The DOI matches its Crossref record; 49 of the 50 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Observation of a many-body dynamical phase transition with a 53-qubit quantum simulator
Open accessAbstract
A quantum simulator is a type of quantum computer that controls the interactions between quantum bits (or qubits) in a way that can be mapped to certain quantum many-body problems. As it becomes possible to exert more control over larger numbers of qubits, such simulators will be able to tackle a wider range of problems, such as materials design and molecular modelling, with the ultimate limit being a universal quantum computer that can solve general classes of hard problems. Here we use a quantum simulator composed of up to 53 qubits to study non-equilibrium dynamics in the transverse-field Ising model with long-range interactions. We observe a dynamical phase transition after a sudden change of the Hamiltonian, in a regime in which conventional statistical mechanics does not apply. The qubits are represented by the spins of trapped ions, which can be prepared in various initial pure states. We apply a global long-range Ising interaction with controllable strength and range, and measure each individual qubit with an efficiency of nearly 99 per cent. Such high efficiency means that arbitrary many-body correlations between qubits can be measured in a single shot, enabling the dynamical phase transition to be probed directly and revealing computationally intractable features that rely on the long-range interactions and high connectivity between qubits.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Analog quantum simulators have been getting notably more sophisticated, and are already being employed to study quantum dynamics in regimes which may be beyond the reach of classical simulators [51, 52].”
From Quantum Computing in the NISQ era and beyond (2018) · cites this paper as [52]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Quantum Computation and Quantum Information
Nielsen, M. A., Chuang, I., & Grover, L. K. (2002) · American Journal of Physics · doi:10.1119/1.1463744 · Cited by 21,895
Quantum Computation and Quantum Information: 10th Anniversary Edition
Nielsen, M. A., & Chuang, I. L. (2012) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511976667 · Cited by 8,436
Simulating physics with computers
Feynman, R. P. (1982) · International Journal of Theoretical Physics · doi:10.1007/bf02650179 · Cited by 7,691
Subir Sachdev, A. (2000) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511622540 · Cited by 3,675
Hardware-efficient variational quantum eigensolver for small molecules and quantum magnets
Kandala, A., Mezzacapo, A., Temme, K., Takita, M., Brink, M., Chow, J. M., & Gambetta, J. M. (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature23879 · Cited by 2,982
Georgescu, I. M., Ashhab, S., & Nori, F. (2014) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.86.153 · Cited by 2,932
Probing many-body dynamics on a 51-atom quantum simulator
Bernien, H., Schwartz, S., Keesling, A., Levine, H., Omran, A., Pichler, H., Choi, S., Zibrov, A. S., Endres, M., Greiner, M., et al. (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature24622 · Cited by 2,460
Experimental issues in coherent quantum-state manipulation of trapped atomic ions
Wineland, D. J., Monroe, C., Itano, W. M., Leibfried, D., King, B. E., & Meekhof, D. M. (1998) · Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology · doi:10.6028/jres.103.019 · Cited by 1,497
Self-citationOn the computational complexity of Ising spin glass models
Barahona, F. (1982) · Journal of Physics A Mathematical and General · doi:10.1088/0305-4470/15/10/028 · Cited by 1,303
Quantum many-body systems out of equilibrium
Eisert, J., Friesdorf, M., & Gogolin, C. (2015) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/nphys3215 · Cited by 1,255
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–300 of 1,003
Dynamical quantum phase transitions in systems with continuous symmetry breaking
Weidinger, S. A., Heyl, M., Silva, A., & Knap, M. (2017) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.96.134313 · Cited by 67
Out-of-equilibrium phase diagram of long-range superconductors
Uhrich, P., Defenu, N., Jafari, R., & Halimeh, J. C. (2020) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.101.245148 · Cited by 61
