas9-mediated genome editing to investigate the function of the pluripotency transcription factor OCT4 during human embryogenesis. We identified an efficient OCT4-targeting guide RNA using an inducible human embryonic stem cell-based system and microinjection of mouse zygotes. Using these refined methods, we efficiently and specifically targeted the gene encoding OCT4 (POU5F1) in diploid human zygotes and found that blastocyst development was compromised. Transcriptomics analysis revealed that, in POU5F1-null cells, gene expression was downregulated not only for extra-embryonic trophectoderm genes, such as CDX2, but also for regulators of the pluripotent epiblast, including NANOG. By contrast, Pou5f1-null mouse embryos maintained the expression of orthologous genes, and blastocyst development was established, but maintenance was compromised. We conclude that CRISPR-Cas9-mediated genome editing is a powerful method for investigating gene function in the context of human development.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nature24033

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 51 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–300 of 385

Metadata

Authors
Fogarty, N. M. E., McCarthy, A., Snijders, K. E., Powell, B. E., Kubikova, N., Blakeley, P., Lea, R., Elder, K., Wamaitha, S. E., Kim, D., Maciulyte, V., Kleinjung, J., Kim, J.-S., Wells, D., Vallier, L., Bertero, A., Turner, J. M. A., & Niakan, K. K.
Affiliations
  • The Francis Crick Institute (GB)
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • John Radcliffe Hospital (GB)
  • Bourn Hall Clinic (GB)
  • Seoul National University (KR)
  • Wellcome/MRC Cambridge Stem Cell Institute (GB)
Corresponding author
Niakan, Kathy K.
Venue
Nature
Published
2017-09-20
Volume
550
Issue
7674
Pages
67-73
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2759601393
Cited by
392
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 45 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 50 · 2020: 50 · 2019: 62 · 2018: 62 · 2017: 13
FWCI
20.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Update notices
erratum (2017-10-04)
Open access
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Institutional Research Information System University of Turin (University of Turin) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Seoul National University Open Repository (Seoul National University) (submittedVersion)
  • Apollo
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust (FC001193, FC001120)
  • Francis Crick Institute (10120, 10002, FC001193, 10193, FC001120)
  • Cancer Research UK (FC001120, FC001193)
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research
  • British Heart Foundation (FS/11/77/39327)
  • University of Oxford
  • Institute for Basic Science (IBSR021-D1, R021-D1)
  • Medical Research Council (PSAG028, FC001193, MC_PC_12009, FC001120)
  • Clarendon Fund
  • NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Pluripotent Stem Cells Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
Keywords
Oct4, human embryonic development, blastocyst development, pluripotency transcription factors, trophectoderm, Nanog, epiblast, CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing, human zygotes, guide RNA design, placental development
MeSH terms
Human Embryonic Stem Cells, Nanog Homeobox Protein, Gene Editing, Animals, Blastocyst, Ectoderm, Embryo, Mammalian, Female, Germ Layers, Humans, Male, Substrate Specificity, Zygote, Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental, Cell Lineage, Embryonic Development, Octamer Transcription Factor-3, Mice, CRISPR-Cas Systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review