Cited by 641CRISPR and Genetic EngineeringRNA Interference and Gene DeliveryDNA Repair Mechanisms

Gene targeting using zinc finger nucleases

Porteus, Matthew H, Carroll, Dana·2005·Nature Biotechnology

Abstract

The ability to achieve site-specific manipulation of the mammalian genome has widespread implications for basic and applied research. Gene targeting is a process in which a DNA molecule introduced into a cell replaces the corresponding chromosomal segment by homologous recombination, and thus presents a precise way to manipulate the genome. In the past, the application of gene targeting to mammalian cells has been limited by its low efficiency. Zinc finger nucleases (ZFNs) show promise in improving the efficiency of gene targeting by introducing DNA double-strand breaks in target genes, which then stimulate the cell's endogenous homologous recombination machinery. Recent results have shown that ZFNs can be used to create targeting frequencies of up to 20% in a human disease-causing gene. Future work will be needed to translate these in vitro findings to in vivo applications and to determine whether zinc finger nucleases create undesired genomic instability.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nbt1125

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Different endonucleases employed as second generation tools include zinc finger nucleases (ZFN), meganucleases, TALEN, and CRISPR/Cas9.

    “As second generation tools, different endonucleases have been employed.This category includes zinc finger nucleases (ZFN), meganucleases, transcription activators like effectors nucleases (TALEN) and CRISPR/Cas9 (Durai et al., 2005;Porteus and Carroll 2005;Cabaniols et al., 2010;Silva et al., 2011;Kim et al., 2012;Sanjana et al., 2012;Cho et al., 2013;Sun and Zhao, 2013).”

    From Therapeutic glycoprotein production in mammalian cells (2017) · cites this paper as Porteus and Carroll 2005

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Porteus, M. H., & Carroll, D.
Affiliations
  • The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
  • University of Utah (US)
Corresponding author
Porteus, Matthew H
Venue
Nature Biotechnology
Published
2005-08
Volume
23
Issue
8
Pages
967-973
ISSN
  • 0733-222X (ISSN-L)
  • 1087-0156
  • 1546-1696
OpenAlex
W2004360848
Cited by
641
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 37 · 2016: 33 · 2015: 34 · 2014: 32 · 2013: 46 · 2012: 50
FWCI
1.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Biotechnology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Interference and Gene Delivery
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
Keywords
zinc finger nucleases, gene targeting, homologous recombination, DNA double-strand breaks, targeting efficiency, genomic instability
MeSH terms
Deoxyribonucleases, DNA, DNA Damage, DNA Repair, Genetic Engineering, Recombination, Genetic, Zinc Fingers, Gene Targeting

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review