Mueller, N., Carolan, J., Connelly, A., Davoudi, Z., Dumitrescu, E., & Aydeniz, K. Y. (2023) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/prxquantum.4.030323 · Cited by 83
Prominent quantum many-body scars in a truncated Schwinger model
Desaules, J.-Y., Hudomal, A., Banerjee, D., Sen, A., Papić, Z., & Halimeh, J. C. (2023) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.107.205112 · Cited by 75
Quantifying entanglement in a 68-billion-dimensional quantum state space
Schneeloch, J., Tison, C. C., Fanto, M. L., Alsing, P. M., & Howland, G. A. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-10810-z · Cited by 62
Split-ring polariton condensates as macroscopic two-level quantum systems
Xue, Y., Chestnov, I. Y., Sedov, E., Kiktenko, E. O., Fedorov, A. K., Schumacher, S., Ma, X., & Kavokin, A. V. (2021) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.3.013099 · Cited by 59
Experimental estimation of the quantum Fisher information from randomized measurements
Yu, M., Li, D., Wang, J., Chu, Y., Yang, P., Gong, M., Goldman, N., & Cai, J. (2021) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.3.043122 · Cited by 62
Circuit complexity across a topological phase transition
Liu, F., Whitsitt, S., Curtis, J. B., Lundgren, R., Titum, P., Yang, Z.-C., Garrison, J. R., & Gorshkov, A. V. (2020) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.2.013323 · Cited by 58
Self-citationCoherent Scattering of Low Mass Dark Matter from Optically Trapped Sensors
Afek, G., Carney, D., & Moore, D. C. (2022) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.128.101301 · Cited by 70
Quantum Approximate Optimization With Parallelizable Gates
Lechner, W. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Quantum Engineering · doi:10.1109/tqe.2020.3034798 · Cited by 57
“INTRODUCTION With the immense recent developments in quantum technology [1]–[12] the regime of computational quantum advantage is in reach [13]–[15].”
BackgroundEnergy storage and coherence in closed and open quantum batteries
Caravelli, F., Yan, B., García-Pintos, L. P., & Hamma, A. (2021) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2021-07-15-505 · Cited by 63
Symmetries and conserved quantities of boundary time crystals in generalized spin models
Piccitto, G., Wauters, M. M., Nori, F., & Shammah, N. (2021) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.104.014307 · Cited by 57
Entanglement and many-body effects in collective neutrino oscillations
Roggero, A. (2021) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.104.103016 · Cited by 56
Maximum Entropy Principle in Deep Thermalization and in Hilbert-Space Ergodicity
Mark, D. K., Surace, F. M., Elben, A., Shaw, A. L., Choi, J., Refael, G., Endres, M., & Choi, S. (2024) · Physical Review X · doi:10.1103/physrevx.14.041051 · Cited by 74
Eigenstate correlations around the many-body localization transition
Tikhonov, K. S., & Mirlin, A. D. (2021) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.103.064204 · Cited by 57
Anomalous transport through algebraically localized states in one dimension
Saha, M., Maiti, S. K., & Purkayastha, A. (2019) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.100.174201 · Cited by 57
Limitations of Linear Cross-Entropy as a Measure for Quantum Advantage
Gao, X., Kalinowski, M., Chou, C.-N., Lukin, M. D., Barak, B., & Choi, S. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2112.01657 · Cited by 54
Critical quantum metrology with fully-connected models: from Heisenberg to Kibble–Zurek scaling
Garbe, L., Abah, O., Felicetti, S., & Puebla, R. (2022) · Quantum Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/2058-9565/ac6ca5 · Cited by 62
Shaping the Future of the Application of Quantum Computing in Intelligent Transportation System
Wang, S., Pei, Z., Wang, C., & Wu, J. (2021) · Intelligent and Converged Networks · doi:10.23919/icn.2021.0019 · Cited by 57
Hamiltonian engineering of spin-orbit–coupled fermions in a Wannier-Stark optical lattice clock
Aeppli, A., Chu, A., Bothwell, T., Kennedy, C. J., Kedar, D., He, P., Rey, A. M., & Ye, J. (2022) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.adc9242 · Cited by 56
Probing Ground-State Phase Transitions through Quench Dynamics
Titum, P., Iosue, J. T., Garrison, J. R., Gorshkov, A. V., & Gong, Z. (2019) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.123.115701 · Cited by 56
