Cited by 166Genomics and Phylogenetic StudiesViral Infectious Diseases and Gene Expression in InsectsGenomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities

Chinese hamster genome sequenced from sorted chromosomes

Open access
Brinkrolf, Karina, Rupp, Oliver, Laux, Holger, Kollin, Florian, Ernst, Wolfgang, Linke, Burkhard, Kofler, Rudolf, Romand, Sandrine +15 more·2013·Nature Biotechnology

Abstract

In recent years, the number of published genome sequences has increased substantially owing to major developments in next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies, concomitant reduction of sequencing costs and improvements in assembly strategies. In 2011, your journal published the genome of Chinese hamster ovary (CHO)-K1 cells, the most frequently used mammalian production cell line for biopharmaceutical products 1 . In this issue, the genomes of several related CHO cell lines as well as of the genome of the Chinese hamster are also presented 2 . Although this information provides long-awaited and necessary insights for scientists working with these important production hosts, it also highlights a major drawback of short-read NGS technology, namely, the difficulty of assembling short-read data and scaffolding these sequences into a fully structured genome. This is especially critical for CHO cells, which are known to be genomically unstable, with frequent chromosome rearrangements and loss 3 , 4 . In the following correspondence, we describe how a chromosome sorting approach can facilitate genome assembly from short-read sequences.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nbt.2645

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The publication of the CHO-K1 genome sequence in 2011, followed by the publication of two Chinese hamster and six CHO cell line genomes in 2013, bring new opportunities in developing and engineering CHO cells for improved glycoprotein production.

    “The publication of the CHO-K1 genome sequence in 2011, followed by the publication of two Chinese hamster and six CHO cell line genomes in 2013, bring new opportunities in developing and engineering CHO cells for improved glycoprotein production (Xu et al., 2011;Brinkrolf et al., 2013;Lewis et al., 2013).”

    From Therapeutic glycoprotein production in mammalian cells (2017) · cites this paper as Brinkrolf et al., 2013

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Gnerre, S. et al. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108, 1513-1518 (2011).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brinkrolf, K., Rupp, O., Laux, H., Kollin, F., Ernst, W., Linke, B., Kofler, R., Romand, S., Hesse, F., Budach, W. E., Galosy, S., Müller, D., Noll, T., Wienberg, J., Jostock, T., Leonard, M., Grillari, J., Tauch, A., Goesmann, A., Helk, B., Mott, J. E., Pühler, A., & Borth, N.
Affiliations
  • Bielefeld University (DE)
  • Novartis (Switzerland) (CH)
  • BOKU University (AT)
  • Pfizer (United States) (US)
  • Austrian Centre of Industrial Biotechnology (Austria) (AT)
Corresponding author
  • Pühler, Alfred
  • Borth, Nicole
Venue
Nature Biotechnology
Published
2013-08
Volume
31
Issue
8
Pages
694-695
ISSN
  • 0733-222X (ISSN-L)
  • 1087-0156
  • 1546-1696
OpenAlex
W2072880634
Cited by
166
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 4
FWCI
9.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Biotechnology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PUB – Publications at Bielefeld University (Bielefeld University) (submittedVersion)
  • Publikationen an der Universität Bielefeld (Universität Bielefeld) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Viral Infectious Diseases and Gene Expression in Insects
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities
Keywords
chromosome sorting, genome assembly, short-read sequencing, CHO-K1 cells, CHO cells, chromosomal rearrangements
MeSH terms
Animals, Chromosome Aberrations, Cricetulus, Cricetinae, Humans, Molecular Sequence Data, CHO Cells, Genome, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Chromosomes, Mammalian

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review