Cited by 68Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality ControlAdvanced Biosensing Techniques and ApplicationsHereditary Neurological Disorders

Seven day pre-analytical stability of serum and plasma neurofilament light chain

Open access
Altmann, Patrick, Ponleitner, Markus, Rommer, Paulus Stefan, Haslacher, Helmuth, Mucher, Patrick, Leutmezer, Fritz, Petzold, Axel, Wotawa, Christoph +4 more·2021·Scientific Reports

Abstract

Neurofilament light chain (NfL) has emerged as a biomarker of neuroaxonal damage in several neurologic conditions. With increasing availability of fourth-generation immunoassays detecting NfL in blood, aspects of pre-analytical stability of this biomarker remain unanswered. This study investigated NfL concentrations in serum and plasma samples of 32 patients with neurological diagnoses using state of the art Simoa technology. We tested the effect of delayed freezing of up to 7 days and statistically determined stability and validity of measured concentrations. We found concentrations of NfL in serum and plasma to remain stable at room temperature when processing of samples is delayed up to 7 days (serum: mean absolute difference 0.9 pg/mL, intraindividual variation 1.2%; plasma: mean absolute difference 0.5 pg/mL, intraindividual variation 1.3%). Consistency of these results was nearly perfect for serum and excellent for plasma (intraclass correlation coefficients 0.99 and 0.94, respectively). In conclusion, the soluble serum and plasma NfL concentration remains stable when unprocessed blood samples are stored up to 7 days at room temperature. This information is essential for ensuring reliable study protocols, for example, when shipment of fresh samples is needed.

Verification finished with gaps

Some checks didn’t finish. The results below cover the steps that did.

  1. Registry recordVerified
  2. Full textRead the full text
  3. Reference list15 references found
  4. Reference check15 of 15 references checked
  5. StatisticsRecomputed
  6. Claims30 claims anchored to a quote
  7. Cited sourcesChecked
  8. Self-checkDidn’t finish — the rest of the report still applies.
  9. VerificationFindings verified

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

Serum and plasma neurofilament light chain (NfL) concentrations remained stable when unprocessed blood samples were stored at room temperature for up to 7 days before processing. The authors conclude that delayed processing is acceptable for NfL research protocols, with serum showing slightly better reliability than plasma.

Key findings

  • For samples stored 7 days at room temperature, mean absolute difference versus immediate freezing was 0.9 pg/mL for serum NfL and 0.5 pg/mL for plasma NfL; intraindividual variation was 9.0% for serum and 6.5% for plasma.
  • Reliability at 7 days at room temperature was near-perfect for serum (ICC = 0.99) and excellent for plasma (ICC = 0.94).
  • Inter-assay variability was low: serum NfL iSD 0.6 pg/mL, iCOV 4.8%, ICC 1.0; plasma NfL iSD 1.6 pg/mL, iCOV 12.7%, ICC 0.99.
  • Mean baseline concentrations were 14.5 pg/mL for serum NfL and 12.5 pg/mL for plasma NfL in 32 patients with neurological diagnoses.

Methods

  • Serum and plasma samples from 32 patients with neurological diagnoses (multiple sclerosis n = 20, Parkinson’s disease n = 6, Alzheimer disease n = 4, primary headache n = 2) were collected in Greiner Bio-One Vacuette serum and EDTA tubes.
  • Each participant provided 4 serum and 4 plasma samples stored before processing under four conditions: immediate, 3 days at 4–8 °C, 3 days at room temperature, and 7 days at room temperature.
  • NfL was measured with Simoa Nf-light kits on a Simoa SR-X Analyzer; analyses included repeated-measures ANOVA, Bland–Altman plots, intraindividual SD/COV, and intraclass correlation coefficients. A separate validity cohort of 4 patients had paired serum/plasma samples measured on four assay plates for inter-assay reliability.

Limitations

  • Stated: results may not generalize to other blood collection systems, since only Greiner Bio-One Vacuette tubes were used.
  • Stated: validity depends on meticulous quality control in a specialized biomarker laboratory; real-world labs may have protocol deviations, human error, hemolysis, or concurrent analyses.
  • Stated: findings apply to a population with serum NfL concentrations from 4.5 to 58.3 pg/mL and may not apply to higher concentrations. Evident from the text: the main cohort was small (n = 32) and diagnostically mixed, which may further limit broader generalizability.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41598-021-90639-z

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

3 of 6 cited sources checked · 3 supported · 0 flagged

  • Interpretationown data

    Inter-assay validity results are comparable to another large study investigating NfL and reporting assay precision.