Self-citationUnsupervised Machine Learning of Quantum Phase Transitions Using Diffusion Maps
Lidiak, A., & Gong, Z. (2020) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.125.225701 · Cited by 57
Self-citationMany-body quantum thermal machines
Mukherjee, V., & Divakaran, U. (2021) · Journal of Physics Condensed Matter · doi:10.1088/1361-648x/ac1b60 · Cited by 55
Kiesenhofer, D., Hainzer, H., Zhdanov, A., Holz, P. C., Bock, M., Ollikainen, T., & Roos, C. F. (2023) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/prxquantum.4.020317 · Cited by 53
Provable compressed sensing quantum state tomography via non-convex methods
Kyrillidis, A., Kalev, A., Park, D., Bhojanapalli, S., Caramanis, C., & Sanghavi, S. (2018) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-018-0080-4 · Cited by 53
Universal finite-time thermodynamics of many-body quantum machines from Kibble-Zurek scaling
Revathy, B. S., Mukherjee, V., Divakaran, U., & del Campo, A. (2020) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.2.043247 · Cited by 53
A universal programmable Gaussian boson sampler for drug discovery
Yu, S., Zhong, Z., Fang, Y., Patel, R. B., Li, Q., Liu, W., Li, Z., Xu, L., Sagona-Stophel, S., Mer, E., et al. (2023) · Nature Computational Science · doi:10.1038/s43588-023-00526-y · Cited by 60
Continuous symmetry breaking in a trapped-ion spin chain
Feng, L., Katz, O., Haack, C., Maghrebi, M. F., Gorshkov, A. V., Gong, Z., Cetina, M., & Monroe, C. R. (2023) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06656-7 · Cited by 52
Self-citationTheory of robust multiqubit nonadiabatic gates for trapped ions
Shapira, Y., Shaniv, R., Manovitz, T., Akerman, N., Peleg, L., Gazit, L., Ozeri, R., & Stern, A. (2020) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.101.032330 · Cited by 54
Huybrechts, D., Minganti, F., Nori, F., Wouters, M., & Shammah, N. (2020) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.101.214302 · Cited by 52
Qubit Regularization of Asymptotic Freedom
Tanmoy Bhattacharya, A., Buser, A. J., Shailesh Chandrasekharan, A., Gupta, R., & Singh, H. (2021) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.126.172001 · Cited by 52
Floquet dynamical quantum phase transitions under synchronized periodic driving
Jafari, R., Akbari, A., Mishra, U., & Johannesson, H. (2022) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.105.094311 · Cited by 51
Quantum Simulation of Dissipative Collective Effects on Noisy Quantum Computers
Cattaneo, M., Rossi, M. A. C., García-Pérez, G., Zambrini, R., & Maniscalco, S. (2023) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/prxquantum.4.010324 · Cited by 54
Absence of Fast Scrambling in Thermodynamically Stable Long-Range Interacting Systems
Kuwahara, T., & Saito, K. (2021) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.126.030604 · Cited by 59
Exceptional dynamical quantum phase transitions in periodically driven systems
Hamazaki, R. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-25355-3 · Cited by 51
Cotler, J. S., Choi, S., Lukin, A., Gharibyan, H., Grover, T., Tai, M. E., Rispoli, M., Schittko, R., Preiss, P. M., Kaufman, A. M., et al. (2019) · Physical Review X · doi:10.1103/physrevx.9.031013 · Cited by 61
Nonlocal emergent hydrodynamics in a long-range quantum spin system
Schuckert, A., Lovas, I., & Knap, M. (2020) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.101.020416 · Cited by 50
Noncommuting conserved charges in quantum many-body thermalization
Halpern, N. Y., Beverland, M. E., & Kalev, A. (2020) · Physical review. E · doi:10.1103/physreve.101.042117 · Cited by 58
Quantum-enhanced finite-time Otto cycle
Das, A., & Mukherjee, V. (2020) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.2.033083 · Cited by 50
Classically verifiable quantum advantage from a computational Bell test
Kahanamoku–Meyer, G. D., Choi, S., Vazirani, U. V., & Yao, N. Y. (2022) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/s41567-022-01643-7 · Cited by 62
Efficient realization of quantum algorithms with qudits
Nikolaeva, A. S., Kiktenko, E. O., & Fedorov, A. K. (2024) · EPJ Quantum Technology · doi:10.1140/epjqt/s40507-024-00250-0 · Cited by 64
Floquet Quantum Simulation with Superconducting Qubits
Kyriienko, O., & Sørensen, A. S. (2018) · Physical Review Applied · doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.9.064029 · Cited by 48
Quantum Kibble-Zurek physics in long-range transverse-field Ising models
Puebla, R., Marty, O., & Plenio, M. B. (2019) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.100.032115 · Cited by 51
Observation of dynamical quantum phase transitions in a spinor condensate
Yang, H.-X., Tian, T., Yang, Y.-B., Qiu, L.-Y., Liang, H., Chu, A., Dağ, C. B., Xu, Y., Liu, Y., & Duan, L. (2019) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.100.013622 · Cited by 48
Simulating Nonlinear Dynamics of Collective Spins via Quantum Measurement and Feedback
Muñoz-Arias, M. H., Poggi, P. M., Jessen, P., & Deutsch, I. (2020) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.124.110503 · Cited by 51
Universal Anti-Kibble-Zurek Scaling in Fully Connected Systems
Puebla, R., Smirne, A., Huelga, S. F., & Plenio, M. B. (2020) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.124.230602 · Cited by 48
Non-Hermitian topological phases and dynamical quantum phase transitions: a generic connection
Zhou, L., & Du, Q. (2021) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/ac0574 · Cited by 47
Long-Range Multibody Interactions and Three-Body Antiblockade in a Trapped Rydberg Ion Chain
Gambetta, F. M., Zhang, C., Hennrich, M., Lesanovsky, I., & Li, W. (2020) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.125.133602 · Cited by 48
Dynamical evolution in a one-dimensional incommensurate lattice with PT symmetry
Xu, Z., & Chen, S. (2021) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.103.043325 · Cited by 47
Realizing quantum gates with optically addressable Yb + 171 ion qudits
Aksenov, M. A., Zalivako, I. V., Semerikov, I. A., Borisenko, A. S., Semenin, N. V., Sidorov, P., Fedorov, A. K., Khabarova, K. Y., & Kolachevsky, N. (2023) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.107.052612 · Cited by 51
Channeling Quantum Criticality
Zou, Y., Sang, S., & Hsieh, T. H. (2023) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.130.250403 · Cited by 55
Optical Trapping of Ion Coulomb Crystals
Schmidt, J., Lambrecht, A., Weckesser, P., Debatin, M., Karpa, L., & Schaetz, T. (2018) · Physical Review X · doi:10.1103/physrevx.8.021028 · Cited by 49
Autonomous Tuning and Charge-State Detection of Gate-Defined Quantum Dots
Darulová, J., Pauka, S., Wiebe, N., Chan, K. W., Gardener, G. C., Manfra, M. J., Cassidy, M. C., & Troyer, M. (2020) · Physical Review Applied · doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.13.054005 · Cited by 46
Initialization of quantum simulators by sympathetic cooling
Raghunandan, M., Wolf, F., Ospelkaus, C., Schmidt, P. O., & Weimer, H. (2020) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.aaw9268 · Cited by 46
Local measures of dynamical quantum phase transitions
Halimeh, J. C., Trapin, D., Damme, M. V., & Heyl, M. (2021) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.104.075130 · Cited by 48
Observing Dynamical Quantum Phase Transitions through Quasilocal String Operators
Bandyopadhyay, S. K., Polkovnikov, A., & Dutta, A. (2021) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.126.200602 · Cited by 46
Quantum circuits for maximally entangled states
Cervera-Lierta, A., Latorre, J. I., & Goyeneche, D. (2019) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.100.022342 · Cited by 46
Dynamical quantum phase transitions in Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev Lindbladians
Kawabata, K., Kulkarni, A., Li, J., Numasawa, T., & Ryu, S. (2023) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.108.075110 · Cited by 45
Biorthogonal Dynamical Quantum Phase Transitions in Non-Hermitian Systems
Jing, Y., Dong, J., Zhang, Y., & Hu, Z.-X. (2024) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.132.220402 · Cited by 45
Entangling an arbitrary pair of qubits in a long ion crystal
Leung, P. H., & Brown, K. R. (2018) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.98.032318 · Cited by 47
Chen, B., Hou, X., Zhou, F., Qian, P., Shen, H., & Xu, N. (2020) · Applied Physics Letters · doi:10.1063/5.0004152 · Cited by 45
Stand-alone vacuum cell for compact ultracold quantum technologies
Burrow, O. S., Osborn, P. F., Boughton, E., Mirando, F., Burt, D. P., Griffin, P. F., Arnold, A. S., & Riis, E. (2021) · Applied Physics Letters · doi:10.1063/5.0061010 · Cited by 47
Robust and Efficient Hamiltonian Learning