    “We provide data for inter-assay validity and found those results comparable to another large study investigating NfL and reporting assay precision15.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [15] Khalil, M. et al. Serum neurofilament light levels in normal aging and their association with morphologic brain changes. Nat. Commun. 11, 812 (2020). source
  • Findingown data

    For samples stored for 7 days at room temperature, intraindividual variation (iCOV) is 9.0% for serum and 6.5% for plasma.

    “For all three altered pre-freezing intervals, intraindividual variation (iCOV) was minimal (for samples stored for 7 days at room temperature; serum: 9.0%, plasma: 6.5%)”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Inter-assay variability within four serum and four plasma samples measured on four consecutive runs was perfect.

    “Inter-assay variability within four serum and four plasma samples measured on four consecutive runs was perfect.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data

    After 3 days at 4-8 °C, the mean absolute difference in NfL concentration compared to immediate freezing is 0.9 pg/mL for serum and 0.5 pg/mL for plasma.

    “After storing of serum and blood tubes for 3 days at 4–8 °C, mean absolute differences compared to immediate freezing were 0.9 pg/mL for sNfL and 0.5 pg/mL for pNfL.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    The mean concentration of NfL in plasma was 10% lower (95% CI 5-16) than in serum.

    “First, the mean concentration of NfL in plasma was 10% lower (95% CI 5–16) than in serum which compares well to another investigation10.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [10] Hviid, C. V. B., Knudsen, C. S. & Parkner, T. Reference interval and preanalytical properties of serum neurofilament light chain in Scandinavian adults. Scand. J. Clin. Lab. Investig. https://doi.org/10.1080/00365513.2020.1730434 (2020). source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 12
  • May combine two claims. 6
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    An a priori power calculation for detecting a systemic measurement error of 2 pg/mL (at 80% power and α-level 0.05) was performed, and 32 patients were included for the main study.

    “Based on a previous study we performed an a priori power calculation for detecting a systemic measurement error of 2 pg/mL (at 80% power and an α-level of 0.05), we included groups consisting of (i) 32 patients for the main study of delayed processing of serum and plasma samples”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [11] Altmann, P. et al. Serum neurofilament light chain withstands delayed freezing and repeated thawing. Sci. Rep. 10, 19982 (2020). source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Our results are in line with two other studies reporting pre-analytical stability of serum NfL in smaller cohorts, making this the largest study confirming this observation for both serum and plasma.

    “Our results are in line with two other studies reporting pre-analytical stability of serum NfL in smaller cohorts making this the largest study confirming this observation for both serum and plasma10,11.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [10] Hviid, C. V. B., Knudsen, C. S. & Parkner, T. Reference interval and preanalytical properties of serum neurofilament light chain in Scandinavian adults. Scand. J. Clin. Lab. Investig. https://doi.org/10.1080/00365513.2020.1730434 (2020). source
    • cites [11] Altmann, P. et al. Serum neurofilament light chain withstands delayed freezing and repeated thawing. Sci. Rep. 10, 19982 (2020). source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Separate analysis for the lowest and highest quartiles revealed still acceptable ICCs for sNfL and pNfL, though intraclass correlation was better for serum.

    “Separate analysis for the lowest and highest quartiles revealed still acceptable ICCs for sNfL and pNfL though intraclass correlation was better for serum.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    For sNfL, inter-assay iSD was 0.6 pg/mL (range 0.5-1.2), iCOV 4.8% (range 2.0-6.0), and ICC 1.0 (range 0.99-1.00).

    “For sNfL, the iSD was 0.6 pg/mL (range 0.5–1.2), the iCOV 4.8% (range 2.0–6.0) and the ICC 1.0 (range 0.99–1.00).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    For pNfL, inter-assay iSD was 1.6 pg/mL (range 0.8-2.7), iCOV 12.7% (range 6.0-18.0), and ICC 0.99 (range 0.90-1.00).

    “For pNFL, the iSD was 1.6 pg/mL (range 0.8–2.7), the iCOV 12.7% (range 6.0–18.0) and the ICC 0.99 (range 0.90–1.00).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    Only samples yielding a coefficient of variance (CV) between paired replicates below 0.20 were included in this study.

    “As per usual convention, only samples yielding a coefficient of variance (CV) between paired replicates below 0.20 were included in this study.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The results may not be generalizable to a real-world busy lab setting due to greater risk of protocol deviation, human error, and other preanalytical errors.

    “A real-world setting in a busy lab is expectedly more prone to accidental protocol deviation, human error, and other preanalytical errors such as hemolysis or the fact that various analyses are performed on a Quanterix reader for different analytes at the same time.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: A real-world setting in a busy lab is more prone to accidental protocol deviation, human error, and other preanalytical errors such as hemolysis or simultaneous analyses on a Quanterix reader.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductreasoning

    This study complies with the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki regarding ethical conduct of research involving human subjects.

    “This study complies with the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki regarding ethical conduct of research involving human subjects.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    The ethics committee at the Medical University of Vienna approved this study (protocol number EK2100/2019, amended in July 2020).

    “The ethics committee at the Medical University of Vienna (protocol number EK2100/2019, amended in July 2020) approved this study.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The results may not be generalizable to other collection systems.

    “Other collection systems may produce different results.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Other collection systems can produce different results.
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    The results relate to a population showing sNfL concentrations ranging from 4.5 to 58.3 pg/mL and may not be applied to higher concentrations.

    “Moreover, our results relate to a population showing sNfL concentrations ranging from 4.5 to 58.3 pg/mL and may not be applied to higher concentrations.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    Inter-assay reproducibility was determined by repeatedly measuring NfL concentrations in 8 paired serum and plasma samples from 4 volunteers on four consecutive assay plates.

    “In order to determine inter-assay reproducibility, we repeatedly measured NfL concentrations in 8 paired serum and plasma samples from 4 volunteers on four consecutive assay plates.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    Inclusion of participants into the biobanking protocol followed written informed consent.

    “Inclusion of participants into the biobanking protocol followed written informed consent.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Only patients not taking any medication affecting thrombocyte function or blood coagulation were included.

    “To avoid interference with our comparing measurements in serum and plasma, only patients not taking any medication affecting thrombocyte function of blood coagulation were included.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    NfL concentrations were analyzed by a blinded investigator.

    “Serum and plasma aliquots were thawed for an hour at room temperature and analyzed by a blinded investigator.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Well and plate assignment was designed so that all aliquots from the same participant were analyzed in the same run to avoid within-subject run-to-run variability.

    “Well and plate assignment was designed so that all aliquots from the same participant were analyzed in the same run to avoid within-subject run-to-run variability.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    The validity of the results depends on meticulous quality control in a specialized biomarker laboratory.

    “Furthermore, the validity of our results depends on meticulous quality control in a specialized biomarker laboratory.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
17 of 17
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    A real-world setting in a busy lab is more prone to accidental protocol deviation, human error, and other preanalytical errors such as hemolysis or simultaneous analyses on a Quanterix reader.

    “A real-world setting in a busy lab is expectedly more prone to accidental protocol deviation, human error, and other preanalytical errors such as hemolysis or the fact that various analyses are performed on a Quanterix reader for different analytes at the same time.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Other collection systems can produce different results.

    “Other collection systems may produce different results.”
2 of 2

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

This check didn’t finish.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Altmann, P., Ponleitner, M., Rommer, P. S., Haslacher, H., Mucher, P., Leutmezer, F., Petzold, A., Wotawa, C., Lanzenberger, R., Berger, T., Zetterberg, H., & Bsteh, G.
Affiliations
  • Medical University of Vienna (AT)
  • UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology (GB)
  • Sahlgrenska University Hospital (SE)
Corresponding author
Bsteh, Gabriel
Venue
Scientific Reports
Published
2021-05-26
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
11034-11034
ISSN
2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3165219122
Cited by
68
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 3
FWCI
6.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Scientific Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Universität Wien
  • Medizinische Universität Wien
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Advanced Biosensing Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Hereditary Neurological Disorders
Keywords
neurofilament light chain, pre-analytical stability, serum, plasma, room temperature storage, sample storage, Simoa, neurological disorders, sample shipment
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Female, Humans, Immunoassay, Intermediate Filaments, Male, Middle Aged, Nervous System Diseases, Plasma, Specimen Handling, Time Factors, Biomarkers, Neurofilament Proteins, Protein Stability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-17.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-17.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review