Yu, W., Sun, J., Han, Z., & Yuan, X. (2023) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2023-06-29-1045 · Cited by 44
Benchmarking Quantum Simulators Using Ergodic Quantum Dynamics
Mark, D. K., Choi, J., Shaw, A. L., Endres, M., & Choi, S. (2023) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.131.110601 · Cited by 52
Universal Dynamics of Inhomogeneous Quantum Phase Transitions: Suppressing Defect Formation
Gómez-Ruiz, F. J., & del Campo, A. (2019) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.122.080604 · Cited by 44
Prethermal quantum many-body Kapitza phases of periodically driven spin systems
Lerose, A., Marino, J., Gambassi, A., & Silva, A. (2019) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.100.104306 · Cited by 57
Learning Temporal Quantum Tomography
Tran, Q. H., & Nakajima, K. (2021) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.127.260401 · Cited by 47
Collectively Encoded Rydberg Qubit
Spong, N. L. R., Jiao, Y., Hughes, O. D. W., Weatherill, K. J., Lesanovsky, I., & Adams, C. S. (2021) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.127.063604 · Cited by 45
Full Counting Statistics of Charge in Chaotic Many-Body Quantum Systems
McCulloch, E., Nardis, J. D., Gopalakrishnan, S., & Vasseur, R. (2023) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.131.210402 · Cited by 43
Tangpanitanon, J., Thanasilp, S., Dangniam, N., Lemonde, M.-A., & Angelakis, D. G. (2020) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.2.043364 · Cited by 50
Prospects for simulating a qudit-based model of ( 1 + 1 ) D scalar QED
Gustafson, E. (2021) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.103.114505 · Cited by 43
The Ising critical quantum Otto engine
Piccitto, G., Campisi, M., & Rossini, D. (2022) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/ac963b · Cited by 42
Realization of an Extremely Anisotropic Heisenberg Magnet in Rydberg Atom Arrays
Kim, K., Yang, F., Mølmer, K., & Ahn, J. (2024) · Physical Review X · doi:10.1103/physrevx.14.011025 · Cited by 48
Dynamical phase diagram of a quantum Ising chain with long-range interactions
Piccitto, G., Žunkovič, B., & Silva, A. (2019) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.100.180402 · Cited by 42
Spreading of correlations and entanglement in the long-range transverse Ising chain
Schneider, J. T., Despres, J., Thomson, S. J., Tagliacozzo, L., & Sanchez-Palencia, L. (2021) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.3.l012022 · Cited by 45
Engineering Dynamically Decoupled Quantum Simulations with Trapped Ions
Morong, W., Collins, K. S., De, A., Stavropoulos, E., You, T., & Monroe, C. R. (2023) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/prxquantum.4.010334 · Cited by 42
Self-citationProgrammable Quantum Simulations of Bosonic Systems with Trapped Ions
Katz, O., & Monroe, C. R. (2023) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.131.033604 · Cited by 47
Self-citationLi, B.-W., Wu, Y., Mei, Q.-X., Yao, R., Lian, W., Cai, M.-L., Wang, Y., Qi, B., Yao, L., He, L., et al. (2023) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/prxquantum.4.010302 · Cited by 41
Nam, Y., & Maslov, D. A. (2019) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-019-0152-0 · Cited by 46
Quantum Speedup for Aeroscience and Engineering
Givi, P., Daley, A. J., Mavriplis, D. J., & Malik, M. R. (2020) · AIAA Journal · doi:10.2514/1.j059183 · Cited by 46
Parallel time-dependent variational principle algorithm for matrix product states
Secular, P., Gourianov, N., Lubasch, M., Dolgov, S., Clark, S. R., & Jaksch, D. (2020) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.101.235123 · Cited by 40
Decondensation in Nonequilibrium Photonic Condensates: When Less Is More
Hesten, H. J., Nyman, R. A., & Mintert, F. (2018) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.120.040601 · Cited by 41
Ultrafast variational simulation of nontrivial quantum states with long-range interactions
Ho, W. W., Jonay, C., & Hsieh, T. H. (2019) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.99.052332 · Cited by 46
Finite-component dynamical quantum phase transitions
Puebla, R. (2020) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.102.220302 · Cited by 40
Peotta, S., Brange, F., Deger, A., Ojanen, T., & Flindt, C. (2021) · Physical Review X · doi:10.1103/physrevx.11.041018 · Cited by 40
Quantum computation and simulation with vibrational modes of trapped ions
Chen, W., Gan, J., Zhang, J.-N., Matsukevich, D., & Kim, K. (2021) · Chinese Physics B · doi:10.1088/1674-1056/ac01e3 · Cited by 48
Self-citationRecent advances in high-dimensional quantum frequency combs
Chang, K.-C., Cheng, X., Sarihan, M. C., & Wong, C. W. (2025) · Newton · doi:10.1016/j.newton.2025.100024 · Cited by 46
Dynamical quantum phase transition for mixed states in open systems
Lang, H., Chen, Y.-X., Hong, Q., & Fan, H. (2018) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.98.134310 · Cited by 40
Dynamical quantum phase transitions and non-Markovian dynamics
Kyaw, T. H., Bastidas, V. M., Tangpanitanon, J., Romero, G., & Kwek, L. C. (2020) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.101.012111 · Cited by 39
Quantum non-demolition measurement of a many-body Hamiltonian
Yang, D., Grankin, A., Sieberer, L. M., Vasilyev, D. V., & Zoller, P. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-14489-5 · Cited by 42
Observation of Strong and Weak Thermalization in a Superconducting Quantum Processor
Chen, F., Sun, Z., Gong, M., Zhu, Q., Zhang, Y.-R., Wu, Y., Ye, Y., Zha, C., Li, S., Guo, S., et al. (2021) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.127.020602 · Cited by 40
Gong, M., Huang, H.-L., Wang, S., Guo, C., Li, S., Wu, Y., Zhu, Q., Zhao, Y., Guo, S., Qian, H., et al. (2023) · 中国科学通报：英文版 · doi:10.1016/j.scib.2023.04.003 · Cited by 46
Reservoir-Engineered Spin Squeezing: Macroscopic Even-Odd Effects and Hybrid-Systems Implementations
Groszkowski, P., Koppenhöfer, M., Lau, H.-K., & Clerk, A. A. (2022) · Physical Review X · doi:10.1103/physrevx.12.011015 · Cited by 38
Kibble-Zurek scaling in quantum speed limits for shortcuts to adiabaticity
Puebla, R., Deffner, S., & Campbell, S. (2020) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.2.032020 · Cited by 38
Embedding the Yang-Lee quantum criticality in open quantum systems
Matsumoto, N., Nakagawa, M., & Ueda, M. (2022) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.4.033250 · Cited by 39
Dynamical and excited-state quantum phase transitions in collective systems
Corps, Á. L., & Relaño, A. (2022) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.106.024311 · Cited by 39
Multipartite-entanglement tomography of a quantum simulator
Gabbrielli, M., Lepori, L., & Pezzè, L. (2019) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/aafb8c · Cited by 39
Floquet-Engineered Vibrational Dynamics in a Two-Dimensional Array of Trapped Ions
Kiefer, P., Hakelberg, F., Wittemer, M., Bermúdez, A., Porras, D., Warring, U., & Schaetz, T. (2019) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.123.213605 · Cited by 37
Progress in Trapped-Ion Quantum Simulation
Foss‐Feig, M., Pagano, G., Potter, A. C., & Yao, N. Y. (2024) · Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics · doi:10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-032822-045619 · Cited by 65
Self-citationGeometric quantum speed limits and short-time accessibility to unitary operations
Poggi, P. M. (2019) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.99.042116 · Cited by 36
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhang, J., Pagano, G., Hess, P. W., Kyprianidis, A., Becker, P., Kaplan, H., Gorshkov, A. V., Gong, Z.-X., & Monroe, C.
- Affiliations
- National Institute of Standards and Technology (US)
- Corresponding author
- Zhang, J.
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2017-11-30
- Volume
- 551
- Issue
- 7682
- Pages
- 601-604
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- PMC
- PMC6506159
- OpenAlex
- W2744305830
- Semantic Scholar
- c0a03980f716165b71587b2e20a02af7e17abe69
- Cited by
- 1,079
- References
- 50
- Citations by year
- 2026: 58 · 2025: 94 · 2024: 112 · 2023: 121 · 2022: 131 · 2021: 164 · 2020: 163 · 2019: 139 · 2018: 93 · 2017: 4
- FWCI
- 53.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Nature (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum many-body systems
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates
- Keywords
- quantum simulation, trapped-ion quantum simulator, transverse-field Ising model, long-range interactions, nonequilibrium dynamics, single-shot measurement, many-body correlations, quantum computing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
